Skip to main content
Log in

Low levels of genetic variation within introduced Javan rusa deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in Australia

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Javan rusa deer (Cervus timorensis russa) is one of six introduced wild deer species in Australia. The largest population is located in the Royal National Park (RNP), New South Wales, Australia. Although the deer are considered a pest in certain areas, they are also commercially valuable. Using molecular markers we aimed to characterise the level of genetic diversity within the RNP population and identify a possible genetic bottleneck associated with the introduction of seven founding individuals. We also aimed to identify appropriate polymorphic microsatellite loci that could assist in commercial breeding programmes and wild population management in Australia. The results indicate that Javan rusa deer from the RNP (n=37) had an average (±SE) of only 2.29±0.095 alleles/locus, which is substantially lower than that reported in source populations from New Caledonia (7.60±0.933 alleles/locus). These data combined with the presence of ‘genetic reduction signatures’ (P<0.001) indicate that this population has experienced a population bottleneck possibly at the time of establishment in Australia. Despite low allelic diversity, the large suite of identified polymorphic loci (n=24) shows promise for applications in population genetics, including parentage analysis (total parentage exclusion 0.944) within Australia. These data will contribute significantly to improving commercial breeding programmes and possibly to wild population management plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anderson JD, Honeycutt RL, Gonzales RA, Gee KL, Skow LC, Gallagher RL, Honeycutt DA, DeYoung RW (2002) Development of microsatellite DNA markers for the automated genetic characterization of white-tailed deer populations. J Wildl Manage 66:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley A (1998) An introduction to the deer of Australia: with special reference to Victoria. Australian Deer Research Foundation, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet A, Thevenon S, Maudet F, Maillard JC (2002) Efficiency of semi-automated fluorescent multiplex PCRs with 11 microsatellite markers for genetic studies of deer populations. Anim Genet 33:343–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broders HG, Mahoney SP, Montevecchi WA, Davidson WS (1999) Population genetic structure and the effect of founder events on the genetic variability of moose, Alces alces, in Canada. Mol Ecol 8:1309–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Honeycutt RL, Rooney AP, Gonzales RA, Gee KL (2003) Genetic consequences of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) restoration in Mississippi. Mol Ecol 12:3237–3252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • English AW (1984) Rusa and chital deer in Australia, their biology and management. In: Deer refresher course, vol 72. The University of Sydney, Australia, pp 407–415

  • Fickel J, Reinsch A (2000) Microsatellite markers for the European Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Mol Ecol 9:994–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annu Rev Genet 29:305–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galan M, Cosson JF, Aulagnier S, Maillard JC, Thevenon S, Hewison AJM (2003) Cross-amplification tests of ungulate primers in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to develop a multiplex panel of 12 microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol Notes 3:142–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenney Williams C, Serfass TL, Cogan R, Rhodes OE Jr (2002) Microsatellite variation in the reintroduced Pennsylvania elk herd. Mol Ecol 11:1299–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luikart G, Sherwin WB, Steele BM, Allendorf FW (1998) Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Mol Ecol 7:963–974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty A, English AW, Mulley RC, Priddel D, Richardson B (2001) Status, distribution and potential impact of feral deer in Australia: a case study—rusa deer in the Royal National Park, NSW. In: 12th Australasian vertebrate pest conference. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne, pp 358–360

  • NSW NPWS (2002a) Deer management plan for Royal National Park and NPWS Reserves in the Sydney South region. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney, Australia, pp 18

  • NSW NPWS (2002b) Draft fire management plan for Royal, Heathcote National Parks and Garawarra State Recreation Area. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney, Australia, pp 107

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Roed KH, Midthjell L (1998) Microsatellites in reindeer, Rangifer tarandus, and their use in other cervids. Mol Ecol 7:1773–1776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slate J, Coltman DW, Goodman SJ, Maclean I, Pemberton JM, Williams JL (1998) Bovine microsatellite loci are highly conserved in red deer (Cervus elaphus), sika deer (Cervus nippon) and soay sheep (Ovis aries). Anim Genet 29:307–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J (2000) A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol Ecol 9:801–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sunnucks P, Hales DF (1996) Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Mol Biol Evol 13:510–524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot J, Haigh J, Plante Y (1996) A parentage evaluation test in North American elk (Wapiti) using microsatellites of ovine and bovine origin. Anim Genet 27:117–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckwell C (2001) Deer: quality assurance, strategic alliances and industry development. Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton, ACT, Australia, pp 63

  • Tuckwell C (2003) The deer farming handbook. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia

  • Wilson GA, Strobeck C, Wu L, Coffin JW (1997) Characterization of microsatellite loci in caribou Rangifer tarandus and their use in other artiodactyls. Mol Ecol 6:697–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the managers and handlers at the deer handling facility for their invaluable assistance in collecting the tissue samples and Mark Eldridge and Adam Stow (Macquarie University) for their helpful comments and discussion of the manuscript. Research was carried out in accordance with Macquarie University AEC permit number 2001/017. The Australian Research Council supported this work through a SPIRT grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. S. Webley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webley, L.S., Zenger, K.R., English, A.W. et al. Low levels of genetic variation within introduced Javan rusa deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in Australia. Eur J Wildl Res 50, 137–140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0048-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0048-x

Keywords

Navigation