Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When should “chronic migraine” patients be considered “refractory” to pharmacological prophylaxis?

  • Drug-Resistant Primary Headaches
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with chronic headache forms evolving from a previous episodic migraine (‘chronic migraine’) are often difficult to treat. In this paper we focus attention on aspects we believe important for producing a definition of “refractory” in relation to this headache form. We propose a “chronic migraine” patient should be considered “refractory” to pharmacological prophylaxis when adequate trials of preventive therapies at adequate doses have failed to reduce headache frequency and improve headache-related disability and, in patients with medication overuse, reduce the consumption of symptomatic drugs. However before a definition of “refractory” chronic migraine can become established, generally accepted diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines for this condition need to be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goadsby PJ, Schoenen J, Ferrari M et al (2006) Towards a definition of intractable headache for use in clinical practice and trials. Cephalalgia 26:1168–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Sliwinski M (1996) Classification of daily and near-daily headaches. Neurology 47:871–875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd Edn. Cephalalgia 24[Suppl 1]:9–160

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bigal ME, Tepper SJ, Sheftell FD et al (2006) Field testing alternative criteria for chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 26:477–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2006) New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 26:742–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathew NT, Kurman R, Perez F (1990) Drug induced refractory headache-clinical features and management. Headache 30:634–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB (2001) Chronic daily headache, including transformed migraine, chronic tension-type headache, and medication overuse. In: Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ (eds) Wolff’s headache and other head pain, 7th Edn. Oxford University Press

  8. Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Sheftell FD et al (2004) Transformed migraine and medication overuse in a tertiary headache centre-clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Cephalalgia 24:483–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scher AI, Midgette LA, Lipton RB (2008) Risk factors for headache chronification. Headache 48:16–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diener HC, Limmroth V (2004) Medication overuse headache: a worldwide problem. Lancet Neurol 3:475–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freitag FG, Lake A 3rd, Lipton R et al (2004) US Headache Guidelines Consortium, Section on Inpatient Treatment Chairpersons. Inpatient treatment of headache: an evidence-based assessment. Headache 44:342–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katsarava Z, Muessig M, Dzagnidze A et al (2005) Medication overuse headache: rates and predictors for relapse in a 4-year prospective study. Cephalalgia 25:12–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathew NT (2006) The prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache. Headache 46:1552–1564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grazzi L, Andrasik F (2006) Medication-overuse headache: description treatment and relapse prevention. Curr Pain Headache Rep 10:71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonuccelli U, Nuti A, Lucetti C et al (1996) Amitriptyline and dexamethasone combined treatment in drug-induced headache. Cephalalgia 16:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Drucker P, Tepper S (1998) Daily sumatriptan for detoxification from rebound. Headache 38:687–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrasik F, Grazzi L, Usai S et al (2007) Disability in chronic migraine with medication overuse: treatment effects at 3 years. Headache 47:1277–1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeegerg P, Olesen J, Jensen R (2006) Probable medication-overuse headache: the effect of a 2-month drug-free period. Neurology 66:1894–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krymchantowski AV, Silva MT, Barbosa JS, Alves LA (2002) Amitriptyline versus amitriptyline combined with fluoxetine in the preventative treatment of transformed migraine: a double-blind study. Headache 42:510–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saper JR, Lake AE 3rd, Cantrell DT et al (2002) Chronic daily headache prophylaxis with tizanidine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter outcome study. Headache 42:470–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saper JR, Silberstein SD, Lake AE 3rd, Winters ME (1994) Double-blind trial of fluoxetine: chronic daily headache and migraine. Headache 34:497–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Spira PJ, Beran RG; Australian Gabapentin Chronic Daily Headache Group (2003) Gabapentin in the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 61:1753–1759

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Silvestrini M, Bartolini M, Coccia M et al (2003) Topiramate in the treatment of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 23:820–824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dodick DW et al; Topiramate Chronic Migraine Study Group (2007) Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache 47:170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Diener HC, Bussone G, Van Oene JC et al; TOPMAT-MIG-201(TOP-CHROME) Study Group (2007) Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 27:814–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Whyte J et al (1999) An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology 53:988–994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB et al (2003) A six-item shortform survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res 12:963–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cole J, Lin P, Rupnow MF (2007) Validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ v. 2.1) for patients undergoing prophylactic migraine treatment. Qual Life Res 16:1231–1237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Saper J et al (2007) The impact of topiramate on health-related quality of life indicators in chronic migraine. Headache 47:1398–1408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Silberstein SD, for the US Headache Consortium (2000) Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 55:754–762

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, Linde M, May A, Sándor PS (2006) EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine-report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 13:560–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Krymchantowski AV, Bigal ME (2006) Polytherapy in the preventive and acute treatment of migraine: fundamentals for changing the approach. Expert Rev Neurother 6:283–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bordini CA, Arruda MA, Cicciarelli MC, Speciali JG (1997) Propranolol vs flunarizine vs flunarizine plus propranolol in migraine without aura prophylaxis. A double-blind trial. Arq Neuropsiaqr 55:536–541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pascual J, Leira R, Láinez JM (2003) Combined therapy for migraine prevention? Clinical experience with a beta-blocker plus sodium valproate in 52 resistant migraine patients. Cephalalgia 23:961–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Krymchantowski AV, Hampshire F (2004) Polytherapy in migraine prevention. Clinical experience with the combination of a tricyclic antidepressant plus a calcium channel blocker. Headache 44:499–500

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pascual J, Rivas MT, Leira R (2007) Testing the combination betablocker plus topiramate in refractory migraine. Acta Neurol Scand 115:81–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Scher AI, Bigal ME, Lipton RB (2005) Comorbidity of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol 18:305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Scher AI, Stewart WF, Lipton RB (2006) The comorbidity of headache with other pain syndromes. Headache 46:1416–1423

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Silberstein SD, Dodick D, Freitag F et al (2007) Pharmacological approaches to managing migraine and associated comorbidities — clinical considerations for monotherapy versus polytherapy. Headache 47:585–599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico D’Amico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D’Amico, D., Leone, M., Grazzi, L. et al. When should “chronic migraine” patients be considered “refractory” to pharmacological prophylaxis?. Neurol Sci 29 (Suppl 1), 55–58 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0888-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0888-3

Keywords

Navigation