Skip to main content
Log in

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: rationale for multidisciplinary treatment

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) appears to be most frequently related to a positive surgical margin and has a poor prognosis after resection. However, few reports are available on differences in tumor characteristics and prognoses among resectable pancreatic cancer (PC), BRPC, and unresectable PC.

Methods

Records of 133 patients resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 185 patients treated as locally advanced PC (LAPC) were reviewed.

Results

Twenty-four patients who initially underwent resection (BRPC-s) and 10 patients who were initially treated as LAPC (BRPC-n) met the criteria for BRPC. Prognosis of BRPC was significantly better than that of unresectable PC, but was significantly worse than that of resectable PC. BRPC-s showed more frequent nerve plexus invasion (P < 0.01), portal vein invasion (P < 0.01), and loco-regional recurrence (P = 0.03) than resectable PC. The positive surgical margin rate was not significantly higher in BRPC-s (29%) than in resectable PC (19%) (P = 0.41).

Conclusions

BRPC had a poorer prognosis with more local failure than resectable PC although prognosis of BRPC was significantly better than that of unresectable PC. Considering the tumor and treatment characteristics, multidisciplinary treatment including resection is required for BRPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, Xiong HQ, Crane CH, Wang H, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(8):1035–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, Sun CC, Lee JE, Fleming JB, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):833–46; discussion 846–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vauthey JN, Dixon E. AHPBA/SSO/SSAT Consensus Conference on Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: rationale and overview of the conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1725–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Volume V.2.2010. Ft. Washington, PA: NCCN; 2010.

  5. Wolff RA, Abbruzzese JL, Evans DB. Neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas. In: Kufe DW, Pollock RE, et al., editors. Holland-Frei cancer medicine, 6th edn. Hamilton, ON: BC Decker; 2003.

  6. Kuhlmann KF, de Castro SM, Wesseling JG, ten Kate FJ, Offerhaus GJ, Busch OR, et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; actual survival and prognostic factors in 343 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(4):549–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams RA, Lowy AM, O’Reilly EM, Wolff RA, Picozzi VJ, Pisters PW. Combined modality treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1751–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cancer IUA. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002.

  9. Kaplan ELMP. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chun YS, Milestone BN, Watson JC, Cohen SJ, Burtness B, Engstrom PF, et al. Defining venous involvement in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(11):2832–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans DB, Farnell MB, Lillemoe KD, Vollmer C Jr, Strasberg SM, Schulick RD. Surgical treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1736–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, Going JJ, Glen P, Dickson EJ, et al. Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2010;251(6):1003–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(6):567–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Dunn JA, Almond J, Beger HG, Pederzoli P, et al. Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2001;234(6):758–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Millikan KW, Deziel DJ, Silverstein JC, Kanjo TM, Christein JD, Doolas A, et al. Prognostic factors associated with resectable adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Am Surg. 1999;65(7):618–23; discussion 623–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang DK, Johns AL, Merrett ND, Gill AJ, Colvin EK, Scarlett CJ, et al. Margin clearance and outcome in resected pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2855–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hernandez J, Mullinax J, Clark W, Toomey P, Villadolid D, Morton C, et al. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy is not improved by extending resections to achieve negative margins. Ann Surg. 2009;250(1):76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagakawa T, Mori K, Nakano T, Kadoya M, Kobayashi H, Akiyama T, et al. Perineural invasion of carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tract. Br J Surg. 1993;80(5):619–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakao A, Harada A, Nonami T, Kaneko T, Takagi H. Clinical significance of carcinoma invasion of the extrapancreatic nerve plexus in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 1996;12(4):357–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitsunaga S, Hasebe T, Iwasaki M, Kinoshita T, Ochiai A, Shimizu N. Important prognostic histological parameters for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer Sci. 2005;96(12):858–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bockman DE, Buchler M, Malfertheiner P, Beger HG. Analysis of nerves in chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1988;94(6):1459–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yi SQ, Miwa K, Ohta T, Kayahara M, Kitagawa H, Tanaka A, et al. Innervation of the pancreas from the perspective of perineural invasion of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2003;27(3):225–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mochizuki K, Gabata T, Kozaka K, Hattori Y, Zen Y, Kitagawa H, et al. MDCT findings of extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion by pancreas head carcinoma: correlation with en bloc pathological specimens and diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(7):1757–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahora K, Kuehrer I, Eisenhut A, Akan B, Koellblinger C, Goetzinger P, et al. NeoGemOx: gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced, nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.048

  26. Landry J, Catalano PJ, Staley C, Harris W, Hoffman J, Talamonti M, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus radiotherapy versus gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil for patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101(7):587–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Takahashi.

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, S., Kinoshita, T., Konishi, M. et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: rationale for multidisciplinary treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18, 567–574 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0371-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0371-z

Keywords

Navigation