Abstract
A method for the decomposition of single-channel unaveraged magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data into statistically independent components is presented. The study of MEG recordings is characterised by a host of difficulties, most of which stem from the inherently noisy recording process by which the data is obtained. MEG time series typically contain a mix of artifactual components from a variety of sources, and the isolation of interesting signals from this noise background poses a difficult problem. In this article, we present a novel approach combining the techniques of independent component analysis (ICA) and dynamical embedding, which can be used to extract and isolate components of interest from single-channel unaveraged MEG data. In our approach, the method of delays is proposed as a means of augmenting the single-channel data, thus, facilitating the application of ICA. Finally, because the single-channel approach yields no information regarding the physiological origins of extracted sources, we discuss a method by which extracted sources may be projected back into the multichannel measurement space, permitting an estimate of the respective spatial distributions to be obtained. The proposed methods are tested on three separate MEG channels and the results are presented and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Comon P (1994) Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process 36(3):287–314
Hyvarinen A, Oja E (2000) Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw 13:411–430
Makeig S, Bell AJ, Jung TP, Sejnowski TJ (1996) Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 8:145–151
Vigario R, Jousmaki V, Hamalainen M, Hari R, Oja E (1998) Independent component analysis for identification of artifacts in magnetoencephalographic recordings. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 10:229–235
Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand DA, Young LS (eds) Dynamical systems and turbulence, Warwick 1980. Lect Notes Math 898:366–381
Hyvarinen A, Oja E (1997) A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput 9:1483–1492
Casdagli MC, Iasemidis LD, Sackellares JC, Roper SN, Gilmore RL, Savit RS (1996) Characterizing nonlinearity in invasive EEG recordings from temporal lobe epilepsy. Physica D 99:381–399
Palus M (1996) Nonlinearity in normal human EEG: cycles, temporal asymmetry, nonstationarity and randomness, not chaos. Biol Cybern 75(5):389–396
Theiler J, Rapp PE (1996) Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional, nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 98:213
James C, Lowe D (2000) Using dynamical embedding to isolate seizure components in the ictal EEG. IEE Proc Sci Meas Technol 147(6):315–320
Kugiumtzis D (1996) State space reconstruction parameters in the analysis of chaotic time series—the role of the time window length. Physica D 95:13–28
Golyandina N, Nekrutkin V, Zhigljavsky A (2001) Analysis of time series structure: SSA and related techniques. Chapman and Hall, London
James C, Lowe D (2001) Single channel analysis of electromagnetic brain signals through ICA in a dynamical systems framework. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBS), Istanbul, Turkey, October 2001
Woon WL, Lowe D (2001) A nonlinear dynamical systems approach to MEG signal processing: an example of brain source elicitation. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on neural networks and expert systems in medicine and healthcare (NNESMED 2001), Milos Island, Greece, June 2001
Başar E, Başar-Eroglu C, Karakaş S, Schürmann M (1999) Are cognitive processes manifested in event-related gamma, alpha, theta and delta oscillations in the EEG? Neurosci Lett 259:165–168
Pernier J, Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O (1999) A ring-shaped distribution of dipoles as a source model of induced gamma-band activity. Clin Neurophysiol 110:660–665
Acknowledgements
The research detailed in this paper has been sponsored by the UK EPSRC grant GR/L94673. We thank the EPSRC for supporting this research. We also wish to thank the staff of the Clinical Neurophysiology Unit at Aston University, Birmingham for much-needed assistance and advice in the MEG data collection process, as well as regarding various MEG theoretical issues in general.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woon, W.L., Lowe, D. Can we learn anything from single-channel unaveraged MEG data?. Neural Comput & Applic 13, 360–368 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0432-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-004-0432-1