Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in the early detection of impending spinal cord injury during surgery for spinal deformity.
Method
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data in 354 consecutive spinal deformity operations from June 2003 to October 2013. Patients were sub-grouped according to demographics, diagnosis and operative features. Post-operative neurological deficit was defined as either spinal cord, nerve root or transient deficit.
Results
Combined monitoring with SSEPs and MEPs was possible in 315 cases. The overall incidence of significant alerts was 7.1 % and overall permanent neurological deficit was 1.6 %. When results were collated, the overall combined sensitivity of multimodal monitoring was 100 % with a specificity of 99.3 %.
Conclusions
Multimodal monitoring allows early detection of impending neurological deficit that is superior to a single monitoring modality. To achieve optimal use of monitoring, continuous communication between surgical, anaesthetic and neurophysiology teams are required. As a result of our experience we have incorporated in our consent procedure the discussion of monitoring and the possibility of needing to abandon the procedure, and completing in a staged fashion at a later date. We believe multimodal monitoring is the current gold standard for complex spinal deformity surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (1998) Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients: incidence and etiology at one institution. Spine 23:324–331
Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, Flynn J, Drummond DS, Bowe JA, Laufer S, Shah SA, Bowen JR, Pizzutillo PD, Jones KJ, Drummond DS (2007) Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2440–2449
Noonan KJ, Walker T, Feinberg JR, Nagel M, Didelot W, Lindseth R (2002) Factors related to false- versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 27:825–830
Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, Mehdian SM, Webb JK, Blumhardt LD (2002) Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1082–1091
Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine 35:S37–S46
Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, Bacchin MR, Bonarelli S, Cioni A, Vommaro F, Fini N, Lolli F, Parisini P (2011) The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J 20:S105–S114. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1756-z
Infants, Children and Young people with Spinal Deformity in the UK. Recommended standards of care for patients with spinal deformity. British Scoliosis Society. www.britscoliosissoc.org.uk/content/assets/1553-4.doc. Accessed 02 Jan 2015
SRS Information Statement (2009) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery. Scoliosis Research Society. https://www.srs.org/professionals/education_materials/graphics/Neuromonitoring_Information_statement_2-6-09.doc. Accessed 02 Jan 2015
ANS/BSCN Guidelines for Neurophysiological Recordings of the Spinal Cord during Corrective Spinal Deformity Surgery 2013. British Society for Clinical Neurophysiology. http://www.bscn.org.uk/content.aspx?Group=guidelines&Page=guidelines_IOM. Accessed 02 Jan 2015
Nash CL, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH (1977) Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop 126:100–105
Deletis V (1993) Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. In: Devinsky O, Beric A, Dogali M (eds) Advances in neurology: electrical and magnetic stimualtion of the brain. Raven, New York, pp 201–214
Sloan TB, Heyer EJ (2002) Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:430–443
MacDonald DB (2001) Individually optimizing posterior tibial somatosensory evoked potential P37 scalp derivations for intraoperative monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 18:364–371
A Survey of Spinal Intraoperative Monitoring (IOM) Provided by NHS Hospitals in the UK. Mullins G, Grover HJ, Rai A, Blake JC. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. http://www.bscn.org.uk/data/files/Abstracts/Abstracts%20March%202010.pdf. Accessed on 02 Jan 2015
Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Luders H, Nuwer MR, Goldie WD, Morris HH, Dinner DS, Klem G, Hahn JF, Shetter AG, Ginsburg HH, Gurd AR (1986) Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 19:22–25
Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson G, Kanim LEA, Sherman JE (1995) Somatosensoryevoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:6–11
Morris SAC, Marriott H, Walsh P, Kane N, Harding IJ, Hutchinson J, Nelson I (2014) The use of intra-operative monitoring during spinal deformity surgery. Bone Joint J 96-B:29
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhagat, S., Durst, A., Grover, H. et al. An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations. Eur Spine J 24, 1399–1407 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3766-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3766-8