Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of Leaf Water Potential, Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Rainfed Hazelnut

Quantifizierung des Blattwasserpotentials, der stomatären Leitfähigkeit und der photosynthetisch aktiven Strahlung bei nicht bewässerten Haselnüssen

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) is mostly grown in rainfed condition in Turkey as well as other some countries in the world without more yield reduction. However, there is not enough information about how to give yield without more reduction in rainfed hazelnut orchard. In an endeavor to search this question, quantifications of leaf water potential (LWP), stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of hazelnut tree were investigated in rainfed hazelnut orchard in the summer of 2013 and 2014. Additionally, possible effects of those quantifications on rainfed hazelnut trees vs. soil water content (SWC) was investigated. Results of this study exhibited that yearly ET (evapotranspiration) of rainfed hazelnut trees was higher in 2014 than 2013 even though seasonal ET of rainfed hazelnut trees was higher in 2013 than 2014. Hence, yield, LWP and gs were higher in 2014 than 2013 but PAR and SWC (even all the study season) were mostly higher in 2013 than 2014. Moreover, relationships of LWP, gs and PAR and responses of LWP, gs and PAR to SWC were non stronger. These differences could be attributed differences of climate variability such as precipitation and temperature during the observed period throughout the season in the studied years. However, rainfed hazelnut trees may be required supplement irrigation in dry summer, such as year of 2013, to avoid summer water stress. Finally, it can be concluded that hazelnut trees can be grown well and give normal yield for the areas which have about 950 mm precipitation.

Zusammenfassung

Haselnüsse (Corylus avellana L.) werden in der Türkei und in einigen anderen Ländern der Welt meist ohne Bewässerung angebaut, ohne dass eine Ertragsminderung beobachtet wird. Jedoch gibt es nicht genug Information darüber, warum in den nicht bewässerten Haselnussplantagen keine Ertragsreduktionen auftreten. Um dieser Frage nachzugehen, wurden in einer nicht bewässerten Haselnussplantage in den Sommern 2013 und 2014 Quantifizierungen des Blattwasserpotentials (LWP), der stomatären Leitfähigkeit (gs) und der photosynthetisch aktiven Strahlung (PAR) durchgeführt. Zusätzlich wurden mögliche Effekte des Bodenwassergehaltes (SWC) untersucht. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studien ergaben, dass die jährliche ET (Evapotranspiration) bei nicht bewässerten Haselnusssträuchern 2014 höher war als 2013, während die ET in der Vegetationsperiode 2013 höher war als 2014. Infolgedessen waren Ertrag, LWP und gs 2014 höher als 2013, aber PAR und SWC (sogar während des gesamten Versuchszeitraumes) waren 2013 meist höher als 2014. Darüber hinaus waren die Relationen zwischen LWP, gs und PAR nicht enger als wenn der Bodenwassergehalt berücksichtigt wurde. Die saisonalen Abweichungen der Versuchsjahre könnten Klimaunterschieden wie Niederschlag und Temperatur zugeordnet werden. Jedoch könnte in einem Sommer, wie 2013, eine Zusatzbewässerung nötig sein, um Wasserstress zu vermeiden. Abschließend kann gefolgert werden, dass Haselnusssträucher in Gebieten mit etwa 950 mm Niederschlag problemlos angebaut werden können und eine normale Ernte einbringen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awada T, Josiah S (2007) Physiological responses of four hazelnut hybrids to water availability in Nebraska. Gt Plains Res 17(2):193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger E, Garnier A (1985) Testing water potential in peach trees as an indicator of water stress. J Hortic Sci 60:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bignami C, Cristofori V, Bertazza G (2011) Effects of Water Availability on Hazelnut Yield and Seed Composition during Fruit Growth. Acta Hortic 922:333–340 (XXVIIIth IHC – IS on Water Use in a Changing World)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bittelli M (2011) Measuring soil water content: a review. Horttechnology 21(3):293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett ES, van Lersel WM (2008) Morphology and irrigation efficiency of Gaura Lindheimeri grown with capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation. HortScience 43(5):1555–1560

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell GS, Norman JM (1989) The description and measurement of plant canopy structure. In: Russell G, Marshall B, Jarvis PG (eds) Plant canopies: their growth, form and function, vol 1989. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, pp 1–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Mehlenbacher SA, Smith DC (2007) Hazelnut accessions provide new sources of resistance to eastern filbert blight. HortScience 42:466–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofori V, Muleo R, Bignami C, Rugini E (2014) Long term evaluation of Hazelnut response to drip irrigation. Acta Hort 1052:179–185 (Proc. VIIIth International Congress on Hazelnut)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CTM (2015) Activity report of general directorate of cooperative in customs and trade ministry (CTM) of Turkey. CTM, Ankara (In Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dağdelen N, Basal H, Yılmaz E, Gurbuz T, Akcay S (2009) Different drip irrigation treatments affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey. Agric Water Manag 96:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DPDA (2015) Activity report of Düzce provincial directorate of agriculture. Düzce Provincial Directorate of Agriculture (DPDA, Düzce (In Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). http://www.fao.org. Accessed 28. March 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Gispert JR, Ramírez de Cartagena F, Villar JM, Rovira M (2015) Efecto del volumen de suelo húmedo en riego localizado para el cultivo del avellano (Corylus avellana L.). ITEA 111(2):109–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonenc S, Tanrıvermis H, Bulbul M (2006) Economic assessment of hazelnut production and the importance of supply management approaches in Turkey. J Agric Rural Dev Trop 107:19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau P (2009) Manual of European Hazelnut. Bulletin INIA, vol. 195. INIA, Chillan, p 96 (In Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg EH, Saugier B, Pontailler J‑Y, Black TA, Chen W, Hurdle PA, Wu A (2000) Responses of trembling aspen and hazelnut to vapor pressure deficit in a boreal deciduous forest. Tree Physiol 20:725–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanber R (1999) Pan evaporation methods used for estimation of crop evapotranspiration. Workshop on Experimental Methodologies for Determining Evapotranspiration: Review and Revision, Adana, 6.-12. Dec 1998., pp 1–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Karadeniz T, Bostan SZ, Tuncer C, Tarakçioğlu C (2008) Hazelnut growing. presidential of agriculture chamber of Erfelek, Sinop. (In Turkish) http://www.ezob.org.tr/findik.pdf. Accessed 26. März 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen B, Shackel K, Southwick S, Olson W (2001) Deficit irrigation strategies using midday stem water potential in prune. Irrig Sci 20(2):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen B, Udompetaikul V, Browne G, Metcalf S, Stewart W, Contador L, Negro C, Upadhyaya S (2012) A mobile platform for measuring canopy photosynthetically active radiation interception in orchard systems. Horttechnology 22(2):237–244

  • Marsal J, Girona J, Mata M (1997) Leaf water relation parameters in almond compared to hazelnut trees during a deficit irrigation period. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122(4):582–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingeau M, Ameglio T, Pons B, Rousseau P (1994) Effects of water stress on development, growth and yield of hazelnut trees. Acta Hortic 351:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özmen S (2013) Irrigation water use and water table in Düzce area. Duezce Univ J Sci Technol 1:47–57 (In Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RG, Calvin LD et al (1965) Sampling methods of soil analysis. In: Black CA (ed) Part 1 Agron, vol 9. ASA, Madison, pp 54–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook, vol. 60. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati A, Metcalf S, Buchner R, Fulton A, Lampinen B (2006) Tree water status and gas exchange in walnut under drought, high temperature and vapor pressure deficit. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 81(3):415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati A, Metcalf SG, Buchner RP, Fulton AE, Lampinen BD (2007) Effects of kaolin application on light absorption and distribution, radiation use efficiency and photosynthesis of almond and walnut canopies. Ann Bot 99:255–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tous J, Girona J, Tasias J (1994) Cultural practices and cost of hazelnut production. Acta Hortic 351:395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tüzüner A (1990) Guide line for soil and water analysis. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, p 375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks DUBAP (Düzce University Scientific Research Projects: 2013.23.01.131 and 2013.23.01.196) for its financial support of this study. Furthermore, the author thanks Mrs. Yasemin Karslioğlu – who is the owner of Karslioğlu Farm for opening their farms to search of these studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selçuk Özmen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özmen, S. Quantification of Leaf Water Potential, Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Rainfed Hazelnut. Erwerbs-Obstbau 58, 273–280 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0292-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0292-8

Keywords

Schlüssselwörter

Navigation