Skip to main content
Log in

Smart objects to support the discrimination training of children with autism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teachers spend considerable amount of time keeping students with autism “on task” giving away prompts and rewards and maintaining a detailed record of students’ progress during the object discrimination training. We hypothesize that tangible computing, in particular smart objects, could help teachers cope with the problems faced during the object discrimination training of students with autism. In this paper, we describe design principles for smart objects to support the object discrimination training and present several example prototypes. First, we present the design and implementation of “Things that think” (T3), a smart device that converts traditional objects into smart objects that promote interactivity with a playful and engaging interaction, and are capable of the automatic recording of students’ progress. Then, we present four T3 smart objects assembled in a board. The results of a 7-week deployment study of the use of such smart objects in three classrooms of students with autism (n = 25, 7 teachers and 18 students with autism) demonstrate T3 smart objects reduce the workload of teachers, ease the record-keeping and increase its reliability, and reduce students’ behavioral problems while improving their cognitive efficacy. We close discussing directions for future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CDC's Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network.

  2. http://www.livescribe.com.

  3. http://www.pasitos.org.

  4. Although we were interested in understanding the impact of the T3Board on students and teachers, teachers were mainly interviewed as proxies [24]. Tang and McCorkle [24] to gather the information from non-verbal students with autism.

  5. The student file is a record storing clinical and behavioral information about a particular child including his/her diagnosis, goals, and interests.

  6. Participants’ quotes were translated from Spanish to English, and some were adjusted to fit English grammar conventions.

  7. http://www.bu.mp.com.

References

  1. Antle AN (2007) The CTI framework: informing the design of tangible systems for children. In: Proceedings of the TEI 2007. ACM Press, pp 195–202

  2. Binger C (2008) Classroom-based language goals and intervention for children who use AAC: back to basics. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 17(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd L, McReynolds C, Chanin K (2013) The social compass curriculum: a story-based intervention package for students with autism spectrum disorders, 1st edn. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore

  4. Brave S, Dahley A (1998) inTouch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication. In: Proceedings of the CHI 1997. ACM Press, pp 363–364

  5. Campbell JM (2003) Efficacy of behavioral interventions for reducing problem behavior in persons with autism: a quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Res Dev Disabil 24(2):120–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen MJ, Sloan DL (2007) Visual supports for people with autism: a guide for parents and professionals. Woodbine House, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cramer M et al (2011) Classroom-based assistive technology: collective use of interactive visual schedules by students with autism. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2011. ACM Press, pp 1–10

  8. Dautenhahn K, Werry I (2004) Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges. Pragmat Cogn 12(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Escobedo L et al (2012) MOSOCO: a mobile assistive tool to support children with autism practicing social skills in real-life situations. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2012. ACM Press, pp 2589–2598

  10. Hayes GR et al (2008) CareLog: a selective archiving tool for behavior management in schools. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2008. ACM Press, pp 685–694

  11. Hayes GR et al (2010) Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Pers Ubiquit Comput 4(7):663–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes GR et al (2004) Designing capture applications to support the education of children with autism. In: Proceedings of the Ubi-Comp 2004. ACM Press, pp 161–178

  13. Hinske SM, Langheinrich M, Lampe M (2008) Towards guidelines for designing augmented toy environments In: Proceedings of the DIS 2008. ACM Press, pp 78-87

  14. Hirano S et al (2010) vSked: evaluation of a system to support classroom activities for children with autism. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2010. ACM Press, pp 1633–1642

  15. Keywon C et al (2010) OnObject: gestural play with tagged everyday objects. In: Proceedings of the UIST 2010. ACM Press, pp 379–380

  16. Kientz JA et al (2005) Abaris: Evaluating Automated Capture Applied to Structured Autism Interventions. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp 2005. ACM Press, pp 323–339

  17. López de Ipiña D et al (2005) A reflective middleware for controlling smart objects from mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the sOc-EUSAI 2005. ACM Press, pp 213–218

  18. Piper AM, Weibel N, Hollan JD (2012) TAP & PLAY: an end-user toolkit for authoring interactive pen and paper language activities. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2012. ACM Press, pp 149–158

  19. Pontual TF, Price S (2010) Informing design for tangible interaction: a case for children with learning difficulties. In: Proceedings of the IDC10. ACM Press, pp 190–193

  20. Quill K (1997) Instructional considerations for young children with autism: the rationale for visually cued instruction. J Autism Dev Disord 27(6):697–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quintana E et al (2012) Object and gesture recognition to assist children with autism during the discrimination training. In: Proceedings of the CIARP 2012. Springer, pp 877–884

  22. Raffle HS, Parkes AJ, Ishii H (2004) Topobo: a constructive assembly system with kinetic memory. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2004. ACM Press, pp 647–654

  23. Sitdhisanguan K et al (2012) Using tangible user interfaces in computer-based training systems for low- functioning autistic children. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16(2):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang S, McCorkle R (2002) Use of family proxies in quality of life research for cancer patients at the end of life: a literature review. Cancer Invest 20(7–8):1086–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tentori M, Favela J, Rodriguez M (2006) Privacy-aware autonomous agents for pervasive healthcare. IEEE Intell Syst 21(6):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tentori M, Hayes GR (2010) Designing for Interaction Immediacy to Enhance Social Skills of Children with Autism. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp 2010. ACM Press, pp 51–60

  27. Williams G, Pérez-González LA, Muller A (2005) Using a combined blocking procedure to teach color discrimination to a child with autism. J Appl Behav Anal 38(4):555–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zuckerman O, Arida S, Resnick M (2005) Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2005. ACM Press, pp 859–868

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank to Pasitos A.C. for their support. This work was funded through Lizbeth Escobedo’s and Catalina Ibarra’s CONACYT fellowships and through the UCMexus Grant #634-237 and CONACYT Grant #10256.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lizbeth Escobedo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Escobedo, L., Ibarra, C., Hernandez, J. et al. Smart objects to support the discrimination training of children with autism. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 1485–1497 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0750-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0750-3

Keywords

Navigation