Abstract
Key message
Mutational witches’ broom clones show a growth redistribution compared with normal clones. The main factor affecting the variations in mutant clone morphology is the strength of the mutation.
Abstract
Mutational witches’ broom is a fragment of the tree crown with abnormally dense branching and slower shoot growth, compared with those of a normal crown. Thousands of dwarf ornamental cultivars widely used in landscape design have been developed from mutational witches’ broom. In this study, crown morphology was compared between grafted clones of witches’ broom and normal clones from the same trees. The results quantify variations in crown structure between the mutants and normal clones. The sample materials were 10 pairs of grafted witches’ broom and normal crown clones of Pinus sibirica. The mutant and normal clones were discrete sets. Many morphological traits were affected in the mutants. Compared with the normal-crown clones, the mutants showed male sterility, decreased apical dominance, reduced shoot and needle length, and increased branching and seed cone bearing. In terms of morphogenic changes induced by the mutation, the shoots of the witches’ broom clones were bicyclic, generated seed cones that were much shorter than those of normal clones, and had acquired the ability to form lateral buds. The extent of interclonal variation was significantly greater among witches’ broom clones than among normal clones. Compared with the morphological traits of normal clones, those of the mutants were shifted in the same direction but to different extents. Therefore, mutational witches’ broom is the expression of a mutation that can be weak, medium, or strong. These results will be useful for unraveling the genetic basis of witches’ broom in conifers and for breeding new dwarf cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RM, Scarbrough NM (1970) Morphology and length correlated in terminal flushes of longleaf pine saplings. Research paper SO-53. USDA
Auders AG, Spicer DP (2012) Royal Horticultural Society encyclopedia of conifers: a comprehensive guide to cultivars and species. Royal Horticultural Society, London
Badoux H (1898) Abbildung des Hexenbesens der Weymouthskiefer. Naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Forst- und Landwirtschaft 7:195
Brown CL, Sommer HE, Wetzstein H (1994) Morphological and histological differences in the development of dwarf mutants of sexual and somatic origin in diverse woody taxa. Trees 9:61–66
Buckland DC, Kuijt J (1957) Unexplained brooming of Douglas-fir and other conifers in British Columbia and Alberta. For Sci 3:236–242
Cannell MGR, Morgan J (1990) Theoretical study of variables affecting the export of assimilates from branches of Picea. Tree Physiol 6:257–266
Cato S, McMillan L, Donaldson L, Richardson T, Echt C, Gardner R (2006) Wood formation from the base to the crown in Pinus radiata: gradients of tracheid wall thickness, wood density, radial growth rate and gene expression. Plant Mol Biol 60:565–581
Childs TW (1968) Elytroderma disease of ponderosa pine in the Pacific Northwest. Research paper PNW-69. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA
Domagalska MA, Leyser O (2011) Signal integration in the control of shoot branching. Nature Reviews Mol Cell Biol 12:211–221
Duffield J, Wheat J (1963) Dwarf seedlings from broomed douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 12:129–133
Farjon A (2010) Handbook of the World’s Conifers. Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden
Fernandez H, Fraga MF, Bernard P, Revilla MA (2003) Quantification of GA1, GA3, GA4, GA7, GA9, and GA20 in vegetative and male cone buds from juvenile and mature trees of Pinus radiata. Plant Growth Regul 40:185–188
Fincham RL (2003) Conifer cultivars of north america from 1932 into the next millennium. In: Mill RR (ed) Proceedings of the fourth international conifer conference: conifers for the future?. International Society for Horticultural Science, Leuven, pp 247–264
Fordham AJ (1967) Dwarf conifers from witches’-brooms. Arnoldia 24:29–50
Fridborg I, Kuusk S, Moritz T, Sundberg E (1999) The Arabidopsis dwarf mutant shi exhibits reduced gibberellin responses conferred by overexpression of a new putative zinc finger protein. Plant Cell 11:1019–1032
Gatsuk LE, Smirnova OV, Vorontzova LI, Zaugolnova LB, Ztiukova LA (1980) Age states of plants of various growth forms: a review. J Ecol 68:675–696
Ghosh DK, Das AK, Singh S, Singh SJ, Ahlawat YS (1999) Association of a phytoplasma with witches’ broom, a new disease of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia). Curr Sci 77:174–177
Goroshkevich SN (1990) Correlation between growth and sex transformation during development of Siberian stone pine branches. Ontogenez 21:207–214
Goroshkevich SN (1993) Differences in phenology of organogenesis as a factor in differentiation of the crown of Siberian stone pine into generative stories. J Plant Physiol 40:278–282
Goroshkevich SN, Menyailo LN (1996) Phytohormonal gradients as a factor controlling the differentiation of cedar pine crowns into generative storeys. Rus J Plant Physiol 43:208–212
Goroshkevich SN, Velisevich SN (2000) Crown structure in Siberian Cedar (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) during generative stage of ontogenesis. Krylovia 2:110–122
Grasso V (1969) Dwarf seedlings from witches’ brooms of Pinus halepensis. Italia forestale e montana 24:241–245
Hogenhout SA, Oshima K, Ammar el D, Kakizawa S, Kingdom HN, Namba S (2008) Phytoplasmas: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects. Mol Plant Pathol 9:403–423
Ishii H, McDowell N (2002) Age-related development of crown structure in coastal Douglas-fir trees. For Ecol Manag 169:257–270
Ito K, Hamma T (1964) Witches brooms of some conifers in Japan. Bulletin of the Government Forest Experimental Station Meguro 171:109–128
Johnson AG, Pauley SS, Cromell WH (1968) Pine dwarf segregates from witches’-brooms. Proc Int Plant Propag Soc 18:265–270
Khirov AA (1973) Witches’ broom on Pinus sylvestris. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 58:433–436
Korovin VV, Novitskaya LL, Kurnosov GA (2003) Structural abnormalities of the stem in woody plants, 2nd edn. Moscow State Forest University, Moscow
Kozlowski TT (1971) Growth and development of trees: seed germination, ontogeny and shoot growth. Academic Press Inc., New-York
Kull O, Tulva I (2002) Shoot structure and growth along a vertical profile within a Populus-Tilia canopy. Tree Physiol 22:1167–1175
Lanner RM (1976) Patterns of shoot development in Pinus and their relationship to growth potential. In: Cannell MGR, Last FT (eds) Tree phisiology and yield improvement. Academic Press, London, pp 223–243
Liernur AGM (1927) Hexenbesen: ihre morphologie, anatomie und entstehung. Nijgh en Van Ditmar, Rotterdam
Lockhart BR, Weih RC Jr, Smith KM (2005) Crown radius and diameter at breast height relationships for six bottomland hardwood species. J Ark Acad Sci 59:110–115
Loubère M, Saint-André L, Hervé JC, Vestøl GI (2004) Relationships between stem size and branch basal diameter variability in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) from two regions of France. Ann For Sci 61:525–535
Mayr S, Schwienbacher F, Beikircher B, Dämon B (2010) Damage in needle tissues after infection with Chrysomyxa rhododendri increases cuticular conductance of Picea abies in winter. Protoplasma 243:137–143
Momose Y (1967) Segregation of witches’ broom symptoms of Pinus densiflora in wind-pollinated seedlings. J Jpn For Soc 49:66–68
Morgan J, Cannell MGR (1988) Support costs of different branch designs: effects of position, number, angle and deflection of laterals. Tree Physiol 4:301–313
Morris JW, Doumas P, Morris RO, Zaerr JB (1990) Cytokinins in vegetative and reproductive buds of Pseudotsuga menziesii. Plant Physiol 93:67–71
Nevalainen S, Lindgren M, Pouttu A, Heinonen J, Hongisto M, Neuvonen S (2009) Extensive tree health monitoring networks are useful in revealing the impacts of widespread biotic damage in boreal forests. Environ Monit Assess 168:159–171
Noguchi T, Fujioka Sh, Choe S, Takatsuto S, Yoshida Sh, Yuan H, Feldmann KA, Tax FE (1999) Brassinosteroid-insensitive dwarf mutants of Arabidopsis accumulate brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol 121:743–752
Noskov VI, Negrutzkiy SF (1956) About origin of witches’ brooms in Scotch pine. Sci Notes Voronezh For Eng Inst 15:207–211
Odén PC, Wang Q, Högberg KA, Werner M (1995) Transport and metabolism of gibberellins in relation to flower bud differentiation in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Tree Physiol 15:451–456
Oner N, Dogan HH, Ozturk C, Gurer M (2009) Determination of fungal diseases, site and stand characteristics in mixed stands in Ilgaz-Yenice forest district, Cankiri, Turkey. J Environ Biol 30:567–575
Peterson RS (1961) Host alternation of spruce broom rust. Science 134:468–469
Peterson RS (1963) Effects of broom rusts on spruce and fir. Research Paper INT-7. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, USDA
Samofal SA (1940) Bud mutation in Scotch pine. Sci Notes Voronezh For Eng Inst 6:28–34
Shahba MA, Bauerle WL (2009) Growth temperature modulates the spatial variability of leaf morphology and chemical elements within crowns of climatically divergent Acer rubrum genotypes. Tree Physiol 29:869–877
Shul’ga VV (1979) Nature of dwarf trees and “witches’ broom” in Scotch pine. Lesovedenie 3:82–86
Sone K, Noguchi K, Terashima I (2006) Mechanical and ecophysiological significance of the form of a young Acer rufinerve tree: vertical gradient in branch mechanical properties. Tree Physiol 26:1549–1558
Sumida A, Miyaura T, Torii H (2013) Relationships of tree height and diameter at breast height revisited: analyses of stem growth using 20-year data of an even-aged Chamaecyparis obtusa stand. Tree Physiol 33:106–118
von Tubeuf K (1905) Hexenbesen der Fichte. Naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Forst- und Landwirtschaft 3:253–255
Vrgoc P (2002) Witches’ broom of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) and its use for new ornamentals. In: Van Huylenbroeck J et al, (eds) Proceedings of XX International Eucarpia Symposium, Section Ornamentals, Strategies for New Ornamentals—Part II, pp 199–205
Wakushima S, Yoshioka H, Sakurai N (1996) Lateral female strobili production in Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc.) clone by exogenous cytokinin application. J For Res 1:143–148
Waxman S (1975) Witches’-brooms’ sources of new and interesting dwarf forms of Picea, Pinus, and Tsuga species. Acta Hortic Symp Propag Arboric 54:25–32
Waxman S (1987) Dwarf conifers from witches’ volatile components and fatty acids in a CO extract brooms. Comb Proc Int Plant Propag Soc 36:131–136
Wittmack L (1886) Hexenbesen an einer Kieferv. Garten-Zeitung 30:116–131
Yamburov MS, Goroshkevich SN (2007) Witches’-brooms in Siberian stone pine as somatic mutations: occurrence, features and possibility of using in breeding programs. Khvoynyye borealnoy zony 24:317–324
Yamburov MS, Titova KG (2013) Needle anatomy of mutational witches’ brooms of Siberian Fir. World Appl Sci J 28:909–913
Yea L, Liua L, Xingb A, Kanga D (2013) Characterization of a dwarf mutant allele of Arabidopsis MDR-like ABC transporter AtPGP1 gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 441:782–786
Yun HY, Hong SG, Rossman AY, Lee SK, Lee KJ, Bae KS (2009) The rust fungus Gymnosporangium in Korea including two new species G. monticola and G. unicorne. Mycologia 101:790–809
Zilins J, Lapse J, Svilans A (2008) Investigation of conifers mutation forms in Latvia and the possibilities in selecting new sorts. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 114: 31–33
Author contribution statement
E. Zhuk: drafting of manuscript, acquisition of data and interpretation of data analysis. G. Vasilyeva: analysis of data. S. Goroshkevich: study conception and design, making of clone collection.
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research [grant number 14-04-31071-mol-a] and Program of basic research in state academies 2013-2020 [Theme 52.2.6].
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by U. Luettge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuk, E., Vasilyeva, G. & Goroshkevich, S. Witches’ broom and normal crown clones from the same trees of Pinus sibirica: a comparative morphological study. Trees 29, 1079–1090 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1187-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1187-2