Abstract
The method most widely used nowadays to measure environmental tritium levels in water is electrolytic enrichment followed by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Although these techniques have been in use for many years, there is a gap in systematic analysis of the sources of uncertainty associated with this particular application. The paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the individual uncertainty components of the entire analytical process, starting from sample preparation to radioactivity measurement. Examples of the complete uncertainty budget for typical tritium levels in the analysed water samples are included. The relative importance of individual uncertainty components is given and possible ways of improving the overall quality of analyses are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The use of product names is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
References
Lucas LL, Unterweger MP (2000) J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 105:541–549
Unterweger MP, Coursey BM, Schima FJ, Mann WB (1980) Int J Appl Radiat Isot 31:611
Unterweger MP, Lucas LL (2000) Int J Appl Radiat Isot 52:527–531
Rozanski K, Gonfiantini R, Araguas-Araguas L (1991) J Phys G: Nucl Part Phys 17:523–536
Taylor CB (1981) Present status and trends in electrolytic enrichment of low-level tritium in water. In: Methods of Low-level Counting and Spectrometry, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p303–325
Hut G (1986) Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B17:490–492
Taylor CB (1977) Tritium enrichment of environmental waters by electrolysis: development of cathodes exhibiting high isotopic separation and precise measurement of tritium enrichment factors. In: Povinec P (ed.) Low Radioactivities: Measurements and Applications. Bratislava, p131–140
Taylor CB (1976) IAEA Isotope Hydrology Laboratory Technical Procedure Note No.19, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p1–30
Florkowski T (1981) Low-level tritium assay in water samples by electrolytic enrichment and liquid scintillation counting in the IAEA laboratory In: Methods of Low-level Counting and Spectrometry. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p335–353
Mohr P, Taylor BN (2000) Rev Mod Phys 72:351–495
Rozanski K, Gröning M (2003) Quantifying uncertainties of tritium assay in water samples using electrolytic enrichment and liquid scintillation spectrometry. In: IAEA TECDOC Quantifying Uncertainty in the Nuclear Analytical Measurements (in preparation). Text available on the Homepage of the IAEA Isotope Hydrology Laboratory http://www.iaea.org/programmes/rial/pci/isotopehydrology/
ISO (1995) Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 1st edn. 110 pp
Weiss W, Roether W, Bader G (1976) Int J Appl Rad Isot 27:217–225
Florkowski T, Nawalany M (1974) Nukleonika 19:331–336
EURACHEM (2000) EURACHEM/CITAC Guide: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 2nd edn. 120 pp
Mandel J (1984) The statistical analysis of experimental data. Dover,. New York
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank our colleague Randolf Auer from the IAEA Isotope Hydrology Laboratory for fruitful discussions and improvements related to the part on sample weighing and electrolysis, as well as Claude Taylor and Walter Krause for suggestions for improving the manuscript. The work of one co-author (K. Rozanski) was partially supported by the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gröning, M., Rozanski, K. Uncertainty assessment of environmental tritium measurements in water. Accred Qual Assur 8, 359–366 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0631-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0631-y