Skip to main content
Log in

Perineal sigmoidopexy utilizing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) to treat full thickness rectal prolapse: a feasibility trial in porcine and human cadaver models

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Perineal approaches for rectal prolapse repair have low complication rates but high recurrence rates, while abdominal approaches that include sigmoidopexy have lower recurrence rates but higher complication rates. To optimize both recurrence and complication rates, we developed a novel procedure that uses transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) to perform a sigmoidopexy via a perineal approach.

Methods

We created a rectal prolapse model in six swine and two human cadavers using a previously published technique. The rectum was mobilized and eviscerated transanally. After marking the planned point of sigmoid transection, the rectum was returned to the peritoneal cavity. A TEM proctoscope was inserted transanally alongside the rectum, and the lateral sigmoid colon walls were sutured to the sacrum. The sigmoid colon was then transected where previously planned, and a primary sigmoid anastomosis was performed. Total operative time, sigmoidopexy operative time, and suture security were measured and compared to standard rectosigmoidectomy and abdominal sigmoidopexy times.

Results

No sigmoid colon, iliac vessel, bladder, or ureteral injuries occurred. At least two sigmoidopexy sutures were secure on inspection in all animals and human cadavers, with increasing success of secure suture placement as experience increased. Operative length was similar to traditional abdominal sigmoidopexy.

Conclusions

TEM sigmoidopexy is technically feasible. This approach has the potential to reduce the recurrence rate associated with perineal approaches alone, but further study is needed to confirm this hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altomare DF, Binda G, Ganio E, De Nardi P, Giamundo P, Pescatori M (2009) Long-term outcome of Altemeier’s procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 52:698–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1999) Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 42:460–466 discussion 466–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD (2011) Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1339–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delaney CP (2007) Laparoscopic management of rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 11:150–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, Hammel J, Nocero J, Bast J, Brady K, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ (2006) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 20:35–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marderstein EL, Delaney CP (2007) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:552–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R (2001) The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44:565–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sylla P, Willingham FF, Sohn DK, Gee D, Brugge WR, Rattner DW (2008) NOTES rectosigmoid resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with transgastric endoscopic assistance: a pilot study in swine. J Gastrointest Surgery 12:1717–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R (2005) Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1200–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karas JR, Uranues S, Altomare DF, Sokmen S, Krivokapic Z, Hoch J, Bartha I, Bergamaschi R (2011) No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee TG, Lee SJ (2014) Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia. Surg Endosc 28:271–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Milsom J, Trencheva K, Pavoor R, Dirocco J, Shukla PJ, Kawamura J, Sonoda T (2011) Endoscopic fixation of the rectum for rectal prolapse: a feasibility and survival experimental study. Surg Endosc 25:3691–3697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calisto JL, Kawamura J, Trencheva K, Oliveira O, Ho V, Yan J, Lei W, Milsom J (2011) Fixation of intestinal tissue using a novel endoscopic device. Surg Innov 18:44–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams NS, Giordano P, Dvorkin LS, Huang A, Hetzer FH, Scott SM (2005) External pelvic rectal suspension (the express procedure) for full-thickness rectal prolapse: evolution of a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 48:307–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dench JE, Scott SM, Lunniss PJ, Dvorkin LS, Williams NS (2006) Multimedia article. External pelvic rectal suspension (the express procedure) for internal rectal prolapse, with or without concomitant rectocele repair: a video demonstration. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1922–1926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Spennacchio M, Fratus G, Despini L, Roviaro G (2012) Trans-obturator colonic suspension during Altemeier’s operation for full-thickness rectal prolapse: preliminary results with a new technique. Colorectal Dis 14:616–622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar AS, Chhitwal N, Coralic J, Stahl TJ, Ayscue JM, FitzGerald JF, Smith LE (2012) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: safe for midrectal lesions in morbidly obese patients. Am J Surg 204:402–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Monson JR (2007) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 21:97–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Y, Wu YY, Li S, Zhu BS, Zhao K, Yang XD, Xing CG (2011) TEM and conventional rectal surgery for T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 58:364–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Liliana Bordeianou, Patricia Sylla, Christine Kinnier, and David Rattner have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Bordeianou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bordeianou, L., Sylla, P., Kinnier, C.V. et al. Perineal sigmoidopexy utilizing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) to treat full thickness rectal prolapse: a feasibility trial in porcine and human cadaver models. Surg Endosc 29, 686–691 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3722-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3722-4

Keywords

Navigation