Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of mobile devices for medical image capture has become increasingly popular given the widespread use of smartphone cameras. Prior studies have generally compared mobile phone capture images to digitized images. However, many underserved and rural areas without picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) still depend greatly on the use of film radiographs. Additionally, there is a scarcity of specialty-trained or formally licensed radiologists in many of these regions. Subsequently, there is great potential for the use of smartphone capture of plain radiograph films which would allow for increased access to economical and efficient consultation from board-certified radiologists abroad. The present study addresses the ability to diagnose a subset of radiographic findings identified on both the original film radiograph and the captured camera phone image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Telecommunication Union. Available at http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx; Accessed August 30, 2013

  2. Population Reference Bureau. Available at http://www.prb.org/Publications/Datasheets/2012/world-population-data-sheet/world-map.aspx#/map/population; Accessed August 30, 2013

  3. Brault B, Hoskinson J, Armbrust L, Milliken G: Comparison of Seven Digital Cameras for Digitizing Radiographs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 45:298–304, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Corr P, Couper I, Beningfield SJ, Mars M: A simple telemedicine system using a digital camera. J Telemed Telecare 6(4):233–236, 2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salazar AJ, Camacho JC, Aguirre DA: Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach. J Digit Imaging 25(1):91–100, 2012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Szot A, Jacobson FL, Munn S, Jazayeri D, Nardell E, Harrison D, Fraser HSF: Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays acquired using a digital camera for low-cost teleradiology. Int J Med Inform 73(1):65–73, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Padmasekara G, Nazarian N, Wall C: The reliability of mobile multimedia messaging (MMS) for decision making in distal radius fractures: an effective alternative. J Mob Technol Med 1:8–12, 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamirel C, Bruce BB, Wright DW, Newman NJ, Biousse V: Nonmydriatic digital ocular fundus photography on the iPhone 3G: the FOTO-ED study. Arch Ophthalmol 130:939–940, 2012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bullard TB, Rosenberg MS, Ladde J, Razack N, Villalobos HJ, Papa L: Digital images taken with a mobile phone can assist in the triage of neurosurgical patients to a level 1 trauma centre. J Telemed Telecare 19(2):80–83, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tennant JN, Shankar V, Dirschl DR: Reliability and Validity of a Mobile Phone for Radiographic Assessment of Ankle Injuries: A Randomized Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement Study. Foot Ankle Int 34:228, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amir E, Kaffe I, Peretz B: Digital images obtained with a digital camera are no associated with a loss of critical information—a preliminary study. Br Dent J 206(5):268–9, 2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davidson HC, Johnston DJ, Christian ME, Harnsberger HR: Comparison of Radiographic Image Quality From Four Digitzation Devices as Viewed on Computer Monitors. J Digit Imaging 14(1):24–29, 2001

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Delong ER, Delong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845, 1988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamada M, Watarai H, Andou T, Sakai N: Emergency image transfer system through a mobile telephone in Japan: technical note. Neurosurgery 52:986–990, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Judith Aronchick, MD and Michael Love, MD, for providing access to their film-based radiology teaching files.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mindy Y. Licurse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Licurse, M.Y., Kim, S.H., Kim, W. et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of plain film radiographs between original film and smartphone capture: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging 28, 646–653 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9783-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9783-7

Keywords

Navigation