Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complication rates of the new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage with those of the stand-alone cages with a titanium plate for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the surgical treatment of single- and multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD).

Methods

Between October 2009 and December 2013, 152 consecutive patients [86 males and 52 females; mean age 51.0 years (range 30–69 years)] with cervical DDD, who underwent surgery and were followed for more than 2 years, were enrolled in this study and divided into the cage group and plate group. The study compared perioperative parameters, surgery-related and implant-related complication rates, clinical outcomes, and radiologic parameters.

Results

The clinical and radiologic results in both groups were satisfactory after a minimum 2-year follow-up. No significant differences between the cage group and plate group in terms of improvement in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, visual analogue scale, Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, disc height, mean fusion time, fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration, and restoration of cervical lordosis, but the cage group was associated with a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia, shorter operation time, less blood loss, less cost of index surgery, and relatively greater simplicity than the plate group.

Conclusions

The zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage for ACDF is an effective, reliable, and safe alternate to the conventional method for the treatment of cervical DDD. However, there is no definitive evidence that Fidji cervical cage has better intermediate-term outcomes than the stand-alone cages with a titanium plate for ACDF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Jt Surg Am 40-A:607–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR (2005) Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2138–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park HW, Lee JK, Moon SJ, Seo SK, Lee JH, Kim SH (2009) The efficacy of the synthetic interbody cage and Grafton for anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E591–E595. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ab8b9a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Z, Huang J, Zhang Z, Li F, Hou T, Hou S (2014) A comparison of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000212

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bohler J, Gaudernak T (1980) Anterior plate stabilization for fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma 20:203–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts GE Jr (2002) Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 50:229–236 (discussion 236–228)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Lee KB, Song JH, Eun JP (2009) The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2886–2892. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b64f2c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujibayashi S, Shikata J, Kamiya N, Tanaka C (2000) Missing anterior cervical plate and screws: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2258–2261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowery GL, McDonough RF (1998) The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation. Patients with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:181–186 (discussion 186–187)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson JS Jr (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2310–2317. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung A, Schramm J (2010) How to reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective observational study. Neurosurgery 67:10–15. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000370203.26164.24 (discussion 15)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung A, Schramm J, Lehnerdt K, Herberhold C (2005) Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy during anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. J Neurosurg Spine 2:123–127. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.2.2.0123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2453–2458. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000031407.52778.4B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith-Hammond CA, New KC, Pietrobon R, Curtis DJ, Scharver CH, Turner DA (2004) Prospective analysis of incidence and risk factors of dysphagia in spine surgery patients: comparison of anterior cervical, posterior cervical, and lumbar procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1441–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frempong-Boadu A, Houten JK, Osborn B, Opulencia J, Kells L, Guida DD, Le Roux PD (2002) Swallowing and speech dysfunction in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, objective preoperative and postoperative assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Min Y, Kim WS, Kang SS, Choi JM, Yeom JS, Paik NJ (2013) Incidence of dysphagia and serial videofluoroscopic swallow study findings after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective study. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000060

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fengbin Y, Xinwei W, Haisong Y, Yu C, Xiaowei L, Deyu C (2013) Dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective study comparing two anterior surgical approaches. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22:1147–1151. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2620-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeyamohan SB, Kenning TJ, Petronis KA, Feustel PJ, Drazin D, DiRisio DJ (2015) Effect of steroid use in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine 23:137–143. doi:10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olsson EC, Jobson M, Lim MR (2015) Risk factors for persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Orthopedics 38:e319–e323. doi:10.3928/01477447-20150402-61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee MJ, Bazaz R, Furey CG, Yoo J (2005) Influence of anterior cervical plate design on dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:406–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kasimatis GB, Panagiotopoulos E, Gliatis J, Tyllianakis M, Zouboulis P, Lambiris E (2009) Complications of anterior surgery in cervical spine trauma: an overview. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:18–27. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.07.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Z, Jiang W, Li X, Wang H, Shi J, Chen J, Meng B, Yang H (2015) The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 24:148–154. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3628-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Riley LH 3rd, Skolasky RL, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Heller JG (2005) Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2564–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR (2005) Persistent swallowing and voice problems after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 14:677–682. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0849-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cagli S, Isik HS, Zileli M (2009) Cervical screw missing secondary to delayed esophageal fistula: case report. Turk Neurosurg 19:437–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Stulik J, Ruffing S, Drumm J, Sova L, Kucera R, Vyskocil T, Steudel WI (2009) Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:641–646. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318198ce10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD (2005) Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:558–563. doi:10.2106/JBJS.C.01555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang JY, Song HS, Lee M, Bohlman HH, Riew KD (2009) Adjacent level ossification development after anterior cervical fusion without plate fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:30–33. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318190d833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shao H, Chen J, Ru B, Yan F, Zhang J, Xu S, Huang Y (2015) Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage-plate implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 10:148. doi:10.1186/s13018-015-0290-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Li Z, Yu S, Zhao Y, Hou S, Fu Q, Li F, Hou T, Zhong H (2014) Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 21:942–948. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.09.007

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hofstetter CP, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar JA (2015) Zero-profile anchored spacer reduces rate of dysphagia compared with ACDF with anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E284–E290. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828873ed

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scholz M, Schleicher P, Pabst S, Kandziora F (2015) A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E375–E380. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang SL, Yan HW, Wang KZ (2013) Use of Fidji cervical cage in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality. BioMed Res Int 2013:810172. doi:10.1155/2013/810172

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. King JT Jr, Roberts MS (2002) Validity and reliability of the Short Form-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 97:180–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:409–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1890–1894 (discussion 1895)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D (2003) Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 12:513–516. doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC (2008) Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:288–292. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31813c0e59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Song KJ, Choi BW, Jeon TS, Lee KB, Chang H (2011) Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20:1940–1945. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1864-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thorell W, Cooper J, Hellbusch L, Leibrock L (1998) The long-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy with and without intervertebral bone graft placement. Neurosurgery 43:268–273 (discussion 273–264)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vaccaro AR, Falatyn SP, Scuderi GJ, Eismont FJ, McGuire RA, Singh K, Garfin SR (1998) Early failure of long segment anterior cervical plate fixation. J Spinal Disord 11:410–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Murphy MA, Trimble MB, Piedmonte MR, Kalfas IH (1994) Changes in the cervical foraminal area after anterior discectomy with and without a graft. Neurosurgery 34:93–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fraser JF, Hartl R (2007) Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 6:298–303. doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang Y, Ma L, Liu H, Xu M (2016) A meta-analysis of the incidence of patient-reported dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion with the zero-profile implant system. Dysphagia 31:134–145. doi:10.1007/s00455-015-9681-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Barbagallo GM, Romano D, Certo F, Milone P, Albanese V (2013) Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22(Suppl 6):S868–S878. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3005-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW, Vigna F, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC (2006) A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement: a cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:312–317. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000210117.01897.ca

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mobbs RJ, Rao P, Chandran NK (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 14:639–642. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2006.04.003

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xia XP, Chen HL, Cheng HB (2013) Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:597–608. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a2ea

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Litrico S, Lonjon N, Riouallon G, Cogniet A, Launay O, Beaurain J, Blamoutier A, Pascal-Mousselard H, French Society of Spine S (2014) Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion: a multicenter retrospective study of 288 patients with long-term follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 100:S305–S309. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chung JY, Kim SK, Jung ST, Lee KB (2014) Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 14:2290–2298. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 4:190S–194S. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hussain M, Natarajan RN, Fayyazi AH, Braaksma BR, Andersson GB, An HS (2009) Screw angulation affects bone-screw stresses and bone graft load sharing in anterior cervical corpectomy fusion with a rigid screw-plate construct: a finite element model study. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 9:1016–1023. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Miao J, Shen Y, Kuang Y, Yang L, Wang X, Chen Y, Chen D (2013) Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:E193–E197. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827a2812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cho DY, Liau WR, Lee WY, Liu JT, Chiu CL, Sheu PC (2002) Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 51:1343–1349 (discussion 1349–1350)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hacker RJ, Cauthen JC, Gilbert TJ, Griffith SL (2000) A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2646–2654 (discussion 2655)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Nakamura T (2008) Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: sequential changes in cage subsidence. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 15:1017–1022. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2007.05.011

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wu WJ, Jiang LS, Liang Y, Dai LY (2012) Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 21:1374–1382. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2131-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR (2009) A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:156–160. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ff9c4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Schmieder K, Wolzik-Grossmann M, Pechlivanis I, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Harders A (2006) Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Spine 4:447–453. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.6.447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Li Z, Guo Z, Hou S, Zhao Y, Zhong H, Yu S, Hou T (2014) Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23:1472–1479. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3208-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, Busch E, Roeca C, Nelson EL, Mason A, Burneikiene S (2011) Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery 68:1309–1316. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820b51f3 (discussion 1316)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ferch RD, Shad A, Cadoux-Hudson TA, Teddy PJ (2004) Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effects on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment. J Neurosurg 100:13–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Cailliet R, Ferrantelli JR, Haas JW, Holland B (2004) Modeling of the sagittal cervical spine as a method to discriminate hypolordosis: results of elliptical and circular modeling in 72 asymptomatic subjects, 52 acute neck pain subjects, and 70 chronic neck pain subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2485–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Kindly thanks for the support of a Special Financial Grant from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2015T81101.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhonghai Li, Li Li or Shuxun Hou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors state that there is no actual or potential of conflicts of interest in relation to this article. All authors declare that there are no any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) our work.

Funding

Kindly thanks for the support of the Special Financial Grant from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2015T81101. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional information

Z. Li, Y. Zhao and J. Tang contributed equally to the manuscript and should be considered co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Zhao, Y., Tang, J. et al. A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 26, 1129–1139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4739-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4739-2

Keywords

Navigation