Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of 1064-nm Nd:YAG long-pulse laser on polidocanol microfoam injected for varicose vein treatment: a controlled observational study of 404 legs, after 5-year-long treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sclerotherapy continues to be the treatment of choice for varicose veins in the legs. However, isolated treatment using microfoam or lasers requires a high number of sessions to eliminate them. In 2013, we published results about the efficacy and safety 3 years after the combined treatment with microfoam injections and subsequent application of Nd:YAG laser. The aim of this paper is to clinically evaluate the treatment of varices in a control visit after 5 years, when polidocanol microfoam is used and is immediately irradiated in the tissue with 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser beam. The outcome persistence after 5 years was studied in the legs that had received combined treatment and had been studied 3 years after treatment. Patients were contacted by phone, interviewed, and examined with echo-Doppler. Out of the 259 patients who were contacted, 221 agreed to make the appointment, although in the end, only 202 came, which meant analysing 404 legs. At 5 years, the clearance rates were very high: patients were included in class CEAP C1 showing vessels of from 0.5 to 3 mm diameter. The patients showed a high level of satisfaction. Regarding adverse effects, only 4 cases of hypopigmentation described in the previous publication persisted. Although the action mechanisms between the microfoam and the Nd:YAG laser must still be elucidated, it is notable that combining microfoam with laser exposure obtained a complete, effective treatment of legs in only 2 sessions, with high clearance rates and high level of satisfaction among patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mann MW (2011) Sclerotherapy: it is back and better. Clin Plast Surg 38(3):475–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleridge Smith P (2009) Sclerotherapy and foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Phlebology 24(6):260–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabe E, Schliephake D, Otto J et al (2010) Sclerotherapy of telangiectases and reticular veins: a double-blind randomized, comparative clinical trial of polidocanol, sodium tetradecyl sulphate and isotonic saline (EASI study). Phlebology 25(3):124–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alós J, Carreño P, López JA et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam: a controlled clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 31(1):101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadick NS, Prieto VG, Shea CR et al (2001) Clinical and pathophysiologic correlates of 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser treatment of reticular veins and venulectasias. Arch Dermatol 137(5):613–617

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadick NS (2001) Long-term results with a multiple synchronized-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of leg venulectasias and reticular veins. Dermatol Surg 27(4):365–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno-Moraga J, Smarandache A, Pascu ML et al (2014) 1064 nm Nd:YAG long pulse laser after polidocanol microfoam injection dramatically improves the result of leg vein treatment: a randomized controlled trial on 517 legs with a three-year follow-up. Phlebology 29(10):658–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smarandache A, Trelles M, Pascu ML (2010) Measurement of the modifications of polidocanol absorption spectra after exposure to NIR laser radiation. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 12(9):1942–1945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smarandache A (2012) Laser beams interaction with polidocanol foam: molecular background. Photomed Laser Surg 30(59):262–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno-Moraga J, Hernández E, Royo J et al (2013) Optimal and safe treatment of spider leg veins measuring less than 1.5 mm on skin type IV patients, using repeated low-fluence Nd:YAG laser pulses after polidocanol injection. Lasers Med Sci 28(3):925–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross EV, Domankevitz Y (2005) Laser treatment of leg veins: physical mechanisms and theoretical considerations. Lasers Surg Med 36(2):105–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tessari L (2001) Extemporary sclerosing foam according to personal method: experimental clinical data and catheter usage. Int Angiol 20(Suppl 1):54

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tessari L, Cavezzi A, Frullini A (2001) Preliminary experience with a new sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins. Dermatol Surg 27(1):58–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavezzi A, Frullini A, Ricci S et al (2002) Treatment of varicose veins by foam sclerotherapy: two clinical series. Phlebology 17(1):13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Redondo P, Cabrera J (2005) Microfoam sclerotherapy. Semin Cutan Med Surg 24(4):175–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trelles MA, Allones I, Alvarez J et al (2006) The 800-nm diode laser in the treatment of leg veins: assessment at 6 months. J Am Acad Dermatol 54(2):282–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadick N (2003) Laser treatment with a 1064-nm laser for lower extremity class I-III veins employing variable spots and pulse width parameters. Dermatol Surg 29(9):916–919

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mordon S, Brisot D, Fournier N (2003) Using a “non-uniform pulse sequence” can improve selective coagulation with a Nd:YAG laser (1.06 microm) thanks to met-hemoglobin absorption: a clinical study on blue leg veins. Lasers Surg Med 32(2):160–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy J, Elbahr C, Jouve E, Mordon S (2004) Comparison and sequential study of long pulsed Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser and sclerotherapy in leg telangiectasias treatment. Lasers Surg Med 34(3):273–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heger M, Beek JF, Moldovan NI et al (2005) Towards optimization of selective photothermolysis: prothrombotic pharmaceutical agents as potential adjuvants in laser treatment of port wine stains: a theoretical study. Thromb Haemost 93(2):242–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Conrad P, Malouf GM, Stacey MC (1995) The Australian polidocanol (aethoxyskclerol) study. Results at 2 years. Dermatol Surg 21(4):334–336 discussion 337-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parlar B, Blazek C, Cazzaniga S et al (2015) Treatment of lower extremity telangiectasias in women by foam sclerotherapy vs. Nd:YAG laser: a prospective, comparative, randomized, open-label trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 29(3):549–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ (2001) Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 29(5):416–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bäumler W, Ulrich H, Hartl A, Landthaler M, Shafirstein G (2006) Optimal parameters for the treatment of leg veins using Nd:YAG lasers at 1064 nm. Brit J Dermatol 155(2):364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parlette EC, Groff WF, Kinshella MJ et al (2006) Optimal pulse durations for the treatment of leg telangiectasias with a neodymium YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 38(2):98–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Murphy MJ, Torstensson PA (2014) Thermal relaxation times: an outdated concept in photothermal treatments. Lasers Surg Med 29(3):973–978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eckmann DM (2009) Polidocanol for endovenous microfoam sclerosant therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18(12):1919–1927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sommer AP, Zhu D, Mester AR, Försterling H-D (2011) Pulsed laser light forces cancer cells to absorb anticancer drugs--the role of water in nanomedicine. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 39:169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sommer AP, Caron A, Fecht HJ (2008) Tuning nanoscopic water layers on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces with laser light. Langmuir 24(3):635–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sommer AP, Bieschke J, Friedrich RP, Zhu D, Wanker EE, Fecht HJ, Mereles D, Hunstein W (2012) 670 nm laser light and EGCG complementarily reduce amyloid-β aggregates in human neuroblastoma cells: basis for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease? Photomed. Laser Surg 30:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sommer AP, Haddad MK, Fecht HJ (2015) Light effect on water viscosity: implication for ATP biosynthesis. Sci Rep 5:12029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nastasa V, Boni M, Stoicu A, Dinache A, Smarandache A, Pascu ML (2016) Lasers in foams and emulsions studies. In: Pascu ML (ed) Laser optofluidics in fighting multiple drug resistance. Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah, pp 303–350

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smarandache A, Staicu A, Nastasa V, Moreno-Moraga J, Royo de la Torre J, Trelles M, Pirvulescu R, Pascu ML (2015) Physical properties of laser irradiated sclerosing foams. Rom Rep Phys 67(4):1480–1490

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors Mihail L. Pascu and Adriana Smarandache were supported by MCI through the Nucleu Programme (ctr. no. 1813/2018) and CNCS/CCCDI - UEFISCDI project PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2016-0420.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Médico Láser, Madrid, Spain

    Javier Moreno-Moraga, Josefina Royo & Fernández David

  2. Laser Department, National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Bucharest, Romania

    Mihail L. Pascu & Adriana Smarandache

  3. Clínica Alcolea, Barcelona, Spain

    Justo M. Alcolea

  4. Fundación Antoni de Gimbernat, Instituto Médico Vilafortuny, Av. Vilafortuny 31, Cambrils, E43850, Tarragona, Spain

    Justo M. Alcolea & Mario A. Trelles

Authors
  1. Javier Moreno-Moraga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mihail L. Pascu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justo M. Alcolea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adriana Smarandache
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Josefina Royo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fernández David
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mario A. Trelles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario A. Trelles.

Ethics declarations

The interview and study methodology were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fundación Antoni de Gimbernat, and all patients who agreed to participate at control visit for evaluation of the results signed an informed consent form.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno-Moraga, J., Pascu, M.L., Alcolea, J.M. et al. Effects of 1064-nm Nd:YAG long-pulse laser on polidocanol microfoam injected for varicose vein treatment: a controlled observational study of 404 legs, after 5-year-long treatment. Lasers Med Sci 34, 1325–1332 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02736-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02736-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation