Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength of two self-adhesive flowable composites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of two different self-adhesive flowable composite materials (SACs) to dentin. Forty extracted human molars were horizontally flattened to expose the dentin surfaces. The teeth were divided into eight groups according to the surface treatments (acid etching, Er:YAG laser quantum square pulse (QSP) mode, and Er:YAG laser medium-short pulse (MSP) mode at 10 Hz, 1.2 W, 120 mJ, and control-SiC) and SAC type (Vertise Flow and Fusio Liquid Dentin) (n = 5). Light cured 4-mm-high composite build-ups were made on the dentin surfaces, and the specimens were sectioned into serial sticks (n = 15). Later, the specimens were attached to microtensile testing machine and tensile force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure occurred. The failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×40 magnification, and one sample from each group was used for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test (α = 0.05). In all surface treatment groups along with the control groups, Vertise Flow showed better μTBS than the Fusio Liquid Dentin with the exception of the Er:YAG MSP mode surface treatment (p < 0.05). Etching with phosphoric acid and the Er:YAG QSP mode surface treatment significantly increased the μTBS of Vertise Flow (p < 0.05). Etching with phosphoric acid, Er:YAG QSP mode surface treatment, and Er:YAG MSP mode surface treatment significantly increased the μTBS of Fusio Liquid Dentin (p < 0.05). The μTBS of Vertise Flow was higher than the μTBS of Fusio Liquid Dentin. The Er:YAG laser irradiation increased the μTBS of both self-adhesive flowable resin composites in two pulse modes tested (MSP or QSP). However, the highest μTBS was recorded when Vertise Flow was applied with acid etching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M (1998) A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129(5):567–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goracci C, Margvelashvili M, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M (2013) Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 17(2):609–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B, Raab WH (1998) Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 26(8):649–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fornaini C, Riceputi D, Lupi-Pegurier L, Rocca JP (2012) Patient responses to Er:YAG laser when used for conservative dentistry. Lasers Med Sci 27(6):1143–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutknecht N, Lukac M, Marincek M, Perhavec T, Kazic M (2011) A novel quantum square pulse (QSP) mode erbium dental laser. J Lazer Health Acad 1(3):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM (1995) Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11(2):117–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC (2002) Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 33(3):213–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta R, Tewari S (2006) Effect of rotary instrumentation on composite bond strength with simulated pulpal pressure. Oper Dent 31(2):188–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ergucu Z, Celik EU, Unlu N, Turkun M, Ozer F (2009) Effect of Er, Cr:YSGG laser on the microtensile bond strength of two different adhesives to the sound and caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 34(4):460–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. da Silva MP, Barceleiro MO, Dias KR, Zanin F (2011) Shear bond strength of two adhesive systems bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. Gen Dent 59(3):e96–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rocha Gomes Torres C, Caneppele TM, Moral D, de Lazari R, Ribeiro CF, Borges AB (2012) Effect of dental surface treatment with Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers on bond strength of resin composite to recently bleached enamel. Lasers Med Sci 27(4):755–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Zafiriadis L, Koumpia E, Dionysopoulos P, Karagiannis V (2012) Bonding of adhesives to Er:YAG laser-treated dentin. Eur J Dent 6(1):16–23

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akin GE, Herguner-Siso S, Ozcan M, Ozel-Bektas O, Akin H (2012) Bond strengths of one-step self-etch adhesives to laser-irradiated and bur-cut dentin after water storage and thermocycling. Photomed Laser Surg 30(4):214–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salerno M, Derchi G, Thorat S, Ceseracciu L, Ruffilli R, Barone AC (2011) Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration. Dent Mater 27(12):1221–1228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC (2011) Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 27(3):259–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC (2011) Diffusion and concurrent solubility of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 27(2):197–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bektas OO, Eren D, Akin EG, Akin H (2013) Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite in terms of micro-shear bond strength and microleakage. Acta Odontol Scand 71(3–4):541–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M (2012) Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J 57(2):220–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yazici AR, Agarwal I, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros C, Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Mang T (2013) Effect of laser preparation on bond strength of a self-adhesive flowable resin. Lasers Med Sci 28(1):343–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2013) Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 29(2):221–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eliades A, Birpou E, Eliades T, Eliades G (2013) Self-adhesive restoratives as pit and fissure sealants: a comparative laboratory study. Dent Mater 29(7):752–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Isman E, Karaarslan ES, Oksayan R, Tuncdemir AR, Usumez S, Adanir N, Cebe MA (2012) Inadequate shear bond strengths of self-etch, self-adhesive systems for secure orthodontic bonding. Dent Mater J 31(6):947–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28(3):215–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Poss SD (2010) Utilization of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin. Dent Today 29(4):104–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Ferrari M (2012) Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83(6):454–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gurgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Gorucu J, Alpaslan T, Yazici E, Gutknecht N (2008) Shear bond strength of composite bonded to Er, Cr:YSGG laser-prepared dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 26(5):495–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramos AC, Esteves-Oliveira M, Arana-Chavez VE, de Paula EC (2010) Adhesives bonded to erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser-irradiated dentin: transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and tensile bond strength analyses. Lasers Med Sci 25(2):181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bahrami B, Askari N, Tielemans M, Heysselaer D, Lamard L, Peremans A, Nyssen-Behets C, Nammour S (2011) Effect of low fluency dentin conditioning on tensile bond strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci 26(2):187–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dunn WJ, Davis JT, Bush AC (2005) Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 21(7):616–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marotti J, Geraldo-Martins VR, Bello-Silva MS, de Paula EC, Apel C, Gutknecht N (2010) Influence of etching with erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on microleakage of class V restoration. Lasers Med Sci 25(3):325–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li ZZ, Code JE, Van De Merwe WP (1992) Er:YAG laser ablation of enamel and dentin of human teeth: determination of ablation rates at various fluences and pulse repetition rates. Lasers Surg Med 12(6):625–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H (1998) Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 77(6):1404–1414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ceballo L, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Marshall GW (2002) Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin. J Dent Res 81(2):119–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mjor IA, Gordan VV (2002) Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent 27(5):528–534

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sifa University, 35100, Izmir, Turkey

    Mustafa Altunsoy

  2. Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

    Murat Selim Botsali & Halenur Onat

  3. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Tugrul Sari

Authors
  1. Mustafa Altunsoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Murat Selim Botsali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tugrul Sari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Halenur Onat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Altunsoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altunsoy, M., Botsali, M.S., Sari, T. et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength of two self-adhesive flowable composites. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1667–1673 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1640-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1640-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation