Skip to main content
Log in

Global complete observability and output-to-state stability imply the existence of a globally convergent observer

  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider systems which are globally completely observable and output-to-state stable. The former property guarantees the existence of coordinates such that the dynamics can be expressed in observability form. The latter property guarantees the existence of a state norm observer and therefore the possibility of bounding any continuous state functions. Both properties allow to conceptually build an observer from an approximation of an exponentially attractive invariant manifold in the space of the system state and an output driven dynamic extension. The proposed observer provides convergence to zero of the estimation error within the domain of definition of the solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angeli D, Sontag E (1999) Forward completeness, unboundedness observability, and their Lyapunov characterizations. Syst Control Lett 38:209–217

    Google Scholar 

  2. Besançon G (1998) State affine systems and observer-based control. In: Proceedings of IFAC nonlinear control systems designs symposium, Enschede, The Netherlands, July 1998, pp 399–404

  3. Chen C-T (1984) Linear systems theory and design. Holt (Rinehart and Winston), New York

  4. Ciccarella G, Dalla Mora M, Germani A (1993) A Luenberger-like observer for nonlinear systems. Int J Control 57(3):537–556

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deheuvels P (1980) L'intégrale. Presses universitaires de France, Paris

  6. Engel R, Kreisselmeier G (2002) A continuous-time observer which converges in finite time. IEEE Trans Automat Control 47(7):1202–1204

    Google Scholar 

  7. Filippov A (1988) Differential equations with discontinuous right hand sides. Mathematics and its applications, Kluwer, Dordrecht

  8. Gauthier J-P, Kupka I (1994) Observability and observers for nonlinear systems. SIAM J Control Optim 32(4) 975–994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gauthier J-P, Kupka I (2001) Deterministic observation theory and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  10. Gauthier J-P, Hammouri H, Kupka I (1992) A simple observer for nonlinear systems, application to bioreactor. IEEE Trans Automat Control 37:875–880

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hammouri H, de Leon Morales J (1991) On systems equivalence and observer synthesis. In: Proceedings of joint conference, Genoa, Italy, pp 341–347

  12. Isidori A (1999) Nonlinear control systems II. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  13. Jiang Z-P, Praly L (1998) Design of robust adaptive controllers for nonlinear systems with dynamic uncertainties. Automatica 34(7):835–840

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kazantzis N, Kravaris C (1998) Nonlinear observer design using Lyapunov's auxiliary theorem. Systems & Control Lett 34:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khalil HK, Esfandiari F (1993) Semiglobal stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems using output feedback. IEEE Trans Automat Control 38:1412–1415

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kreisselmeier G, Engel R (2003) Nonlinear observers for autonomous Lipschitz continuous systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control 48(3):451–464

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krener A, Isidori A (1983) Linearization by output injection and nonlinear observers. Syst Control Lett 3:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krener A, Respondek W (1985) Nonlinear observers with linearizable error dynamics. SIAM J Control Optim 23(2):197–216

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luenberger D (1964) Observing the state of a linear system. IEEE Trans Mil Electron MIL-8:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mazenc F, Praly L, Dayawansa WP (1994) Global stabilization by output feedback: Examples and Counter-Examples. Syst Control Lett 23:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nicosia S, Tornambè A (1989) High-gain observers in the state and parameter estimation of robots having elastic joints. Syst Control Lett 13:331–337

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sontag E, Wang Y (1996) New characterizations of input-to-state stability. IEEE Trans Automat Control 41(9)1283–1294

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sontag E, Wang Y (1997) Output-to-state stability and detectability of nonlinear systems. Syst Control Lett 29:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teel A, Praly L (1994) Global stabilizability and observability imply semi-global stabilizability by output feedback. Syst Control Lett 22:313–325

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teel A, Praly L (2000) A smooth Lyapunov function from a class-KL estimate involving two positive semi-definite functions. ESAIM: Control Optim Calc Var 5:313–367

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao M-Q, Krener AJ (2002) Design of reduced-order observers of nonlinear systems through change of coordinates. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE conference on decision and control

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Astolfi.

Additional information

The work of A. Astolfi is partly supported by the Leverhulme Trust.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Astolfi, A., Praly, L. Global complete observability and output-to-state stability imply the existence of a globally convergent observer. Math. Control Signals Syst. 18, 32–65 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-005-0161-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-005-0161-8

Keywords

Navigation