Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geographical information systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) integration for sustainable landfill site selection considering dynamic data source

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landfill site selection is complex task in which many different factors need to be considered. The aim of this study is to identify suitable landfill sites for a 35-year period using a Geographical Information Systems (GIS) with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). If an analysis is carried out to resolve a problem as it exists today, then the same problem will recur in the years to come due to changes in the input parameters. Future prospections should always be considered when using GIS with MCDA for the creation of mid- and/or long-term solutions. To assess the proposed approach, the city of Antalya was chosen for study, being the city with the highest population growth in Turkey. Twelve available parameters (i.e., digital elevation model, aspect, slope, temperature, precipitation, earthquake zones, distance to road, visibility from roads, distance to population density, geology, landslide density, and distance to fault lines), prepared through a series of GIS analyses, were used to carry out a landfill site selection. The weights of the parameters were obtained from a constructed Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) matrix, and the consistency index and the consistency ratio were recorded as 0.091 and 0.062, respectively. For the study, protection zones were omitted. The analysis revealed a number of potential landfill sites. Furthermore, the volume of solid waste for the next 35-year period was calculated using dynamic population data, and possible candidate sites for landfill were generated. The proposed approach can serve as a guide for future works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksoy E, San BT (2016) Using Mcda and GIS for landfill site selection: central districts of Antalya Province. ISPRS - international archives of the photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLI(B2):151–157. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B2-151-2016

  • Cao LW, Cheng YH, Zhang J, Zhou XZ, Lian CX (2006) Application of Grey situation decision-making theory in site selection of a waste sanitary landfill. J China Univ Min Technol 16:393–398. doi:10.1016/s1006-1266(07)60033-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang NB, Parvathinathan G, Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87:139–153. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vallejo LG, Ferrer M (2011) Geological Engineering, 1st ed. CRC Pres Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN: 978–0415413527, 700p

  • Demesouka OE, Vavatsikos AP, Anagnostopoulos KP (2013) Suitability analysis for siting MSW landfills and its multicriteria spatial decision support system: method, implementation and case study. Waste Manag 33:1190–1206. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donevska KR, Gorsevski MJ, Pesevski I (2011) Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci 67:121–131. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1485-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman TY, Olgun S, Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Hamzacebi S, Elmaci H et al (2009) 1:500 000 scaled landslide inventory maps of Turkey, Konya quarter. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy H, Bulut F, Berkün M (2013) Landfill site requirements on the rock environment: a case study. Eng Geol 154:20–35. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskandari M, Homaee M, Mahmodi S (2012) An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economical and socio-cultural area. Waste Manag 32:1528–1538. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gbanie SP, Tengbe PB, Momoh JS, Medo J, Kabba VTS (2013) Modelling landfill location using geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): case study Bo, southern Sierra Leone. Appl Geogr 36:3–12. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski PV, Donevska KR, Mitrovski CD, Frizado JP (2012) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average. Waste Manag 32:287–296. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülkan P, Kocyigit A, Yücemen MS, Doyuran V, Basöz N (1993) Turkish earthquake zone maps prepared by using the latest data (in Turkish). General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Ankara

  • Gumussay MU, Koseoglu G, Bakirman T (2016) An assessment of site suitability for marina construction in Istanbul, Turkey, using GIS and AHP multicriteria decision analysis. Environ Monit Assess 188(1):676–690. doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5677-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management, Urban Development Series Knowledge Papers, The World Bank, No:15, 116p

  • Hudson JA, Harrison LP (2000) Engineering rock mechanics. An introduction to the principles, 458p., ISBN: 978-0080438641, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • ILBANK (2013) Technical specifications for potable water facilities investigation, feasibility and preperation of thier projects. Ilbank; Iller Bankasi Anonim Sirketi, Turkey, p 78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayabali K (2014) Engineering Geology, Ankara University Press. Ankara University Press, Ankara, 399 (8), 664p, ISBN: 978–605–136-133-8

  • Koc-San D, San BT, Bakis V, Helvaci M, Eker Z (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis integrated with GIS and remote sensing for astronomical observatory site selection in Antalya province, Turkey. Adv Space Res 52:39–51. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2013.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor K, Media D (2016) How Long Is the Average Landfill Open? http://classroom.synonym.com/long-average-landfill-open-7103.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2016

  • MEU (1924) Village Law of Turkey. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Act no. 442, array: 3, 5: 336p

  • Ministry of Culture and Tourism (2016) Antalya Provincial Culture And Tourism Directorate. http://www.antalyakulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,175865/yabanci-ziyaretci-sayilari-ve-milliyet-dagilimi-2012-20-.html. Accessed 11 Jun 2016

  • Ministry of Education (2009) Environmental Protection and Salid Waste Collection. Ankara, p 95 (in Turkish). http://hbogm.meb.gov.tr/modulerprogramlar/kursprogramlari/cevrekoruma/moduller/kati_atik_toplama.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2016

  • Motlagh ZK, Sayadi MH (2015) Siting MSW landfills using MCE methodology in GIS environment (case study: Birjand plain, Iran). Waste Manag 46:322–337. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2016) ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V002. Earth Data Search (EDS) 1.23.5. https://urs.earthdata.nasa.gov/login. Accessed 12 Aug 2016

  • Ozmen B, Nurlu M, Güler H (1995) Investigation of earthquake zones using geographical information systems. The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, 287p, ISBN 0-07-054371-2. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. Revista de la real academia de Ciencias exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Serie A Matemáticas 102:251–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Şener B, Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2006) Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environmental Geology 49(3): 376-388. doi:10.1007/s00254-005-0075-2

  • Sadek S, El-Fadel M, Freiha F (2006) Compliance factors within a GIS-based framework for landfill siting. Int J Environ Stud 63:71–86. doi:10.1080/00207230600562213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şenel M (1997) 1:100 000 scaled geological maps of Turkey, no:7, Antalya - L10 map, general Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (in Turkish). General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Sener S, Sener E, Nas B, Karaguzel R (2010) Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Manag 30:2037–2046. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui MZ, Everett JW, Vieux BE (1996) Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration. J Environ Eng 122:515–523. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:6(515)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumathi VR, Natesan U, Sarkar C (2008) GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill. Waste Manag 28:2146–2160. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSMS (2016) Turkish State Meteorological Service. http://mgm.gov.tr/. Accessed 12 Feb 2016

  • TUIK (2014) Population of Year 2014. Turkish Statistical Institude (in Turkish). http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1047. Accessed 12 Feb 2016

  • Union of Turkish Municipalities (2014) Sanitary Landfill Design, Site Selection and unsanitary disposal reclamation planning. http://www.tbb.gov.tr/download.php?dosya=storage/catalogs/0864274001399277406.pdf&dosyaAdi=duzenli-depolama-sahalarinin-tasarimiyer-secimi-ve-vahsi-depolama-alanlarinin-islahi. Accessed 07 Oct 2016

  • Uyan M (2014) MSW landfill site selection by combining AHP with GIS for Konya, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 71:1629–1639. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2567-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes D (1978) Landslides types and processes, landslides and engineering practice. In: Eckel E (Ed), 29. National Research Council. Highway Research Board Spec Report, USA, 20–47

  • Wang G, Qin L, Li G, Chen L (2009) Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China. J Environ Manag 90:2414–2421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Gallant J (2000) Terrain analysis principles and applications. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesilnacar MI, Suzen ML, Sener Kaya B, Doyuran V (2012) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection for the city of Sanlıurfa-Turkey: an example using MCDA integrated with GIS. Int J Digital Earth 5:147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong RN (2001) Environmental engineering: contaminated soils, pollutant fate, and mitigation. CRC Press Florida, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamorano M, Molero E, Hurtado A, Grindlay A, Ramos A (2008) Evaluation of a municipal landfill site in southern Spain with GIS-aided methodology. J Hazard Mater 160:473–481. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bekir Taner San.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aksoy, E., San, B.T. Geographical information systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) integration for sustainable landfill site selection considering dynamic data source. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 779–791 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1135-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1135-z

Keywords

Navigation