Abstract
Objectives
Interdental cleaning is an essential component of home plaque control to prevent periodontitis and caries. There is limited data on the efficacy of commonly used metal-core interdental brushes in comparison to metal-free interdental brushes. The aim of this study was to compare a new rubber interdental bristle (Fuchs®) with a standard metal-core interdental brush (TePe®) for their impact upon gingival bleeding, plaque removal, and patient experience.
Materials and methods
A single-blind, prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial with a crossover design was used to measure plaque index (Turesky-Modified Quigley & Hein Index), bleeding index (Eastman Interdental Bleeding Index by Caton & Polson), and patient satisfaction by means of questionnaires in 39 patients. Each patient was randomly assigned with regard to the sequence of interdental product used and recalled.
Results
Both groups showed statistically significant decreases of plaque after a single usage, respectively. Bleeding was statistically significantly reduced after 4 weeks, with no statistically significant differences concerning between the two tested interdental brushes. Rubber interdental bristles reached significantly higher scores with regard to patient acceptance in overall assessment and in sub-items for less pain during usage, comfort of brushing, and willingness to buy the product.
Conclusion
Rubber interdental bristles were similarly effective compared to the interdental brushes. In addition, rubber interdental bristles were significantly more comfortable for participants than metal-core brushes.
Clinical relevance
Rubber interdental bristles can be used as an alternative interdental cleaning product which may be more accepted by patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelsson P, Nyström B, Lindhe J (2004) The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 31:749–757
Berchier CE, Slot DE, Haps S, Van der Weijden GA (2008) The efficacy of dental floss in addition to a toothbrush on plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 6:265–279
Blieden TM, Caton JG, Proskin HM, Stein SH, Wagener CJ (1992) Examiner reliability for an invasive gingival bleeding index. J Clin Periodontol 19:262–267
Caton J, Polson AM (1985) The interdental bleeding index: a simplified procedure for monitoring gingival health. Compend Contin Educ Dent 6:90–92
Caton J, Polson A, Bouwsma O, Blieden T, Frantz B, Espeland M (1988) Associations between bleeding and visual signs of interdental gingival inflammation. J Periodontol 59:722–727
Charon J, Sandele P, Joachim F (1990) Iatrogenic interdental brushing. Apropos of a case. J Parodontol 9:51–55
Chongcharoen N, Lulic M, Lang NP (2011) Effectiveness of different interdental brushes on cleaning the interproximal surfaces of teeth and implants: a randomized controlled, double-blind cross-over study. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:635–640
Christou V, Timmerman MF, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden FA (1998) Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss. J Periodontol 69:759–764
Dörfer C, Oliveira S, Staehle H (1994) Characterisation of interdental brushes (in German). Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 49:792–795
Kiger RD, Nylund K, Feller RP (1991) A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes. J Clin Periodontol 18:681–684
Lang NP, Cullinan MP, Holborow DW, Heitz-Mayfield LJA (2010) Examiner training standardization and calibration in periodontal studies. In: Giannobile WV, Burt B, Genco RJ (eds) Clinical research in oral health, chapter 9. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 159–175
Lindfors E, Helkimo M, Magnusson T (2011) Patients’ adherence to hard acrylic interocclusal appliance treatment in general dental practice in Sweden. Swed Dent J 35:133–142
McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P (2007) The Hawthorne effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:30
McCracken GI, Heasman L, Stacey F, Kelly PJ, Heasman PA (2000) Testing the efficacy of plaque removal of a prototype brush head for a powered toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol 27:542–548
McCracken GI, Steen N, Preshaw P, Heasman L, Stacey F, Heasman PA (2005) The crossover design to evaluate the efficacy of plaque removal in tooth-brushing studies. J Clin Periodontol 32:1157–1162
Nagel B, Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, Pfingsten M (2002) Development and evaluation of the multidimensional German pain questionnaire. Schmerz 16:263–270
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Oringer RJ (2002) Modulation of the host response in periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 73:460–470
Piantadosi S (1997) Clinical trials: A methodologic perspective. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Renz A, Ide M, Newton T, Robinson PG, Smith D (2007) Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal diseases. Cochrane Db Syst Rev Issue 2. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005097.pub2/abstract. Accessed 04 June 2012
Schüz B, Sniehotta FF, Wiedeman A, Seemann R (2006) Adherence to a daily flossing regimen in university students: effects of planning when, where, how and what to do in the face of barriers. J Clin Periodontol 33:612–619
Slot DE, Dörfer CE, Van der Weijden GA (2008) The efficacy of interdental brushes on plaque and parameters of periodontal inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 6:253–264
Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WJ, Payne AGT, Thomson WM, Wennström JL (2002) Relative effectiveness of powered and manual toothbrushes in elderly patients with implant‐supported mandibular overdentures. J Clin Periodontol 29:275–280
Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I (1970) Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol 41:41–43
Van Der Weijden F, Slot DE (2011) Oral hygiene in the prevention of periodontal diseases: the evidence. Periodontol 55:104–123
Wolff D, Joerss D, Dörfer CE (2006) In vitro-cleaning efficacy of interdental brushes with different stiffness and different diameter. Oral Health Prevent Dent 4:279–285
Yost KG, Mallatt ME, Liebman J (2006) Interproximal gingivitis and plaque reduction by four interdental products. J Clin Dent 17:79–83
Conflict of interest and source of funding statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Thaer Abouassi and Johan P Woelber contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abouassi, T., Woelber, J.P., Holst, K. et al. Clinical efficacy and patients' acceptance of a rubber interdental bristle. A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Invest 18, 1873–1880 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1164-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1164-3