Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic suture fixation of self-expanding metallic stents with and without submucosal injection

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are useful for treating leaks after bariatric procedures but stent migration (12 to 40 %) remains a problem. Suture fixation has been used to minimize migration but has attendant risks of transmural penetration. We hypothesized that submucosal injection would decrease the risk of full thickness suture penetration while still providing greater pullout forces than endoscopic clipping.

Methods

Porcine explant models and 155 mm SEMS were used with a force meter to measure the pullout forces required to dislodge the stent. Stents were first deployed without fixation and this pullout force acted as a control. The explants were then randomized to receive fixation with clips, endoscopic suturing with submucosal elevation, or endoscopic suturing without submucosal elevation. The pullout force was again measured and the ratio of the experimental to control pullout forces was used as a measure of the efficacy of the fixation.

Results

Endoscopic suture fixation after submucosal injection resulted in statistically significant increased pullout force compared to clip fixation (n = 5; mean force ratio 462 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 281–643 %; p < 0.01). Endoscopic suturing fixation without submucosal injection also resulted in statistically significant increased pullout force (n = 5; mean force ratio 765 %; 95 % CI 258–632 %; p < 0.01). Fixation with clips did not result in significantly increased pullout force compared to no fixation (n = 5; mean force ratio 108 %; 95 % CI 56–159 %; p < 0.01). Submucosal injection also eliminated full thickness suture penetration (0/10 submucosal injection; 7/10 no injection).

Conclusions

Endoscopic suture fixation of SEMS resulted in a statistically significant increase in pullout force necessary to displace the stents. Submucosal injection prior to suture fixation preserves the increased pullout force while minimizing the risk of transmural penetration with the potential for less risk of injury to mediastinal structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leenders BJ, Stronkhorst A, Smulders FJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Gilissen LP (2013) Removable and repositionable covered metal self-expandable stents for leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery: experiences in a tertiary referral hospital. Surg Endosc 27(8):2751–2759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bakken JC, Wong Kee Song LM, de Groen PC, Baron TH (2010) Use of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent for the treatment of benign esophageal diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 72(4):712–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Langer FB, Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Riegler FM, Zacherl J (2010) Solving the problem of difficult stent removal due to tissue ingrowth in partially uncovered esophageal self-expanding metal stents. Ann Thorac Surg 89(5):1691–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rieder E, Dunst CM, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanstrom LL (2012) Endoscopic suture fixation of gastrointestinal stents: proof of biomechanical principles and early clinical experience. Endoscopy 44:1121–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holm AN, de la Mora Levy JG, Gostout CJ, Topazian MD, Baron TH (2008) Self-expanding plastic stents in treatment of benign esophageal conditions. Gastrointest Endosc 67(1):20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko HK, Song HY, Shin JH, Lee GH, Jung HY, Park SI (2007) Fate of migrated esophageal and gastroduodenal stents: experience in 70 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(6):725–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seven G, Irani S, Ross AS, Gan SI, Gluck M, Low D, Kozarek RA (2013) Partially versus fully covered self-expanding metal stents for benign and malignant esophageal conditions: a single center experience. Surg Endosc 27(6):2185–2192

  8. Blackmon SH, Santora R, Schwarz P, Barroso A, Dunkin BJ (2010) Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management. Ann Thorac Surg 89(3):931–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. supported this study with funding for porcine explants as well as supplying OverStitch™ devices, suture, and cinches.

Disclosures

Victor T. Wilcox, Albert Y. Huang, Nabil Tariq, Brian J. Dunkin have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, The Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, Suite 1661, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Victor T. Wilcox, Albert Y. Huang, Nabil Tariq & Brian J. Dunkin

  2. The Methodist Institute for Technology, Innovation, and Education (MITIESM), 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Victor T. Wilcox & Brian J. Dunkin

Authors
  1. Victor T. Wilcox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert Y. Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nabil Tariq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brian J. Dunkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor T. Wilcox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilcox, V.T., Huang, A.Y., Tariq, N. et al. Endoscopic suture fixation of self-expanding metallic stents with and without submucosal injection. Surg Endosc 29, 24–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3640-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3640-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation