Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vertical transumbilical incision versus left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval during laparoscopic colorectal surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study compared the short-term surgical outcomes of the vertical transumbilical incision with the left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

One hundred forty-seven consecutive patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer between April 2010 and December 2010 were classified into one of the two groups according to the site of the minilaparotomy: a transumbilical incision group (n = 92) and a left lower transverse incision group (n = 55).

Results

Demographic data, operation time, estimated blood loss, frequency of transfusion, size of the tumor, number of harvested lymph nodes, distal resection margins, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay were similar between the two groups. Postoperative pain scores were also similar between the two groups. The length of the minilaparotomy incision was shorter in the transumbilical group than the left lower transverse group at operation (mean, 4.6 vs. 6.2 cm, p = 0.000). The postoperative mean satisfaction score was higher in the transumbilical group, but this was not statistically significant (7.6 vs. 7.1, p = 0.224). Fourteen patients in the transumbilical group and 7 patients in the left lower transverse group developed wound-related complications (p = 0.810), including two cases of incisional hernia, both in the transumbilical group. High body mass index (≥25 kg/m2) and longer operative time (≥180 min) were risk factors for wound complications on univariate analysis.

Conclusions

Transumbilical minilaparotomy in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a good alternative approach with acceptable wound complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hemandas AK, Abdelrahman T, Flashman KG et al (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery. Ann Surg 252:84–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang SB, Park JS, Kim DW, Lee TG (2010) Intraoperative technical difficulty during laparoscopy-assisted surgery as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1400–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawahara H, Kobayashi T, Watanabe K, Kobayashi S, Kashiwagi H, Yanaga K (2009) Where is the best surgical incision for laparoscopic anterior resection? Hepatogastroenterology 56:1629–1632

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hidalgo JM, Targarona EM, Martinez C, Hernandez P, Balague C, Trias M (2010) Laparoscopic rectal surgery: does immediate outcome differ in respect to sex? Dis Colon Rectum 53:438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL et al (2012) Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications. Tech Coloproctol 16:127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25:1031–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takemasa I, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M et al (2010) Video. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawahara H, Watanabe K, Ushigome T, Noaki R, Kobayashi S, Yanaga K (2010) Umbilical incision laparoscopic surgery with one assist port for anterior resection. Dig Surg 27:364–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song F, Glenny AM (1998) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 85:1232–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanner J, Khan D, Aplin C, Ball J, Thomas M, Bankart J (2009) Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs. J Hosp Infect 72:243–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ et al (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243:667–670 Discussion 670–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 1:17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant from Chonnam National University 2010 and Dalim Tech, Seoul Korea.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. R. Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, S.W., Huh, J.W., Kim, Y.J. et al. Vertical transumbilical incision versus left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 17, 59–65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0883-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0883-9

Keywords

Navigation