Skip to main content
Log in

Population pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and model-based assessment of dosing strategies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Palonosetron is the most recent 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, and its fixed dose of 0.075 mg is indicated for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This study aimed to examine whether fixed dosing is more appropriate than body size-based dosing through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model and model-based simulations.

Methods

Fifty-one adult patients undergoing general anesthesia received single intravenous palonosetron administrations 30 min before the end of surgery. Palonosetron concentrations were measured in blood samples collected at various timepoints within 48 h. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by non-linear mixed-effects modeling, and the area under the curves (AUCs) for fixed dosing and body size-based dosing were simulated.

Results

The pharmacokinetics of palonosetron were best described by the three-compartment model, and lean body weight (LBW) was the most significant covariate for all pharmacokinetic parameters. In a patient with LBW of 40 kg, typical clearance and central volume of distribution were 0.102 L/min and 6.98 L, respectively. In simulations, the overall interindividual variability in AUC (0, 48 h) of fixed dosing was not much higher than that of body size-based dosing. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs (0, 48 h) of fixed dosing were considerably lower in the high-weight subgroup and higher in the low-weight subgroup than the median-weight subgroup. In contrast, LBW-based dosing showed similar AUC distributions among the three subgroups.

Conclusion

LBW-based dosing might be suitable for high-weight patients to avoid possible underdosing. Nevertheless, the current fixed dosing of palonosetron is acceptable for adult patients with normal weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, Kovac A, Kranke P, Meyer TA, Watcha M, Chung F, Angus S, Apfel CC, Bergese SD, Candiotti KA, Chan MT, Davis PJ, Hooper VD, Lagoo-Deenadayalan S, Myles P, Nezat G, Philip BK, Tramer MR, Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N, Investigators I. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2441–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Habib AS, White WD, Eubanks S, Pappas TN, Gan TJ. A randomized comparison of a multimodal management strategy versus combination antiemetics for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:77–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkinson GR. Drug metabolism and variability among patients in drug response. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guidance for Industry. Population pharmacokinetics: United States Food and Drug Administration; 1999. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Guidance/UCM072137.pdf. Accessed 04/04/2018.

  6. Jain D, Jain K, Bala I, Gandhi K. Evaluation of weight-adjusted doses of palonosetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in day care laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: a dose ranging, randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:104–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mould DR, Upton RN. Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2012;1:e6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stoltz R, Parisi S, Shah A, Macciocchi A. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and excretion of intravenous [l4C]-palonosetron in healthy human volunteers. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2004;25:329–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoltz R, Cyong JC, Shah A, Parisi S. Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, in U.S. and Japanese healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:520–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunt TL, Gallagher SC, Cullen MT Jr, Shah AK. Evaluation of safety and pharmacokinetics of consecutive multiple-day dosing of palonosetron in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45:589–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenberg P. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of palonosetron in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a dose-ranging clinical study. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:330–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aloxi (palonosetron HCl) injection prescribing information: Helsinn Healthcare SA; 2015. https://www.aloxi.com/docs/pdf/pi.pdf. Accessed 04/10/2018.

  13. Janmahasatian S, Duffull SB, Ash S, Ward LC, Byrne NM, Green B. Quantification of lean bodyweight. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44:1051–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1098.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pai MP, Paloucek FP. The origin of the "ideal" body weight equations. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:1066–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauer LA, Edwards WA, Dellinger EP, Simonowitz DA. Influence of weight on aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in normal weight and morbidly obese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;24:643–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wahlby U, Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO. Assessment of actual significance levels for covariate effects in NONMEM. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28:231–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ette EI, Ludden TM. Population pharmacokinetic modeling: the importance of informative graphics. Pharm Res. 1995;12:1845–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yafune A, Ishiguro M. Bootstrap approach for constructing confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters. I: a use of bootstrap standard error. Stat Med. 1999;18:581–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13:143–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindbom L, Ribbing J, Jonsson EN. Perl-speaks-NONMEM (PsN)—a Perl module for NONMEM related programming. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;75:85–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mould DR, Upton RN. Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development—part 2: introduction to pharmacokinetic modeling methods. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2013;2:e38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ette EI, Williams PJ, Kim YH, Lane JR, Liu MJ, Capparelli EV. Model appropriateness and population pharmacokinetic modeling. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;43:610–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiong C, Liu G, Ma R, Xue J, Wu A. Efficacy of palonosetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62:1268–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh PM, Borle A, Gouda D, Makkar JK, Arora MK, Trikha A, Sinha A, Goudra B. Efficacy of palonosetron in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)—a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:459–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kovac AL, Eberhart L, Kotarski J, Clerici G, Apfel C, Palonosetron 04-07 Study Group. A randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different doses of palonosetron versus placebo in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting over a 72-hour period. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:439–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Candiotti KA, Kovac AL, Melson TI, Clerici G, Joo Gan T, Palonosetron 04-06 Study Group. A randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different doses of palonosetron versus placebo for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:445–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Muchatuta NA, Paech MJ. Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting: focus on palonosetron. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009;5:21–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheymol G. Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics implications for drug therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39:215–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan DJ, Bray KM. Lean body mass as a predictor of drug dosage. Implications for drug therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994;26:292–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Navari RM. Palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: approval and efficacy. Cancer Manag Res. 2009;1:167–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang LP, Scott LJ. Palonosetron: in the prevention of nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2009;69:2257–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morganroth J, Flaharty KK, Parisi S, Moresino C. Effect of single doses of IV palonosetron, up to 2.25 mg, on the QTc interval duration: a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study in healthy volunteers. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:621–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim HJ, Lee HC, Jung YS, Lee J, Min JJ, Hong DM, Choi EK, Oh S, Jeon Y. Effect of palonosetron on the QTc interval in patients undergoing sevoflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:460–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bataille A, Letourneulx JF, Charmeau A, Lemedioni P, Leger P, Chazot T, Le Guen M, Diemunsch P, Fischler M, Liu N. Impact of a prophylactic combination of dexamethasone-ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting in obese adult patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy during closed-loop propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:898–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mendes MN, Monteiro Rde S, Martins FA. Prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastroplasties: a comparative study among three methods. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009;59:570–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Alwis DP, Aarons L, Palmer JL. Population pharmacokinetics of ondansetron: a covariate analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46:117–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. White PF, Scuderi P. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV): a dose-ranging study involving palonosetron, a potent 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:A703.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea (https://cris.nih.go.kr), prior to patient enrolment under registration number KCT0001254.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seongwook Jeong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No external funding and no competing interests declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S., Kim, I., Pyeon, T. et al. Population pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and model-based assessment of dosing strategies. J Anesth 33, 381–389 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-019-02641-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-019-02641-5

Keywords

Navigation