Skip to main content
Log in

An exact method for the multiple comparison of several polynomial regression models with applications in dose-response study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the multiple comparison during the past 60 years or so has focused mainly on the comparison of several population means. Spurrier (J Am Stat Assoc 94:483–488, 1999) and Liu et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 99:395–403, 2004) considered the multiple comparison of several linear regression lines. They assumed that there was no functional relationship between the predictor variables. For the case of the polynomial regression model, the functional relationship between the predictor variables does exist. This lack of a full utilization of the functional relationship between the predictor variables may have some undesirable consequences. In this article we introduce an exact method for the multiple comparison of several polynomial regression models. This method sufficiently takes advantage of the feature of the polynomial regression model, and therefore, it can quickly and accurately compute the critical constant. This proposed method allows various types of comparisons, including pairwise, many-to-one and successive, and it also allows the predictor variable to be either unconstrained or constrained to a finite interval. The examples from the dose-response study are used to illustrate the method. MATLAB programs have been written for easy implementation of this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, M.B., Forsythe, A.B.: The ANOVA and multiple comparisons for data with heterogeneous variances. Biometrics 30(4), 719–724 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, O.J.: Multiple comparisons among means. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56(293), 52–64 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, C.W.: A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50, 1096–1121 (1955)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D.G., Hsu, J.C.: Multiple comparisons with the best treatment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 33(384), 965–971 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K.R.: A simple method of multiple comparisons of means. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 73(364), 724–729 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y., Liu, W., Bretz, F., Wan, F.: Simultaneous confidence bands for a percentile line in linear regression. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 81, 1–9 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo, M., Takahashi, S., Nishiyama, T.: Multiple comparisons among mean vectors when the dimension is larger than the total sample size. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 43(10), 2283–2306 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khattree, R., Naik, D.N.: Applied Multivariate Statistics with SAS Software, 2nd edn, p. 75. SAS Institute Inc, Cary (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Bretz, F., Hayter, A.J., Wynn, H.P.: Assessing nonsuperiority, noninferiority, or equivalence when comparing two regression models over a restricted covariate region. Biometrics 65, 1279–1287 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Jamshidian, M., Zhang, Y.: Multiple comparison of several linear regression lines. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 99, 395–403 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W.: Simultaneous Inference in Regression, pp. 197–215. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piegorsch, W.W.: Multiple comparisons for analyzing dichotomous response. Biometrics 47(1), 45–52 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Piegorsch, W.W., Bailer, A.J.: Analyzing Environmental Data, p. 434. Wiley, New York (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potthoff, R.F.: On the Johnson–Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika 29, 241–256 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H.: A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 40, 87–104 (1953)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, T., Mano, S., Fujikoshi, Y.: A generalized Tukey conjecture for multiple comparisons among mean vectors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89(426), 676–679 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spurrier, J.D.: Exact confidence bounds for all contrasts of three or more regression lines. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94, 483–488 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stoline, M.R., Ury, H.K.: Tables of the studentized maximum modulus distribution and an application to multiple comparisons among means. Technometrics 9(1), 167–178 (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tamhane, A.C.: A comparison of procedures for multiple comparisons of means with unequal variances. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74(366a), 471–480 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1953) The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript, p. 1–300. Princeton University, Department of Statistics

  • Ury, H.K.: Comparison of four procedures for multiple comparisons among means (pairwise contrasts) for arbitrary sample sizes. Technometrics 18(1), 89–97 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanyu Zhou.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, S. An exact method for the multiple comparison of several polynomial regression models with applications in dose-response study. AStA Adv Stat Anal 102, 413–429 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-017-0313-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-017-0313-4

Keywords

Navigation