Abstract
In this contribution we address the issue of efficient finite element treatment for phase-field modeling of brittle fracture. We start by providing an overview of the existing quasi-static and dynamic phase-field fracture formulations from the physics and the mechanics communities. Within the formulations stemming from Griffith’s theory, we focus on quasi-static models featuring a tension-compression split, which prevent cracking in compression and interpenetration of the crack faces upon closure, and on the staggered algorithmic implementation due to its proved robustness. In this paper, we establish an appropriate stopping criterion for the staggered scheme. Moreover, we propose and test the so-called hybrid formulation, which leads within a staggered implementation to an incrementally linear problem. This enables a significant reduction of computational cost—about one order of magnitude—with respect to the available (non-linear) models. The conceptual and structural similarities of the hybrid formulation to gradient-enhanced continuum damage mechanics are outlined as well. Several benchmark problems are solved, including one with own experimental verification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krueger R (2004) Virtual crack closure technique: history, approach, and applications. Appl Mech Rev 57(2):109–143
Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1267–1282
Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(1):131–150
Aranson IS, Kalatsky VA, Vinokur VM (2000) Continuum field description of crack propagation. Phys Rev Lett 85:118–121
Karma A, Kessler DA, Levine H (2001) Phase-field model of mode III dynamic fracture. Phys Rev Lett 87:045501
Hakim V, Karma A (2009) Laws of crack motion and phase-field models of fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57:342–368
Spatschek R, Brener E, Karma A (2011) Phase field modeling of crack propagation. Philos Mag 91:75–95
Eastgate LO, Sethna JP, Rauscher M, Cretegny T, Chen CS, Myers CR (2002) Fracture in mode I using a conserved phase-field model. Phys Rev E 71:036117
Henry H, Levine H (2004) Dynamic instabilities of fracture under biaxial strain using a phase field model. Phys Rev Lett 93:105504
Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48:797–826
Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91:5–148
Kuhn C, Müller R (2008) A phase field model for fracture. Proc Appl Math Mech 8:10223–10224
Kuhn C, Müller R (2010) A continuum phase field model for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 77:3625–3634
Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57:1209–1229
Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83:1273–1311
Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2765–2778
Borden MJ, Hughes TJR, Landis CM, Verhoosel CV (2014) A higher-order phase-field model for brittle fracture: formulation and analysis within the isogeometric analysis framework. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 273:100–118
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1980) Statistical physics. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fractures as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–1342
Larsen CJ, Ortner C, Süli E (2010) Existence of solutions to a regularized model of dynamic fracture. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 20:1021–1048
Bourdin B, Larsen CJ, Richardson C (2011) A time-discrete model for dynamic fracture based on crack regularization. Int J Fract 168:133–143
Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJR, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217—-220:77–95
Hofacker M, Miehe C (2012) Continuum phase field modeling of dynamic fracture: variational principles and staggered FE implementation. Int J Fract 178:113–129
Hofacker M, Miehe C (2013) A phase-field model of dynamic fracture: robust field updates for the analysis of complex crack patterns. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93:276–301
Schlüter A, Willenbücher A, Kuhn C, Müller R (2014) Phase field approximation of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Mech 54:1141–1161
Gurtin ME (1996) Generalized Ginzburg–Landau and Cahn–Hilliard equations based on a microforce balance. Phys D 92(3–4):178–192
Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, de Vree JHP (1996) Gradient-enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:3391–3403
Kachanov LM (1986) Introduction to continuum damage mechanics. Springer, Netherlands
Murakami S (2012) Continuum damage mechanics. Springer Science and Business Media, Netherlands
Simo JC, Ju JW (1987) Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models: I. Formulation. Int J Solids Struct 23:821–840
Mazars J (1986) A description of micro- and macro-scale damage of concrete structures. J Eng Fract Mech 25:729–737
de Vree JHP, Brekelmans WAM, Gils MAJ (1995) Comparison of nonlocal approaches in continuum damage mechanics. Comput Struct 55:581–588
Pijaudier-Cabot G, Baz̆ant ZP (1987) Nonlocal damage theory. J Eng Mech 118:1512–1533
Baz̆ant ZP, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1988) Nonlocal continuum damage, localization instability and convergence. ASME J Appl Mech 55:287–293
Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1989) Continuum damage theory: application to concrete. ASCE J Eng Mech 115:345–365
Pijaudier-Cabot G, Huerta A (1991) Finite element analysis of bifurcation in nonlocal strain softening solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 90:905–919
Verhoosel CV, de Borst R (2013) A phase-field model for cohesive fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 96:43–62
Burke S, Ortner C, Süli E (2010) An adaptive finite element approximation of a variational model of brittle fracture. SIAM J Numer Anal 48:980–1012
Winkler B (2001) Traglastuntersuchungen von unbewehrten und bewehrten Betonstrukturen auf der Grundlage eines objektiven Werkstoffgesetzes für Beton, Dissertation. University of Innsbruck, Austria
Bittencourt TN, Wawrzynek PA, Ingraffea AR, Sousa JL (1996) Quasi-automatic simulation of crack propagation for 2d LEFM problems. Eng Fract Mech 55:321–334
Saxena A, Hudak SJ (1987) Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens. Int J Fract 14:453–468
Watanabe T (2011) Analytical research on method for applying interfacial fracture mechanics to evaluate strength of cementitious adhesive interfaces for thin structural finish details. In: Cuppoletti J (ed) Nanocomposites with unique properties and applications in medicine and industry, pp 67–82, ISBN: 978-953-307-351-4
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the European Research Council, ERC Starting Researcher Grant INTERFACES, Grant Agreement No. 279439. The assistance of Dr. Roland Kruse (Institute of Applied Mechanics, TU Braunschweig) with the experimental tests for example 6 in Sect. 4 is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ambati, M., Gerasimov, T. & De Lorenzis, L. A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. Comput Mech 55, 383–405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y