Abstract
The nature of canopy radiative transfer mechanism (CRTM) describes the amount of beam penetration through a canopy and governs the nature of canopy illumination, i.e. the abundance of sunlit and shaded portions. Realistic representation of canopy illumination is critical for simulating various canopy biophysical processes associated with vegetated land surfaces. The adequate representation of CRTM can be attributed to the parameterizations of the two main canopy characteristics: the foliage projection (G-function) and the clumping effect (Ω function). Herein, using various types of G and Ω functions developed in a previous study, I tested 15 CRTM scenarios that combine different types of G and Ω functions to predict the dynamics of sunlit fraction (ε) of canopies having a wide range of plant area index (Ptotal) at various solar zenith angles (SZAs). It was observed that, for a given Ptotal, ε decreases as the SZA increases. However, ε significantly changed in accordance with the type of G and Ω functions used. Scenarios that employed random distribution of elements in space (S-4, S-9, and S-14) consistently returned larger ε values even at lower SZAs. This means that ignoring the clumping behavior of canopies could result in greater proportion of sunlit elements thereby reducing the beam penetration deeper into the canopy as opposed to those canopies where the elements are more aggregated. Beyond 70° SZA, almost all the scenarios returned similar ε values for a given Ptotal, which implied that the methods used is less sensitive at higher SZAs. The values of ε calculated by all the scenarios were significantly different from the S-6 (the ideal case). This observation highlights the importance of explicitly describing the G and Ω functions to adequately depict canopy illumination conditions.
References
Anisimov O, Fukshansky L (1997) Optics of vegetation: implications for the radiation balance and photosynthetic performance. Agric For Meteorol 85(1–2):33–49
Alton PB, Ellis R, Los SO, North PR (2007) Improved global simulations of gross primary product based on a separate and explicit treatment of diffuse and direct sunlight. J Geophys Res 112, D07203. doi:10.1029/2006JD008022
Baldocchi DD, Hutchison BA, Matt DR, McMillen RT (1985) Canopy radiative-transfer models for spherical and known leaf inclination angle distributions: a test in an oak hickory forest. J Appl Ecol 22(2):539–555
Berbigier P, Bonnefond J-M (1995) Measurements and modeling of radiation transmission within a stand of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aït.). Ann des Sci forestières 52:23–42
Bonan GB (1989) A computer-model of the solar-radiation, soil-moisture, and soil thermal regimes in boreal forests. Ecol Model 45:275–306
Campbell GS (1990) Derivation of an angle density-function for canopies with ellipsoidal leaf angle distributions. Agric For Meteorol 49(3):173–176
Chen JM (1996) Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation in leaf area index of boreal conifer forests. Agric For Meteorol 80:135–163
Chen JM, Mo G, Pisek J, Liu J, Deng F, Ishizawa M, Chan D (2012) Effects of foliage clumping on the estimation of global terrestrial gross primary productivity, Global Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB1019. doi:10.1029/2010GB003996
Chen JM, Liu J, Cihlar J, Guolden ML (1999) Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications. Ecol Model 124:99–119
Chen JM, Rich PM, Gower TS, Norman JM, Plummer S (1997) Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements. J Geophys Res 102:29,429–29,444
Chen JM, Black TA (1991) Measuring leaf-area index of plant canopies with branch architecture. Agric For Meteorol 57(1–3):1–12
Chen JM, Menges CH, Leblanc SG (2005) Global mapping of foliage clumping index using multi-angular satellite data. Remote Sensing Environ 97(4):447–457
De Pury DGG, Farquhar GD (1997) Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant, Cell Environ 20:537–557. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1997.00094.x
Dickinson RE, Sellers AH, Kennedy PJ, Wilson MF (1986) ‘Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) for the NCAR community climate model’, InNCAR Tech. Note TN-275, National Center for Atmosphere Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Fassnacht KS, Gower ST, Norman JM, Mcmirtrie RE (1994) A comparison of optical and direct methods in estimating foliage surface area in forests. Agric For Meteorol 71:183–207
Goel NS, Strebel DE (1984) Simple beta distribution representation of leaf orientation in vegetation canopies. Agrono J 76(5):800–802
Govind A, Guyon D, Roujean J-L, Yauschew-Raguenes N, Kumari J, Pisek P, Wigneron J-P (2013) Effects of canopy architectural parameterizations on the modeling of radiative transfer mechanism. Ecol Model 251(2013):114–126
Govind A, Chen JM, McDonnell J, Kumari J, Sonnentag O (2010) Effect of lateral hydrological processes on photosynthesis and evapotranspiration. Ecohydrology.3. (doi: 10.1002/eco.141).
Govind A, Chen JM, Margolis H, Ju W, Sonnentag O, Giasson MA (2009a) A spatially explicit hydro-ecological modeling framework (BEPS-TerrainLab V2.0): model description and test in a boreal ecosystem in Eastern North America. J Hydrol 367:200–216. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.006
Govind A, Chen JM, Ju W (2009b) Spatially explicit simulation of hydrologically controlled carbon and nitrogen cycles and associated feedback mechanisms in a boreal ecosystem. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, G02006. doi:10.1029/2008JG000728
Govind A, Chen JM, Bernier PY, Margolis H, Guindon L, Beaudoin A (2011) Spatially distributed modeling of the long-term carbon balance of a boreal landscape. Ecological Modeling 222(15):2780–2795
Kucharik CJ, Norman JM, Gower ST (1999) Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach. Tree Physiology 19(11):695–706
Lang ARG, Xiang Y (1986) Estimation of leaf area index from transmission of direct sunlight in discontinuous canopies. Agric For Meteorol 37(3):229–243
Lemeur R, Blad BL (1974) A critical review of light models for estimating the shortwave radiation regime of plant canopies. Agric Meteorol 14(255):286
Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany 14:22–52
Nilson T, Ross J (1997) Modeling radiative transfer through forest canopies: implications for canopy photosynthesis and remote sensing. The use of remote sensing in the modeling of forest productivity, pp. 23–60
Nilson T (1971) Theoretical analysis of frequency of gaps in plant stands. Agric Meteorol 8(1):25–38
Norman JM (1982) Simulation of microclimates. In: Hatfield JL, Thomason IJ (eds) Biometeorology in Integrated Pest Management. Academic, San Diego, Calif, pp 65–99
Pisek J, Chen JM, Nilson T (2011) Estimation of vegetation clumping index using MODIS BRDF data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32(9):2645–2657
Ross J (1981) The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. Dr. W. Junk, Norwell, Mass., USA, p. 391
Stenberg P, Linder S, Smolander H, Flower-Ellis J (1994) Performance of the LAI- (2000) Plant canopy analyzer in estimating leaf area index of some Scotspine stands. Tree Physiology 14:981–995
Sterck FJ, Schieving F (2007) 3-D growth patterns of trees: effects of carbon economy, meristem activity, and selection. Ecol Monogr 77:405–420. doi:10.1890/06-1670.1
Walter J-MN, Fournier RA, Soudani K, Meyer E (2003) Integrating clumping effects in forest canopy structure: an assessment through hemispherical photographs. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29:388–410
Wang Y-P, Leuning R (1998) A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis, and partitioning of available energy I: model description and comparison with a multi-layered model. Agric For Meteorol 91:89–111. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00061-6
Zhang YQ, Chen JM, Miller JR (2005) Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation. Agric For Meteorol 133(1–4):166–181
Acknowledgments
Prof. Jing Chen (U of Toronto) is acknowledged for inspiring me with his works on CRTM. I thank Dr. Jean-Louis Roujean (CNRM), Dr. Jyothi Kumari, Mr. Alain Kruszewski and Ms. Sylvia Dayau (EPHYSE) who helped me to collect Ω in the experimental campaign mentioned in Govind et al. (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Govind, A. On the nature of canopy illumination due to differences in elemental orientation and aggregation for radiative transfer. Int J Biometeorol 58, 1803–1809 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0769-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0769-1