Abstract
Objective
Many thoracic pedicles are too small for the safe acceptance of a transpedicular screw. However, few studies have so far reported on the methods to select a proper pedicle screw size and to confirm the morphologic changes for such a small thoracic spine pedicle. The objective of this work was to determine the potential limits of a pedicle screw diameter for transpedicular screw placement in the thoracic spine.
Methods
T2–T9 vertebrae from eleven patients that underwent posterior thoracic instrumentation with the use of fluoroscopically assisted insertion method were analyzed. The outcome measures were the pedicle widths, the gap between the outer pedicle width and the selected pedicle screw diameter, and the penetration length of the pedicle screws using computed tomography. The screws were distributed into two groups according to the pedicle width and screw diameter, and the screw perforation rate of the two groups was compared. The relationships of the gap and the distance of the screw penetration were compared and investigated in regard to the pedicle screw diameter selection.
Results
A total of 16 screws demonstrated a smaller diameter than the inner pedicle widths, while 22 screws had a larger diameter than the inner pedicle widths. One screw (6.3%) perforated the pedicle cortex in the smaller screw group, and twelve screws (54.5%) perforated the pedicle cortex in the larger screw group (P = 0.006). A linear regression analysis in the larger screw group revealed that when the gap was less than 0.5 mm, a risk of a pedicle wall violation was observed.
Conclusions
When the screws with a larger diameter than the inner pedicle width are selected, the screw perforation rate increases. Therefore, the size of the screw diameter must be at least 0.5 mm less than the outer pedicle width to ensure safe transpedicular screw placement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link T et al (2001) Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg 67:157–163
Kostuik JP, Munting E, Valdevit A (1994) Biomechanical analysis of screw load sharing in pedicle fixation of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 7:394–401
Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, Dhawan A et al (2001) In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine 26:2340–2346
Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 15:11–14
Kothe R, O’Holleran JD, Liu W et al (1996) Internal architecture of the thoracic pedicle. An anatomic study. Spine 21:264–270
McLain RF, Ferrara L, Kabins M (2002) Pedicle morphometry in the upper thoracic spine: limits to safe screw placement in older patients. Spine 27:2467–2471
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1193–1199
Bransford R, Bellabarba C, Thompson JH et al (2006) The safety of fluoroscopically-assisted thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation for spine trauma. J Trauma 60:1047–1052
Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F et al (2007) Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine 32:1655–1661
Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH et al (1999) Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81:1519–1528
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206
Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL et al (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 14:367–372
Kothe R, Panjabi MM, Liu W et al (1997) Multidirectional instability of the thoracic spine due to iatrogenic pedicle injuries during transpedicular fixation. A biomechanical investigation. Spine 22:1836–1842
Carbone JJ, Tortolani PJ, Quartararo LG (2003) Fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic and thoracolumbar injuries: technique and short-term complications. Spine 28:91–97
Fu TS, Wong CB, Tsai TT et al (2008) Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance. Int Orthop 32:517–521
Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29:333–342
Kuntz C 4th, Maher PC, Levine NB et al (2004) Prospective evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement using fluoroscopic imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:206–214
Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J et al (1996) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 21:1320–1324
Farber GI, Place HM, Mazur RA et al (1995) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine 13:1494–1499
Yazici M, Pekmezci M, Cil A et al (2006) The effect of pedicle expansion on pedicle morphology and biomechanical stability in the immature porcine spine. Spine 31:E826–E829
Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H et al (1991) An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine 16:1335–1341
White KK, Oka R, Mahar AT et al (2006) Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques. Spine 31:E355–E358
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fujimoto, T., Sei, A., Taniwaki, T. et al. Pedicle screw diameter selection for safe insertion in the thoracic spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22, 351–356 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0846-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0846-2