Abstract
Purpose
To determine the central corneal thickness (CCT) in Japanese children and to investigate the changes in CCT with increasing age.
Methods
Pachymetry was performed on 338 eyes of 169 patients undergoing eye muscle surgery under general anesthesia, and the intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured on 312 eyes of 156 of those same patients. Patients with abnormalities other than refractive errors and strabismus were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups: group 1, ≤1 year of age; group 2, 2–4; group 3, 5–9; and group 4, 10–18 years of age. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the significance of the changes in CCT.
Results
The average CCT of the right eye was 544.3 ± 36.9 μm. The CCT was thinner in group 1 than in groups 3 and 4 (ANOVA, P = 0.02). There was a positive but weak correlation between IOP and CCT (IOP = 6.253 + 0.014 × CCT; r 2 = 0.047, P = 0.007).
Conclusions
CCT reaches the adult thickness in Japanese children by age 5 years. The average CCT is thinner in Japanese children than in Caucasians but thicker than in African American children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 2001;108:1779–1788.
Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714–720; discussion 829–830.
Chatterjee A, Shah S, Bessant DA, et al. Reduction in intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Correlation with pretreatment myopia. Ophthalmology 1997;104: 355–359.
Mardelli PG, Piebenga LW, Whitacre MM, Siegmund KD. The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 1997;104:945–948; discussion 9.
Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:34–43.
Henriques MJ, Vessani RM, Reis FA, et al. Corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2004;13:185–188.
Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Barequet IS. Central corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma. Cornea 2006;25:923–925.
Simon JW, O’Malley MR, Gandham SB, et al. Central corneal thickness and glaucoma in aphakic and pseudophakic children. J AAPOS 2005;9:326–329.
Tai TY, Mills MD, Beck AD, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal diameter in patients with childhood glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2006;15:524–528.
Simsek T, Mutluay AH, Elgin U, et al. Glaucoma and increased central corneal thickness in aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1103–1106.
Kirwan C, O’Keefe M. Paediatric aphakic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:734–739.
Muir KW, Duncan L, Enyedi LB, et al. Central corneal thickness: congenital cataracts and aphakia. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:502–506.
La Rosa FA, Gross RL, Orengo-Nania S. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:23–27.
Shimmyo M, Ross AJ, Moy A, Mostafavi R. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:603–613.
Aghaian E, Choe JE, Lin S, Stamper RL. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans, and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic. Ophthalmology 2004;111:2211–2219.
Muir KW, Duncan L, Enyedi LB, Freedman SF. Central corneal thickness in children: Racial differences (black vs. white) and correlation with measured intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2006;15:520–523.
Dai E, Gunderson CA. Pediatric central corneal thickness variation among major ethnic populations. J AAPOS 2006;10:22–25.
Evereklioglu C, Yilmaz K, Bekir NA. Decreased central corneal thickness in children with Down syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2002;39:274–277.
Sultan G, Baudouin C, Auzerie O, et al. Cornea in Marfan disease: Orbscan and in vivo confocal microscopy analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1757–1764.
Brandt JD, Casuso LA, Budenz DL. Markedly increased central corneal thickness: an unrecognized fi nding in congenital aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:348–350.
Suzuki S, Oshika T, Oki K, et al. Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29:1313–1318.
Wu LL, Suzuki Y, Ideta R, Araie M. Central corneal thickness of normal tension glaucoma patients in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000;44:643–647.
Thomas J, Wang J, Rollins AM, Sturm J. Comparison of corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, ultrasonic pachymetry, and a scanning slit method. J Refract Surg 2006;22:671–678.
Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography vs ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:228–232.
Mishima S. Corneal thickness. Surv Ophthalmol 1968;13:57–96.
Airiani S, Trokel SL, Lee SM, Braunstein RE. Evaluating central corneal thickness measurements with noncontact optical lowcoherence refl ectometry and contact ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:164–165.
Bovelle R, Kaufman SC, Thompson HW, Hamano H. Corneal thickness measurements with the Topcon SP-2000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:868–870.
Remon L, Cristobal JA, Castillo J, et al. Central and peripheral corneal thickness in full-term newborns by ultrasonic pachymetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:3080–3083.
Hussein MA, Paysse EA, Bell NP, et al. Corneal thickness in children. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:744–748.
Nomura H, Ando F, Niino N, et al. The relationship between age and intraocular pressure in a Japanese population: the infl uence of central corneal thickness. Curr Eye Res 2002;24:81–85.
Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Araie M. Corneal thickness in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1327–1336.
Autzen T, Bjornstrom L. Central corneal thickness in full-term newborns. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1989;67:719–720.
Autzen T, Bjornstrom L. Central corneal thickness in premature babies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1991;69:251–252.
Ehlers N, Sorensen T, Bramsen T, Poulsen EH. Central corneal thickness in newborns and children. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1976;54:285–290
Sawa M. Measurement of corneal thickness. Jap Rev Clin Ophthalmol (Ganka Rinsho Iho) 1986;80:177–184.
Muir KW, Jin J, Freedman SF. Central corneal thickness and its relationship to intraocular pressure in children. Ophthalmology 2004;111:2220–2223.
Kao SF, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, et al. Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1541–1544.
Bordon AF, Katsumi O, Hirose T. Tonometry in pediatric patients: a comparative study among Tono-pen, Perkins, and Schiotz tonometers. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995;32:373–377.
Dohadwala AA, Munger R, Damji KF. Positive correlation between Tono-Pen intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1849–1854.
Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1389–1392.
Yildirim N, Sahin A, Basmak H, Bal C. Effect of central corneal thickness and radius of the corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured with the Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in healthy schoolchildren. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2007;44:216–222.
Dominguez A, Banos S, Alvarez G, et al. Intraocular pressure measurement in infants under general anesthesia. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:110–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Hikoya, A., Sato, M., Tsuzuki, K. et al. Central corneal thickness in Japanese children. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53, 7–11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0619-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0619-6