Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser with a chemical vapour deposition bur and conventional techniques for cavity preparation: a microleakage study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser using chemical vapour deposition (CVD) bur cavity preparation with conventional preparation methods including a diamond bur and a carbide bur on the microleakage with two different adhesive systems. A total of 40 extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to four experimental groups according to the cavity preparation technique: group I diamond bur (Diatech); group II carbide bur (Diatech); group III Er,Cr:YSGG laser (Biolase Millennium II); and group IV CVD bur (CVDentUS). Using the different preparation techniques, Class V standardized preparations were performed on the buccal and lingual surfaces with gingival margins on the dentin and occlusal margins on the enamel. Each preparation group was randomly assigned to two subgroups (five teeth, ten preparations) according to the type of adhesive: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond), and a single-step self-etch adhesive (AdheSE One). All preparations were restored with a nanohybrid composite resin in a single increment. Following thermocycling (×500; 5–55°C), the teeth were immersed in basic fuchsin and sectioned in the orovestibular direction. Dye penetration was evaluated under a light microscope by two blinded examiners. Data were statistically analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the preparation techniques with either of the two adhesive systems (p>0.05). Comparing the enamel and dentin leakage scores within each group, no statistically significant differences were found (p>0.05). The Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation did not differ from preparation with CVD, diamond or carbide bur in terms of microleakage with the different adhesive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berggren U, Meynert G (1984) Dental fear and avoidance: causes, symptoms, and consequences. J Am Dent Assoc 109(2):247–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF (2000) In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 34(2):144–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Celiberti P, Francescut P, Lussi A (2006) Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth. Caries Res 40(2):117–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLean ME (2003) Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 134(4):87–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Ermis RB, Poitevin A, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Carvalho RC, Van Meerbeek B (2008) Influence of dentin cavity surface finishing on micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives. Dent Mater 24(4):492–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burnett LH Jr, Conceiçaõ EN, Pelinos JE, Eduardo CD (2001) Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19(4):199–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, Raab WH (1998) Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 26(8):649–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stabholz A, Zeltser R, Sela M, Peretz B, Moshonov J, Ziskind D, Stabholz A (2003) The use of lasers in dentistry: principles of operation and clinical applications. Compend Cont Edu Dent 24(12):935–948

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dederich DN, Bushick RD (2004) Lasers in dentistry: separating science from hype. J Am Dent Assoc 135(2):204–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krmek SJ, Miletic I, Simeon P, Mehicić GP, Anić I, Radisić B (2009) The temperature changes in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation with the Er:YAG laser using a very short pulse. Photomed Laser Surg 27(2):351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Freitas PM, Soares-Geraldo D, Biella-Silva AC, Silva AV, da Silveira BL, Eduardo Cde P (2008) Intrapulpal temperature variation during Er,Cr:YSGG enamel irradiation on caries prevention. J Appl Oral Sci 16(2):95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Predebon JC, Flório FM, Basting RT (2006) Use of CVDentUS diamond tips for ultrasound in cavity preparation. J Contemp Dent Prac 7(3):50–58

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carvalho CA, Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Trava-Airoldi VJ, Navarro MF (2007) The use of CVD diamond burs for ultraconservative cavity preparations: a report of two cases. J Esthet Rest Dent 19(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, de Munck J, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdiao J, Lambrechts P, Peumans M (2006) Bonding to enamel and dentin. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS (eds) Fundamentals of operative dentistry, 3rd edn. Quintessence, Chicago, p 188

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perdigao J (2007) New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin N Am 51:333–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW (2006) In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part 1 – microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 8(6):367–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Spreafico D, Gagliani M, Re D, Tanaka T, Sidhu SK, Sano H (2006) Effect of different bur grinding on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 31(3):317–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lima LM, Motisuki C, dos Santos-Pinto L, dos Santos-Pinto A, Corat EJ (2006) Cutting characteristics of dental diamond burs made with CVD technology. Braz Oral Res 20(2):155–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P (2003) Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 28(5):647–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pangsrisomboon B, Harnirattisai C, Nilsri K, Burrow MF (2007) Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to differently prepared dentin. Am J Dent 20(4):259–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR (2007) Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent 35(6):467–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gagliardi RM, Avelar RP (2002) Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 27(6):582–586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Pearce MG, Brackett MG (2004) Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 91(1):42–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr (2003) The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 19(8):758–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Visuri SR, Gilbert JL, Wright DD, Wigdor HA, Walsh JT Jr (1996) Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J Dent Res 75(1):599–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ceballos L, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay F, Marshall GW (2002) Bonding to Er:YAG laser treated dentin. J Dent Res 81(2):119–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Esteves-Oliveira M, Zezell DM, Apel C, Turbino ML, Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P, Gutknecht N (2007) Bond strength of self-etching primer to bur cut, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Er:YAG lased dental surfaces. Photomed Laser Surg 25(5):373–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Nakamura G, Matsumoto K (1999) Ablation depths and morphological changes in human enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Surg 17(3):105–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aranha AC, Turbino ML, Powell GL, Eduardo Cde P (2005) Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Laser Surg Med 37(2):172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marotti J, Geraldo-Martins VR, Bello-Silva MS, de Paula Eduardo C, Apel C, Gutknecht N (2010) Influence of etching with erbium,chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on microleakage of class V restoration. Lasers Med Sci 25(3):325–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Palma Dibb RG, Milori Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Ferreira KC, Pereira Ramos R, Djalma Pécora J (2002) Assessing microleakage on class V composite resin restorations after Er:YAG laser preparation varying the adhesive systems. J Clin Laser Med Surg 20(3):129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, De Sá Rocha RA, Ramos TS, Palma-Dibb RG (2003) Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 30(10):1008–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, Palma Dibb RG (2004) Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 29(4):430–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bertrand MF, Semez G, Leforestier E, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP (2006) Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers Surg Med 38(6):615–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ (2008) Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J 53(2):172–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ergucu Z, Celik EU, Turkun M (2007) Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation. Gen Dent 55(1):27–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vieira AS, dos Santos MP, Antunes LA, Primo LG, Maia LC (2007) Preparation time and sealing effect of cavities prepared by an ultrasonic device and a high-speed diamond rotary cutting system. J Oral Sci 49(3):207–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rüya Yazici.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yazici, A.R., Yıldırım, Z., Antonson, S.A. et al. Comparison of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser with a chemical vapour deposition bur and conventional techniques for cavity preparation: a microleakage study. Lasers Med Sci 27, 23–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0833-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0833-6

Keywords

Navigation