Abstract
Purpose
To review the literature on different classifications of T2-weighted (T2W) increased signal intensity (ISI) on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
Methods
The authors searched the databases of PubMed and Cochrane for studies that used a categorization of T2W ISI to predict the functional outcome after decompressive surgery for CSM. Selected studies were analyzed for the type of ISI classification used, patient selection, methodology and results. The level of evidence provided by each study was determined.
Results
Twenty-two studies fulfilled our search criteria. There were 11 prospective studies and a total of 1,508 patients were studied. The majority of studies classified ISI based on either the longitudinal extent (12 studies) or the qualitative features of the ISI (10 studies). Three studies used both parameters to classify T2W ISI. Other classifications were based on the position of ISI (1 study), presence of snake-eye appearance on axial MR images (1 study) and signal intensity ratio (SIR) (1 study). Poorer functional outcomes correlated with sharp, intense ISI (6 studies) and multisegmental ISI (5 studies) (Class II evidence). Five of ten studies reported that the regression of ISI postoperatively was associated with better neurological outcomes (Class II evidence).
Conclusions
Methodological variations in previous studies made it difficult to compare studies and results. Both multisegmental T2W ISI and sharp, intense T2W ISI are associated with poorer surgical outcome (Class II evidence). The regression of T2W ISI postoperatively correlates with better functional outcomes (Class II). Future studies on the significance of ISI should ensure use of a uniform grading system, standardized outcome measures and multivariate analyses to control for other preoperative variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff M, Heary R, Holly L, Ryken T, Choudhri T, Vresilovic E, Resnick D (2009) Preoperative patient selection with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and electroencephalography: does the test predict outcome after cervical surgery? J Neurosurg Spine 11(2):119–129
Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP (2010) Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 10(6):475–485
Wada E, Yonenobu K, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Ochi T (1999) Can intramedullary signal change on magnetic resonance imaging predict surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(5):455–456
Chatley A, Kumar R, Jain VK, Behari S, Sahu RN (2009) Effect of spinal cord signal intensity changes on clinical outcome after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11(5):562–567
Chen CJ, Lyu RK, Lee ST, Wong YC, Wang LJ (2001) Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prediction of prognosis with type of intensity. Radiology 221(3):789–794
Yone K, Sakou T, Yanase M, Ijiri K (1992) Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance image evaluations of the spinal cord in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17(10 Suppl):S388–S392
Houten JK, Cooper PR (2003) Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery 52(5):1081–1087
Fernandez de Rota JJ, Meschian S, Fernandez de Rota A, Urbano V, Baron M (2007) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy due to chronic compression: the role of signal intensity changes in magnetic resonance images. J Neurosurg Spine 6(1):17–22
Mastronardi L, Elsawaf A, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante M, Ferrante L (2007) Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 7(6):615–622
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K (2007) MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(15):1675–1678
Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS, Gaikwad S, Pandey RM (2003) Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 3(1):33–45
Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K, Yamasaki D, Nanjo Y (2001) Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(11):1238–1245
Vedantam A, Jonathan A, Rajshekhar V (2011) Association of magnetic resonance imaging signal changes and outcome prediction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 15(6):660–666
Matsuda Y, Miyazaki K, Tada K, Yasuda A, Nakayama T, Murakami H, Matsuo M (1991) Increased MR signal intensity due to cervical myelopathy. Analysis of 29 surgical cases. J Neurosurg 74(6):887
Morio Y, Yamamoto K, Kuranobu K, Murata M, Tuda K (1994) Does increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on MR images due to cervical myelopathy predict prognosis? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113(5):254–259
Takahashi M, Yamashita Y, Sakamoto Y, Kojima R (1989) Chronic cervical cord compression: clinical significance of increased signal intensity on MR images. Radiology 173(1):219–224
Haines SJ (2003) Evidence-based neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 52(1):36–47
Aarabi B, Alden TD, Chestnut RM, Downs JH III, Ecklund JM, Eisenberg HM, Farace E, Florin RE, Jane JA Jr, Kreiger MD, Maas AIR, Narayan RK, Potapov AA, Salazar AM, Shaffrey ME, Walters BC (2001) Management and prognosis of penetrating brain injury. J Trauma 51(Suppl 2):S44–S49
Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(1):1–3
Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(9 Suppl):S37–S46
Schoenfeld AJ, Sieg RN, Li G, Bader JO, Belmont PJ Jr, Bono CM (2011) Outcomes after spine surgery among racial/ethnic minorities: a meta-analysis of the literature. Spine J 11(5):381–388
Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM, McGuire KJ, Warholic N, Harris MB (2010) Computed tomography alone versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of occult injuries to the cervical spine: a meta-analysis. J Trauma 68(1):109–113 discussion 113–104
Riley LH, 3rd, Vaccaro AR, Dettori JR, Hashimoto R (2010) Postoperative dysphagia in anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(9 Suppl):S76–S85
Wupperman R, Davis R, Obremskey WT (2007) Level of evidence in spine compared to other orthopedic journals. Spine 32(3):388–393
Park YS, Nakase H, Kawaguchi S, Sakaki T, Nikaido Y, Morimoto T (2006) Predictors of outcome of surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy: retrospective analysis and prospective study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 46(5):231–238
Papadopoulos C, Katonis P, Papagelopoulos P, Karampekios S, Hadjipavlou A (2004) Surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: correlation between operative outcomes and MRI of the spinal cord. Orthopedics 27(10):1087–1091
Shen HX, Li L, Yang ZG, Hou TS (2009) Position of increased signal intensity in the spinal cord on MR images: does it predict the outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Chin Med J (Engl) 122(12):1418–1422
Mehalic TF, Pezzuti RT, Applebaum BI (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging and cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 26(2):217–226 discussion 226–217
Mizuno J, Nakagawa H, Inoue T, Hashizume Y (2003) Clinicopathological study of “snake-eye appearance” in compressive myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord. J Neurosurg Spine 99(2):162–168
Singh A, Crockard HA, Platts A, Stevens J (2001) Clinical and radiological correlates of severity and surgery-related outcome in cervical spondylosis. J Neurosurg 94(2 Suppl):189–198
Wada E, Ohmura M, Yonenobu K (1995) Intramedullary changes of the spinal cord in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(20):2226–2232
Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Kihara M, Horiuchi Y (2010) Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 12(1):59–65
Ahn JS, Lee JK, Kim BK (2010) Prognostic factors that affect the surgical outcome of the laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Orthop Surg 2(2):98–104
Shin J, Jin B, Kim K, Cho Y, Cho W (2010) Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir 152(10):1687–1694
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Hida T, Machino M, Ito ZY, Matsuyama Y (2008) Postoperative changes in spinal cord signal intensity in patients with cervical compression myelopathy: comparison between preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. J Neurosurg Spine 8(6):524–528
Arvin B, Kalsi-Ryan S, Karpova A, Mercier D, Furlan JC, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG (2011) Post-operative magnetic resonance imaging can predict neurological recovery following surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with blinded assessments. Neurosurgery 69(2):362–368
Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, Matsui S, Ohue S, Sakaki S (1997) Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 48(3):237
Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Wang LF, Ding WY, Xu JX, He J (2010) Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(10):E396–E399
Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T (1991) Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 4(3):286–295
Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K (1981) Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6(4):354–364
Al-Mefty O, Harkey LH, Middleton TH, Smith RR, Fox JL (1988) Myelopathic cervical spondylotic lesions demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 68(2):217–222
Ohshio I, Hatayama A, Kaneda K, Takahara M, Nagashima K (1993) Correlation between histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(9):1140–1149
Faiss J, Schroth G, Grodd W, Koenig E, Will B, Thron A (1990) Central spinal cord lesions in stenosis of the cervical canal. Neuroradiology 32(2):117–123
Ramanauskas WL, Wilner HI, Metes JJ, Lazo A, Kelly JK (1989) MR imaging of compressive myelomalacia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13(3):399–404
Choi S, Lee SH, Lee JY, Choi WG, Choi WC, Choi G, Jung B, Lee SC (2005) Factors affecting prognosis of patients who underwent corpectomy and fusion for treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: analysis of 47 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):309–314
Srinivasa Rao NV, Rajshekhar V (2009) Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy: incidence and outcome after central corpectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 10(4):374–379
Fujiwara Y, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Ochi M (2006) Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(20):E728–E732
Kameyama T, Ando T, Yanagi T, Yasui K, Sobue G (1998) Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstration of intrinsic cord pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(4):448–452
Rajshekhar V, Kumar GS (2005) Functional outcome after central corpectomy in poor-grade patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurosurgery 56(6):1279–1284
Okada Y, Ikata T, Yamada H, Sakamoto R, Katoh S (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(14):2024–2029
Koyanagi T, Hirabayashi K, Satomi K, Toyama Y, Fujimura Y (1993) Predictability of operative results of cervical compression myelopathy based on preoperative computed tomographic myelography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(14):1958–1963
Matz PG, Anderson PA, Kaiser MG, Holly LT, Groff MW, Heary RF, Mummaneni PV, Ryken TC, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ (2009) Introduction and methodology: guidelines for the surgical management of cervical degenerative disease. J Neurosurg Spine 11(2):101–103
Ozawa H, Sato T, Hyodo H, Ishii Y, Morozumi N, Koizumi Y, Matsumoto F, Kasama F, Aizawa T, Itoi E, Kokubun S (2010) Clinical significance of intramedullary Gd-DTPA enhancement in cervical myelopathy. Spinal Cord 48(5):415–422
Cho YE, Shin JJ, Kim KS, Chin DK, Kuh SU, Lee JH, Cho WH (2011) The relevance of intramedullary high signal intensity and gadolinium (Gd-DTPA) enhancement to the clinical outcome in cervical compressive myelopathy. Eur Spine J 20(12):2267–2274
Alafifi T, Kern R, Fehlings M (2007) Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neuroimaging 17(4):315–322
Zhang Y-z, Wang L-f, Shen Y, Ding WY, Xu JX, He J (2009) The effects of MRI signal intensity changes and clinical manifestations on prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Surg 1(2):101–106
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest. No funding or grants were received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vedantam, A., Rajshekhar, V. Does the type of T2-weighted hyperintensity influence surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A review. Eur Spine J 22, 96–106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2483-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2483-9