Abstract
Background
There is still some controversy over whether to use laparoscopic operative cholangiograms routinely (RLOC) or selectively (SLOC). Due to their high cost as well as other issues, in March 1997 we converted from RLOC to SLOC. The purpose of this study was to validate that decision.
Methods
The results of 2043 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) were compiled and analyzed. The results of RLOC in 1556 patients undergoing LC from March 1990 through February 1997 were compared to the results of SLOC in 16 patients undergoing LC from March 1989 through February 1990 and 471 patients undergoing LC from March 1997 through December 1998. The literature was reviewed and data were compiled. Reasons that are typically given for operative cholangiograms (OC) were collected and scrutinized. Finally, cost surveys for RLOC and related procedures were obtained.
Results
Overall, laparoscopic operative cholangiogram (LOC) was attempted in 1661 patients and was successful in 1656 cases (99.7%). Bile duct stones (BDS) were evident in 166 patients. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) was attempted in all cases. None were referred for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the RLOC group, evidence of BDS was observed in 136 patients (9%). Forty-two were unsuspected (2.8%) and five were false positive (0.3%). In a collection of other RLOC studies, the average rate of unsuspected BDS was 2.9%, while the average rate of false positive cholangiograms was 1.6%. In the SLOC group, LOC was indicated in 139 of 487 patients (28.6%). None of the patients who did not have a LOC developed symptomatic residual BDS in ⋜11 years of follow-up. In a large collection of other SLOC studies, the rate of symptomatic residual BDS was 0.3%. A cost survey in February 1997 revealed that the average minimum global charge (MGC) for an OC was $1283.21; for a transcystic duct LBDE it was $1055.10, and for a transcholedochal LBDE it was $31263.61. The MGC for an ERCP with papillotomy was $4303.00. Thus, to avoid one patient with symptomatic residual BDS, 354 unnecessary procedures (333 RLOC, 18 LBDE, and three postoperative ERCP) costing $473,927.52 would be performed. There were no false negatives, bile duct injuries, or other complications attributable to RLOC or SLOC.
Conclusions
The increased morbidity and cost of RLOC to avoid symptomatic residual BDS is not justified. All other reasons given for RLOC are either flawed or indicate that the procedure can be safely employed selectively. SLOC is an effective method of verifying suspected BDS and is safer and less expensive than RLOC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkan JS, Fried GM, Barkan AN, Sigman HH, Hinchey EJ, Garzon J, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL (1993) Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Ann Surg 218: 371–379
Bartlett MK, Quinby WC (1956) Mortality and complications of cholecystectomy and choledochostomy for chronic cholecystitis. N Engl J Med 254: 154–156
Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 161: 355–360
Berci G, Steckell R (1973) Modern radiology in the operating room. Arch Surg 107: 577–586
Bogokowsky H, Slutzki S, Zaidenstein L, Halpern Z, Negri M, Abramsohn R (1987) Selective operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164: 124–126
Cahill CJ, Pain JA (1988) Current practice in biliary surgery. Br J Surg 75: 1169–1172
Clair DG, Carr-Locke DL, Becker JM, Brooks DC (1993) Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 128: 551–554
Donohue JH (1997) Operative cholangiography: routine verses selective. In: Olsen D, Jensen SL, Ferreres AR, Corbitt JD (eds) Textbook of videoscopic surgery. Overseas Publishers Association, Amsterdam, pp 105–109
Dorazio RA (1995) Selective operative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 61: 911–913
Farha GJ, Pearson RN (1974) Duct stones present? Transcystic duct operative cholangiography. J Kan Med Soc 75: 265–267
Fiore NF, Ledniczky G, Wiebke EA, Broadie TA, Pruitt AL, Goulet RJ, Grosfeld JL, Canal DF (1997) An analysis of perioperative cholangiography in one thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery 122: 817–823
Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Scott MG, Scoville WA, Imbembo, AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg 215: 209–215
Gerber A, Apt MK (1982) The case against routine operative cholangiography. Am J Surg 143: 134–136
Glenn F, McSherry CK (1975) Calculus biliary tract disease. Curr Probl Surg 12: 26–33
Grace PA, Qureshi, A, Burke P, Leahy A, Brindley N, Osborne H, Lane B, Broe P, Bouchier-Hayes D (1993) Selective cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 80: 244–246
Gregg RO (1988) The case for selective cholangiography. Am J Surg 155: 540–544
Grogono JL, Woods WGA (1986) Selective use of operative cholangiography. World J Surg 19: 1009–1013
Hamlin JA (1981) Biliary ductal anomalies. In: Berci G, Hamlin JA (eds) Operative biliary radiology. Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, pp 109–137
Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, Solheim K, Amlie EJB, Havig O, Rosseland AR (1993) Prospective randomized study of routine intraoperative cholangiography during open cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of predictors of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 113: 318–323
Hicken NF, McAllister JA (1964) Operative cholangiography as an aid in reducing the incidence of “overlooked” common bile duct stones: a study of 1293 choledochotomies. Surgery 55: 753–758
Lorimer JW, Fairfull-Smith RJ (1995) Intraoperative cholangiography is not essential to avoid duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169: 344–347
Lygidakis NJ (1982) Potential hazards of intraoperative cholangiography in patients with infected bile. Gut 23: 1015–1018
Mansberger JA, Davis JB, Scarborough C, Bowden TA (1988) Selective intraoperative cholangiography. Am Surg 54: 31–33
Mirizzi PL (1937) Operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 65: 702–710
Mofti AB, Ahmed I, Tandon RC, Al-Tameen MM, Al-Khudairy NN (1986) Routine selective peroperative cholangiography. Br J Surg 73: 548–550
Murison MSC, Gartell PC, McGinn FP (1989) Does selective peroperative cholangiography result in missed common bile duct stones?. Br J Surg 76: 1343 [Abstract]
Pace BW, Cosgrove J, Margolis IB, Breuer B (1992) Intraoperative cholangiography revisited. Arch Surg 127: 448–450
Pernthaler H, Sandbichler P, Schmid T, Margreiter R (1990) Operative cholangiography in elective cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 77: 399–400
Robinson BL, Donohue JH, Gunes S, Thompson GB, Grant CS, Michael GS, Farnell MB, van Heerden JA (1995) Selective operative cholangiography, appropriate management for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 130: 625–630
Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ala Med 59: 18–22.
Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK, Lane DR (1999) Management of bile duct stones in 1572 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 65: 530–547
Stark ME, Loughry WC (1980) Routine operative cholangiogram with cholecystectomy. Obstet 151: 657–658
Taylor OM, Sedman PC, Jones BM, Royston CMS, Arulampalam T, Wellwood J (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without operative cholangiogram: 2038 cases over a 5-year period in two district general hospitals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79: 376–380
Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Fagertun M, Rosseland A (1995) Selection criteria for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallstone disease. World J Surg 19: 852–857
Voyles CR, Sanders DL, Hogan R (1994) Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 219: 744–752
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 20 October 2000
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0043-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snow, L.L., Weinstein, L.S., Hannon, J.K. et al. Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15, 14–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000311
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000311