Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Pringle maneuver reduces the infusion rate of rocuronium required to maintain surgical muscle relaxation during hepatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We investigated the continuous infusion rates of rocuronium necessary to obtain the surgical muscle relaxation before, during, and after the Pringle maneuver on patients who underwent hepatectomy.

Methods

Fifteen patients were induced by total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. After obtaining the calibration of acceleromyography, the patient was intubated with rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Fifteen minutes after initial rocuronium injection, the continuous infusion was started at 7.5 µg/kg/min. The infusion rate was adjusted every 15 min so that the first twitch height (% T1) might become from 3 to 10% of control. The infusion rates at the time when the state of surgical muscle relaxation was achieved for more than 15 min were recorded before, during and after the Pringle maneuver. The 25% recovery time was measured after discontinuing the continuous infusion.

Results

The infusion rate of rocuronium before, during, and after the Pringle maneuver was 7.2 ± 1.8, 4.2 ± 1.4, and 4.7 ± 1.5 µg/kg/min (mean ± SD), respectively. The rocuronium infusion rate during the Pringle maneuver was decreased about 40% compared to that before this maneuver, and that after completion of the Pringle maneuver was not recovered to that before the Pringle maneuver. The 25% recovery time was 20 ± 7 min.

Conclusion

In case of continuous administration of rocuronium during surgery performing the Pringle maneuver, it was considered necessary to regulate the administration of rocuronium using muscle relaxant monitoring in order to deal with the decrease in muscle relaxant requirement by the Pringle maneuver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Takayama T, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Ozaki H, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion promotes recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Surgery. 1994;115:303–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cata JP, Wang H, Gottumukkala V, Reuben J, Sessler DI. Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:690–701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luan H, Ye F, Wu L, Zhou Y, Jiang J. Perioperative blood transfusion adversely affects prognosis after resection of lung cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2014;14:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pringle JH. Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma. Ann surg. 1908;48:541–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Makuuchi M, Mori T, Gunvén P, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H. Safety of hemihepatic vascular occlusion during resection of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987;164:155–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wierda JMKH., Kleef UW, Lambalk LM, Kloppenburg WD, Agoston S. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of Org 9426; a new non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, in patients anaesthetized with nitrous oxide, halothane and fentanyl. Can J Anaesth. 1991;38:430–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Magorian T, Flannery KB, Miller RD. Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:913–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCoy EP, Mirakhur RK, Maddineni VR, Wierda JM, Proost JH. Pharmacokinetics of rocuronium after bolus and continuous infusion during halothane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khuenl-Brady K, Castagnoli KP, Canfell PC, Caldwell JE, Agoston S, Miller RD. The neuromuscular blocking effects and pharmacokinetics of ORG 9426 and ORG 9616 in the cat. Anesthesiology 1990; 72:669–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Takagi S, Ozaki M, Iwasaki H, Hatano Y, Takeda J. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on neuromuscular blocking action of Org 9426 (rocuronium bromide) infused continuously in Japanese patients (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol) 2006; 55:963–70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kajiura A, Nagata O, Takizawa Y, Nakatomi T, Kodera S, Murayama T. A large individual variation in both the infusion rate and the blood concentration of rocuronium necessary for obtain adequate surgical muscle relaxation during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. J Anesth. 2015;29:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao L, Ramzan I, Baker B. Rocuronium infusion requirements and plasma concentrations at constant levels of neuromuscular paralysis during three phases of liver transplantation. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15:257–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murata F, Iwade M, Hidano G, Tsunoda C, Nagata O, Ozaki M. Recovery from propofol anesthesia is delayed in hepatectomy patients due to altered pharmacodynamics (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol. 2006;55:150–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by departmental funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Kajiura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Anesthesia, Kobe, Japan, June 2017.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kajiura, A., Nagata, O. & Sanui, M. The Pringle maneuver reduces the infusion rate of rocuronium required to maintain surgical muscle relaxation during hepatectomy. J Anesth 32, 409–413 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2498-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2498-4

Keywords

Navigation