Abstract
Birth defects are a major cause of infant mortality and disability in many parts of the world. Yet the etiology of neural tube defects (NTDs), the most common types of birth defects, is still unknown. The construction and analysis of maps of disease incidence data can help explain the geographical distribution of NTDs and can point to possible environmental causes of these birth defects. We compared two methods of mapping spatial relative risk of NTDs: (1) hierarchical Bayesian model, and (2) Spatial filtering method. Heshun county, which has the highest rate of NTDs in China, was selected as the region of interest. Both methods were used to produce a risk map of NTDs for rural Heshun for 1998–2001. Hierarchical Bayesian model estimated the relative risk for any given village in Heshun by “borrowing” strength from other villages in the study region. It did not remove all the random spatial noise in the rude disease rate. There were several areas of high incidence scattered around its risk map with no readily apparent pattern. The spatial filtering method calculated the relative risk for all villages based on a series of circulars. The risk map from the spatial filtering method revealed some spatial clusters of NTDs in Heshun. These two methods differed in their ability to map the spatial relative risk of NTDs. Distributional assumption of relative risk and the target of the risk assessment should be taken into consideration when choosing which method to use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin L, Lozano N, Koschinsky J (2006) Rate transformations and smoothing. Report of spatial analysis laboratory. http://www.sal.uiuc.edu/stuff/stuff-sum/pdf/smoothing_06.pdf
Bai HX, Ge Y, Wang JF, Liao YL (2010) Using rough set theory to identify villages affected by birth defects: the example of Heshun, Shanxi, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(4):559–576
Berke O (2005) Exploratory spatial relative risk mapping. Prev Vet Med 71:173–182
Besag JE, Green PJ, Higdon DM, Mengersen KL (1995) Bayesian computation and stochastic systems (with discussion). Stat Sci 10:3–66
Canales RA, Leckie JO (2007) Application of a stochastic model to estimate children’s short-term residential exposure to lead. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:737–745
Carmona RH (2005) The global challenges of birth defects and disabilities. Lancet 366:1142–1144
Carrat F, Valleron AJ (1992) Epidemiologic mapping using the “Kriging” method: application to an influenza-like epidemic in France. Am J Epidemiol 135(11):1293–1300
Christakos G, Bogaert P, Serre ML (2002) Temporal GIS. With CD-ROM. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
Cressie N, Buxton BE, Calder CA, Craigmile PF, Dong C, McMillan NJ, Morara M, Santner TJ, Wang K, Young G, Zhang J (2007) From sources to biomarkers: a hierarchical Bayesian approach for human exposure modeling. J Stat Plan Inference 137:3361–3379
Demichelis F, Magni P, Piergiorgi P, Rubin MA, Bellazzi R (2006) A hierarchical Naïve Bayes model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays. BMC Bioinform 7:514–525
Esra O, Bryan LW, Su YK, Melina SM (2005) Comparison of spatial scan statistic and spatial filtering in estimating low birth weight clusters. Int J Health Geogr 4:19
Frey L, Hauser WA (2003) Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Epilepsia 44:4–13
Gu X, Lin LM, Zheng XY, Zhang T, Song XM, Wang JF, Li XH, Li PZ, Chen G, Wu JL, Wu LH, Liu JF (2007) High prevalence of NTDs in Shanxi province: a combined epidemiological approach. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 79:702–707
Haining R (2003) Hierarchical Bayesian models. In: Haining R (ed) Spatial data analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hemmi I (2008) Bayesian estimation of the incidence rate in birth defects monitoring. Congenit Anom 28(2):103–109
Ismaila AS, Canty A, Thabane L (2007) Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches in modeling risk of preterm birth near the Sydney Tar Ponds, Nova Scotia, Canada. BMC Med Res Method 7:39–52
Li Z, Gorman DM, Horel S (2006a) Hierarchical Bayesian spatial models for alcohol availability, drug “hot spots” and violent crime. Int J Health Geogr 5:54–65
Li ZW, Ren AG, Zhang L, Guo ZY, Li Z (2006b) A population-based case-control study of risk factors for neural tube defects in four high-prevalence areas of Shanxi province, China. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:43–53
Liao YL, Wang JF, Li XH, Guo YQ, Zheng XY (2009) Identifying environmental risk factors for human neural tube defects before and after folic acid supplementation. BMC Public Health 9:391
Maiti T (1998) Hierarchical Bayes estimation of mortality rates for disease mapping. J Stat Plan Inference 69:339–348
Mollie A (1995) Bayesian mapping of disease. In: Gilks W, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D (eds) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Champman and Hall, London, pp 359–379
Rushton G, Lolonis P (1996) Exploratory spatial analysis of birth defect rates in an urban population. Stat Med 15:717–726
Sankoh OA, Berke O, Simboro S, Becher H (2002) Bayesian and GIS mapping of childhood mortality in rural Burkina Faso. Control of tropical infectious diseases. Uni-Heidelberg discussion paper
Short M, Carlin BP, Bushhouse S (2002) Using hierarchical spatial models for cancer control planning in Minnesota (United States). Cancer Causes Control 13:903–916
Staubach C, Schmid V, Knorr-Held L, Ziller M (2002) A Bayesian model for spatial wildlife disease prevalence data. Prev Vet Med 56:75–87
Talbot TO, Kulldorff M, Forand SP, Haley VB (2000) Evaluation of spatial filters to create smoothed maps of health data. Stat Med 19(17–18):2399–2408
Wang JF, Li XH, Christakos G, Liao YL, Zhang T, Gu X, Zheng XY (2010) Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(1):107–127
Wiwanitkit V (2008) Estimating cancer risk due to benzene exposure in some urban areas in Bangkok. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:135–137
Wu JL, Wang JF, Meng B, Chen G, Pang LH, Song XM, Zhang KL, Zhang T, Zheng XY (2004) Exploratory spatial data analysis for the identification of risk factors to birth defects. BMC Public Health 4:23–33
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the CAS (KZCX2-YW-308), MOST (2009ZX10602-01-04, 2007AA12Z241, 2007DFC20180), and NSFC (70571076 & 40471111). The authors also thank Ms Li Zhao for collecting the socio-economic data of the study area.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Appendix: Hierarchical Bayesian model definition in WinBUGS
Appendix: Hierarchical Bayesian model definition in WinBUGS
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, YL., Wang, JF., Wu, JL. et al. A comparison of methods for spatial relative risk mapping of human neural tube defects. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25, 99–106 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0439-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0439-3