Skip to main content
Log in

Shunt age-related complications in adult patients with suspected shunt dysfunction. A recommended diagnostic workup

  • Original Article - Abstract
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients admitted for suspicion of shunt dysfunction (SD) often show unspecific symptoms and require time-consuming, expensive and even invasive diagnostics involving significant radiation exposure. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyse the current diagnostic procedures and to propose a process optimisation.

Method

As all patients admitted for suspicion of SD receive imaging studies, we searched for adult patients receiving neuroimaging in the period from January 2010 to July 2013, analysing referring diagnosis, clinical signs, products, diagnostic process and final diagnosis. Recursive partitioning was used to define time intervals for differentiating types of SD.

Results

A total of 148 patients, aged 18–89 (mean, 54) years, were studied. Forty-two percent were referred by a hospital or rehabilitation centre, 30% by general practitioners and 24% were self-referrals. The admission diagnosis was in the majority “shunt dysfunction” only. Further differentiations were rarely made. An SD was confirmed in 46% of the patients. In 17%, the symptoms were based on another cause and in 37% they could not be clearly attributed to any specific disorder. Abdominal dislocations (2%) and shunt infections (5%) were found within the first 6 months. Over- (3%) and under-drainage (14%) were the most frequent complications during the first 4 years. Disconnections (13%) occurred generally 4 years or more after implantation. Only shunt obstruction (9%) showed no temporal pattern.

Conclusions

Symptoms of SD remain mostly unspecific. This study showed that the type of SD depends on the time interval from implantation. We propose a workup strategy for patients with SD based on the temporal profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes NP, Jones SJ, Hayward RD, Harkness WJ, Thompson D (2002) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt block: what are the best predictive clinical indicators? Arch Dis Child 87(3):198–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chou SY, Digre KB (1999) Neuro-ophthalmic complications of raised intracranial pressure, hydrocephalus, and shunt malfunction. Neurosurg Clin N Am 10(4):587–608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen JS, Jamal N, Dawes C, Chamberlain JM, Atabaki SM (2014) Cranial computed tomography utilization for suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction in a pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Med 46(4):449–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutierrez-Murgas Y, Snowden JN (2014) Ventricular shunt infections: Immunopathogenesis and clinical management. J Neuroimmunol 276(1–2):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim TY, Stewart G, Voth M, Moynihan JA, Brown L (2006) Signs and symptoms of cerebrospinal fluid shunt malfunction in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 22(1):28–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehnert BE, Rahbar H, Relyea-Chew A, Lewis DH, Richardson ML, Fink JR (2011) Detection of ventricular shunt malfunction in the ED: relative utility of radiography, CT, and nuclear imaging. Emerg Radiol 18(4):299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Naradzay JF, Browne BJ, Rolnick MA, Doherty RJ (1999) Cerebral ventricular shunts. J Emerg Med 17(2):311–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy GK, Bollam P, Shi R, Guthikonda B, Nanda A (2011) Management of adult hydrocephalus with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: long-term single-institution experience. Neurosurgery 69(4):774–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sribnick E, Sarda S, Moore M, Capasse M, Tubbs RS, Wrubel D, Chern JJ (2015) Clinical outcome of children with suspected shunt malfunction evaluated in the emergency department. Neurosurgery 76(6):695–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Y, Green NL, Wrensch MR, Zhao S, Gupta N (2007) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in California: 1990 to 2000. Neurosurgery 61(3):557–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lennart H. Stieglitz.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

José M. Spirig and Melanie N. Frank contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spirig, J.M., Frank, M.N., Regli, L. et al. Shunt age-related complications in adult patients with suspected shunt dysfunction. A recommended diagnostic workup. Acta Neurochir 159, 1421–1428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3237-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3237-6

Keywords

Navigation