Skip to main content
Log in

Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: technique assessment and considerations

  • Technical Note - Vascular
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Augmented reality technology has been used for intraoperative image guidance through the overlay of virtual images, from preoperative imaging studies, onto the real-world surgical field. Although setups based on augmented reality have been used for various neurosurgical pathologies, very few cases have been reported for the surgery of arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We present our experience with AVM surgery using a system designed for image injection of virtual images into the operating microscope’s eyepiece, and discuss why augmented reality may be less appealing in this form of surgery.

Methods

N = 5 patients underwent AVM resection assisted by augmented reality. Virtual three-dimensional models of patients’ heads, skulls, AVM nidi, and feeder and drainage vessels were selectively segmented and injected into the microscope’s eyepiece for intraoperative image guidance, and their usefulness was assessed in each case.

Results

Although the setup helped in performing tailored craniotomies, in guiding dissection and in localizing drainage veins, it did not provide the surgeon with useful information concerning feeder arteries, due to the complexity of AVM angioarchitecture.

Conclusion

The difficulty in intraoperatively conveying useful information on feeder vessels may make augmented reality a less engaging tool in this form of surgery, and might explain its underrepresentation in the literature. Integrating an AVM’s hemodynamic characteristics into the augmented rendering could make it more suited to AVM surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Birkfellner W, Figl M, Huber K, Watzinger F, Wanschitz F, Hummel J, Hanel R, Greimel W, Homolka P, Ewers R, Bergmann H (2002) A head-mounted operating binocular for augmented reality visualization in medicine–design and initial evaluation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:991–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cabrilo I, Bijlenga P, Schaller K (2014) Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral aneurysms: a technical report. Neurosurgery 10(Suppl 2):252–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng W, Li F, Wang M, Song Z (2014) Easy-to-use augmented reality neuronavigation using a wireless tablet PC. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 92:17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards PJ, Hawkes DJ, Hill DL, Jewell D, Spink R, Strong A, Gleeson M (1995) Augmentation of reality using an operating microscope for otolaryngology and neurosurgical guidance. J Image Guid Surg 1:172–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards PJ, King AP, Maurer CR Jr, de Cunha DA, Hawkes DJ, Hill DL, Gaston RP, Fenlon MR, Jusczyzck A, Strong AJ, Chandler CL, Gleeson MJ (2000) Design and evaluation of a system for microscope-assisted guided interventions (MAGI). IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:1082–1093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gleason PL, Kikinis R, Altobelli D, Wells W, Alexander E 3rd, Black PM, Jolesz F (1994) Video registration virtual reality for nonlinkage stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 63:139–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Inoue D, Cho B, Mori M, Kikkawa Y, Amano T, Nakamizo A, Yoshimoto K, Mizoguchi M, Tomikawa M, Hong J, Hashizume M, Sasaki T (2013) Preliminary study on the clinical application of augmented reality neuronavigation. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74:71–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawamata T, Iseki H, Shibasaki T, Hori T (2002) Endoscopic augmented reality navigation system for endonasal transsphenoidal surgery to treat pituitary tumors: technical note. Neurosurgery 50:1393–1397

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kersten-Oertel M, Chen SS, Drouin S, Sinclair DS, Collins DL (2012) Augmented reality visualization for guidance in neurovascular surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 173:225–229

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. King AP, Edwards PJ, Maurer CR Jr, de Cunha DA, Hawkes DJ, Hill DL, Gaston RP, Fenlon MR, Strong AJ, Chandler CL, Richards A, Gleeson MJ (1999) A system for microscope-assisted guided interventions. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 72:107–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kockro RA, Tsai YT, Ng I, Hwang P, Zhu C, Agusanto K, Hong LX, Serra L (2009) Dex-ray: augmented reality neurosurgical navigation with a handheld video probe. Neurosurgery 65:795–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lovo EE, Quintana JC, Puebla MC, Torrealba G, Santos JL, Lira IH, Tagle P (2007) A novel, inexpensive method of image coregistration for applications in image-guided surgery using augmented reality. Neurosurgery 60:366–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Low D, Lee CK, Dip LL, Ng WH, Ang BT, Ng I (2010) Augmented reality neurosurgical planning and navigation for surgical excision of parasagittal, falcine and convexity meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 24:69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahvash M, Besharati Tabrizi L (2013) A novel augmented reality system of image projection for image-guided neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 155:943–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mert A, Gan LS, Knosp E, Sutherland GR, Wolfsberger S (2013) Advanced cranial navigation. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):43–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paleologos TS, Wadley JP, Kitchen ND, Thomas DG (2000) Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery. Neurosurgery 47:40–47, discussion 47–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peters TM (2006) Image-guidance for surgical procedures. Phys Med Biol 51:R505–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Radovanovic I, Abou-Hamden A, Bacigaluppi S, Tymianski M (2014) A safety, length of stay, and cost analysis of minimally invasive microsurgery for anterior circulation aneurysms. Acta Neurochir 156:493–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shuhaiber JH (2004) Augmented reality in surgery. Arch Surg 139:170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stadie AT, Reisch R, Kockro RA, Fischer G, Schwandt E, Boor S, Stoeter P (2009) Minimally invasive cerebral cavernoma surgery using keyhole approaches - solutions for technique-related limitations. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 52:9–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasargil MG (1987) Pathological Considerations: Elements of an AVM. Microneurosurgery. vol IIIA: AVM of the Brain, History, Embryology, Pathological Considerations, Hemodynamics, Daignostic Studies, Microsurgical Anatomy. Thieme New York, pp 111-138

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Cabrilo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabrilo, I., Bijlenga, P. & Schaller, K. Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: technique assessment and considerations. Acta Neurochir 156, 1769–1774 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2183-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2183-9

Keywords

Navigation