Skip to main content
Log in

Head and Neck Magnetic Resonance Angiography Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence of vascular lesions in the head and neck by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and investigate the factors correlated with severe stenosis.

Methods

Elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed in 413 patients at our center between May 1997 and April 2001. We used MRA to detect head and neck vascular lesions, then evaluated the occlusive lesions and determined their prevalence.

Results

Neck MRA was performed in 335 patients and head MRA was performed in 335 patients. We found ≥60% stenosis or total occlusion of the extracranial carotid and vertebral artery in 43 patients (12.8%) and ≥60% stenosis or occlusion of the intracranial carotid and basilar artery, or stenosis accompanied by poor peripheral perfusion or occlusion of the cerebral arteries in 45 patients (13.4%). Occlusive lesions of the neck were significantly correlated with mean age, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and old myocardial infarction. Occlusive lesions of the brain were significantly correlated with age, hypertension, PVD, and left main trunk disease.

Conclusions

We found an equal incidence of intracranial and extracranial vascular lesions. Thus, searching for intracranial lesions is just as important as searching for extracranial lesions before CABG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohuchi, S., Kawazoe, K., Izumoto, H. et al. Head and Neck Magnetic Resonance Angiography Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Surg Today 35, 432–435 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-004-2973-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-004-2973-4

Key words

Navigation