Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Income-Related Biases in International Trade: What Do Trademark Registration Data Tell Us?

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rich countries trade more among themselves than with poor economies due to a closer match of exporter supply structures and importer preferences. In the literature, the closeness of supply and demand has traditionally been determined by the quality of products—as expressed in the Linder hypothesis. This paper examines an extension of the hypothesis by considering the extent of brand differentiation as another determinant of the closeness of supply and demand. The analysis employs information on international trademark registrations to test whether richer countries import more from countries exporting products of higher quality and greater brand differentiation. The hypothesis is confirmed in most consumer goods sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics (84) (3): 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allegrezza, S., and A. Guard-Rauchs (1999). The Determinants of Trademark Deposits: An Econometric Investigation (A Case Study of the BENELUX). Economie Appliquée 52 (2): 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, J. E. (1979). A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, J. E., and E. van Wincoop (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (1): 170–192.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baroncelli, E., C. Fink, and B. S. Javorcik (2005). The Global Distribution of Trademarks: Some Stylized Facts. The World Economy, forthcoming.

  6. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–481.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (1): 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradford, S. (2003). Paying the Price: Final Goods Protection in OECD Countries. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1): 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In J. A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  10. Falvey, R., and H. Kierzkowski (1987). Product Quality, Intra-Industry Trade and Imperfect Competition. In H. Kierzkowski (ed.), Protection and Competition in International Trade. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  11. Fink, C., A. Mattoo, and I. C. Neagu (2002). Assessing the Impact of Communication Costs on International Trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2929. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  12. Flam, H., and E. Helpman (1987). Vertical Product Differentiation and North-South Trade. American Economic Review 77 (5): 810–822.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  14. Hallak, J. C. (2001). The Effect of Cross-Country Differences in Product Quality on International Trade Flows. Mimeo. Harvard University.

  15. Helpman, E., and P. R. Krugman (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  16. Hummels, D. (1999). Towards a Geography of Trade Costs. Mimeo. University of Chicago.

  17. Hummels, D., and P. J. Klenow (2002). The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Trade. NBER Working Paper 8712. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

  18. Interbrand (2004). Brands and Branding. www.interbrand.com.

  19. Klein, B., and K. B. Leffler (1981). The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 615–641.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leamer, E., and J. Levinsohn (1995). International Trade Theory: The Evidence. In G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds.), Handbook of International Economics. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  21. Linder, S. B. (1961). An Essay on Trade and Transformation. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.

  22. Maskus, K. E., and Y. Chen (2002). Vertical Price Control and Parallel Imports: Theory and Evidence. Pacific Economic Review 7 (2): 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy, K. M., and A. Shleifer (1997). Quality and Trade. Journal of Development Economics 53 (1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 78 (2): 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rauch, J. E. (1999). Networks versus Markets in International Trade. Journal of International Economics 48 (1): 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Redding, S., and A. J. Venables (2004). Economic Geography and International Inequality. Journal of International Economics 62 (1): 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schott, P. (2001). Do Rich and Poor Countries Specialize in a Different Mix of Goods? NBER Working Paper 8492. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

  28. Schmalensee, R. (1978). A Model of Advertising and Product Quality. Journal of Political Economy 86 (3): 485–503.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shapiro, C. (1982). Consumer Information, Product Quality, and Seller Reputation. The Bell Journal of Economics 13 (1): 20–35.

  30. Smarzynska, B. (2001). Does Relative Location Matter for Bilateral Trade Flows? An Extension of the Gravity Model, Journal of Economic Integration 16 (3): 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Soloaga, I., and L. A. Winters (1999). How Has Regionalism in the 1990s Affected Trade? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2156. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  32. Stokey, N. L. (1991). The Volume and Composition of Trade Between Rich and Poor Countries. The Review of Economic Studies 58 (1): 63–80.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beata Smarzynska Javorcik.

Additional information

JEL no.

F 10, O 34

About this article

Cite this article

Fink, C., Smarzynska Javorcik, B. & Spatareanu, M. Income-Related Biases in International Trade: What Do Trademark Registration Data Tell Us?. Rev. World Econ. 141, 79–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-005-0016-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-005-0016-x

Keywords

Navigation