Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic approach to the upper cervical spine and clivus: an anatomical study of the upper limits of the transoral corridor

  • Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Anatomy
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent advances in endoscopic techniques have allowed minimally invasive approaches to the cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) through the oropharynx (ETA) in addition to the transnasal approach (EEA). These minimally invasive endoscopic techniques allow for increased surgical exposure using no visible incisions, with a potential less morbidity. The ability to know preoperatively the limit of the ETA is vital for the surgical planning in order to better address CVJ pathology. The aim of the present study is to determine the anatomical limits of endoscopic dissection of the skull base and upper cervical spine through the transoral corridor and the superior limit reached by adopting this approach.

Methods

Six fresh-frozen adult cadaver heads were dissected adopting ETA preserving the hard and soft palate. The most superior extent of the exposure was dissected. Post-operative CT scans were performed to confirm the superior extent.

Results

The superior most limit of dissection corresponded to the sphenoid-occipital junction, where the basilar portion of the occipital bone joins with the sphenoid bone’s body. This ranged from 12.7 to 18.9 mm above the line of the hard palate. This was achieved without having to transgress any of the palatine structures.

Conclusions

The sphenoid-occipital junction represents the rostral limit of endoscopic transoral approach to the lower skull base and CVJ area. This approach is limited superiorly by the orientation of the hard palate and mouth aperture and lower dentition due to the linear nature of the endoscope. Using the endoscope for this approach can allow for a more superior exposure than the traditional open transoral approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldana PR, Naseri I, La Corte E (2012) The naso-axial line: a new method of accurately predicting the inferior limit of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 71(Suppl 2):ons308–ons314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baird CJ, Conway JE, Sciubba DM, Prevedello DM, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Kassam AB (2009) Radiographic and anatomic basis of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: a comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Neurosurgery 65(6 Suppl):158–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balasingam V, Anderson GJ, Gross ND, Cheng CM, Noguchi A, Dogan A, McMenomey SO, Delashaw JB Jr, Anderson PE (2006) Anatomical analysis of transoral surgical approaches to the clivus. J Neurosurg 105:301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, de Lara D, Durmus K, Ozer E (2013) Combined transoral robotic surgery and endoscopic endonasal approach for the resection of extensive malignancies of the skull base. Head Neck 35(11):E351–E358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crockard HA (1985) The transoral approach to the base of the brain and upper cervical cord. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:321–325

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Crockard HA (1995) Transoral surgery: some lessons learned. Br J Neurosurg 9:283–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, Kassam AB (2009) Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope 119:239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Debernardi A, D’Aliberti G, Talamonti G, Villa F, Piparo M, Collice M (2011) The craniovertebral junction area and the role of the ligaments and membranes. Neurosurgery 68:291–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Sayed IH, Wu JC, Ames CP, Balamurali G, Mummaneni PV (2010) Combined transnasal and transoral endoscopic approaches to the craniovertebral junction. J Craniovertebral Junction Spine 1:44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Sayed IH, Wu JC, Dhillon N, Ames CP, Mummaneni P (2011) The importance of platybasia and the palatine line in patient selection for endonasal surgery of the craniocervical junction: a radiographic study of 12 patients. World Neurosurg 76:183–188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG (2002) Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S60–S66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Funaki T, Matsushima T, Peris-Celda M, Valentine RJ, Joo W, Rhoton AL Jr (2013) Focal transnasal approach to the upper, middle, and lower clivus. Neurosurgery 73(Operative Neurosurgery 2);ons155–ons191

  13. Goal A, Cacciola F (2011) The craniovertebral junction. Diagnosis, pathology, surgical techniques, 1st edn. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., Stuttgart, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg AD, Scoville WB, Davey LM (1968) Transoral decompression of atlanto-axial dislocation due to odontoid hypoplasia Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 28:266–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu W, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Sciubba DM (2010) Transoral approaches to the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 66(3 Suppl):119–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones DC, Hayter JP, Vaughan ED, Findlay GF (1998) Oropharyngeal morbidity following transoral approaches to the upper cervical spine. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27:295–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. La Corte E, Aldana PR, Ferroli P, Greenfield JP, Härtl R, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2015) The rhinopalatine line as a reliable predictor of the inferior extent of endonasal odontoidectomies. Neurosurg Focus 38(4):E16. doi:10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JY, Lega B, Bhowmick D, Newman JG, O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Grady MS, Welch WC (2010) Da Vinci Robot-assisted transoral odontoidectomy for basilar invagination. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 72:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JY, O’Malley BW, Newman JG, Weinstein GS, Lega B, Diaz J, Grady MS (2010) Transoral robotic surgery of craniocervical junction and atlantoaxial spine: a cadaveric study. J Neurosurg Spine 12:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lega BC, Kramer DR, Newman JG, Lee JY (2011) Morphometric measurements of the anterior skull base for endoscopic transoral and transnasal approaches. Skull Base 21:65–70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Menezes AH (1997) Craniovertebral junction anomalies: diagnosis and management. Semin Pediatr Neurol 4:209–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Menezes AH (2008) Craniovertebral junction database analysis: incidence, classification, presentation, and treatment algorithms. Childs Nerv Syst 24:1101–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Menezes AH (2008) Surgical approaches: postoperative care and complications “transoral-transpalatopharyngeal approach to the craniocervical junction”. Childs Nerv Syst 24:1187–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW (2005) Transoral odontoidectomy. Neurosurgery 56:1045–1050

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perrini P, Benedetto N, Guidi E, Di Lorenzo N (2009) Transoral approach and its superior extensions to the craniovertebral junction malformations: surgical strategies and results. Neurosurgery 64:ons331–ons332

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pillai P, Baig MN, Karas CS, Ammirati M (2009) Endoscopic image-guided transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomic study comparing surgical exposure and surgical freedom obtained with the endoscope and the operating microscope. Neurosurgery 64(5 Suppl 2):437–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rhoton AL Jr (2007) Rhoton’s cranial anatomy and surgical approaches. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seker A, Inoue K, Osawa S, Akakin A, Kilic T, Rhoton AL Jr (2010) Comparison of endoscopic transnasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. World Neurosurg 74(6):583–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh H, Harrop J, Schiffmacher P, Rosen M, Evans J (2010) Ventral surgical approaches to craniovertebral junction chordomas. Neurosurgery 66(3 Suppl):96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Visocchi M, Della Pepa GM, Doglietto F, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Massimi L (2011) Video-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: personal experience in childhood. Childs Nerv Syst 27:825–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Visocchi M, Doglietto F, Della Pepa GM, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Di Rocco C, Maira G, Fernandez E (2011) Endoscope-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction compressive pathologies. Eur Spine J 20:1518–1525

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Visocchi M, Pappalardo G, Pileggi M, Signorelli F, Paludetti G, La Rocca G (2016) Experimental endoscopic angular domains of transnasal and transoral routes to the craniovertebral junction: light and shade. Spine 41(8):669–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu JC, Mummaneni PV, El-Sayed IH (2011) Diseases of the odontoid and craniovertebral junction with management by endoscopic approaches. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 44:1029–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang MS, Yoon TH, Yoon do H, Kim KN, Pennant W, Ha Y (2011) Robot-assisted transoral odontoidectomy : experiment in new minimally invasive technology, a cadaveric study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 49:248–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Youssef AS, Guiot B, Black K, Sloan AE (2008) Modifications of the transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: anatomic study and clinical correlations. Neurosurgery 62(3 Suppl 1):145–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Youssef AS, Sloan AE (2010) Extended transoral approaches: surgical technique and analysis. Neurosurgery 66(3 Suppl):126–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dee Grant, RN, CNOR, for her expertise and invaluable assistance during the cadaver dissection; Saswata Roy, MD for his assistance in the surgical exposure; and to Carlos Guillermo Campos for his great help in graphics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp R. Aldana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper. This study was supported in part by the Medtronic Foundation.

Ethical standards

All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

La Corte, E., Aldana, P.R. Endoscopic approach to the upper cervical spine and clivus: an anatomical study of the upper limits of the transoral corridor. Acta Neurochir 159, 633–639 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3103-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3103-6

Keywords

Navigation