Abstract
Purpose
To determine the areas of the binocular visual field (VF) associated with reading speed in glaucomatous patients with preserved visual acuity (VA).
Materials and methods
Fifty-four patients with glaucoma (mean age ± standard deviation 70 ± 8 years) and 38 visually healthy controls (mean age 66 ± 9 years) had silent reading speeds measured using non-scrolling text on a computer setup. Participants completed three cognitive tests and tests of visual function, including the Humphrey 24-2 threshold VF test in each eye; the results were combined to produce binocular integrated VFs (IVFs). Regression analyses using the control group to correct for cognitive test scores, age and VA were conducted to obtain the IVF mean deviation (MD) and total deviation (TD) value from each IVF test location. Concordance between reading speed and TD, assessed using R 2 statistics, was ranked in order of importance to explore the parts of the IVF most likely to be linked with reading speed.
Results
No significant association between IVF MD value and reading speed was observed (p = 0.38). Ranking individual thresholds indicated that the inferior left section of the IVF was most likely to be associated with reading speed.
Conclusions
Certain regions of the binocular VF impairment may be associated with reading performance even in patients with preserved VA. The inferior left region of patient IVFs may be important for changing lines during reading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspinall PA, Johnson ZK, Azuara-Blanco A, Montarzino A, Brice R, Vickers A. Evaluation of quality of life and priorities of patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1907–15.
Gutierrez PR, Wilson MR, Johnson CA, Gordon M, Cioffi GA, Ritch R, et al. Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:777–84.
Parrish RK 2nd, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1447–55.
Lee BL, Gutierrez PR, Gordon MO, Wilson MR, Cioffi GA, Ritch R, et al. The glaucoma symptom scale: a brief index of glaucoma-specific symptoms. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:861–6.
Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, Janz NK, Klein R, Owsley C, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:227–33.
Nelson P, Aspinall P, O’Brien C. Patients’ perception of visual impairment in glaucoma: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:546–52.
Janz NK, Wren PA, Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Guire KE. Quality of life in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients: the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:887–97.
Altangerel UMD, Spaeth GLM, Rhee DJM. Visual function, disability, and psychological impact of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14:100–5.
Spaeth GLM, Walt JG, Keener J. Evaluation of quality of life for patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:3–14.
Freeman EE, Munoz B, West SK, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Glaucoma and quality of life: the salisbury eye evaluation. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:233–8.
Altangerel UMD, Spaeth GLM, Steinmann WC. Assessment of function relation to vision (AFREV). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13:67–80.
Burton R, Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Garway-Heath DF. Glaucoma and reading: exploring the effects of contrast lowering of text. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1282–7.
Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Glaucoma and reading speed: the salisbury eye evaluation project. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:82–7.
Ramulu PY, Swenor BK, Jefferys JL, Friedman DS, Rubin GS. Difficulty with out-loud and silent reading in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(1):666–72.
Roberts KF, Haymes SA, LeBlanc RP, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC, Artes PH. Contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, reading speed and macular visual field damage in glaucoma. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting. Ft Lauderdale. 2005.
West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Turano KA. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE project salisbury eye evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:774–80.
Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70:54–65.
Tabrett DR, Lathan K. Important areas of the central binocular visual field for daily functioning in the visually impaired. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32:156–63.
Murata H, Hirasawa H, Aoyama Y, Sugisaki K, Araie M, Mayama C, et al. Identifying areas of the visual field important for quality of life in patients with glaucoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–7.
Cummings RW, Rubin GS. Reading speed and saccadic eye movements with an artifical paracentral scotoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1318.
Ishii M, Seki M, Harigai R, Abe H, Fukuchi T. Reading performance in patients with glaucoma evaluated using the MNREAD charts. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57(5):471–4.
Kind P. The EuroQol instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC. Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;54:1169–75.
Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7007–11.
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. 2012.
Asaoka R, Garway-Heath DF, Wang YX, Russell RA, Crabb DP. The precision of 5 year forecasts of the visual field index (VFI) using series of monocular and binocular visual fields. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:1335–41.
Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:221–33.
Mills RP, Drance SM. Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:371–8.
Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosaumy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, et al. Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:450–4.
Iester M, Zingirian M. Quality of life in patients with early, moderate and advanced glaucoma. Eye. 2002;16:44–9.
Petre KL, Hazel CA, Fine EM, Rubin GS. Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:34–9.
Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision. Vision Res. 1985;25:239–52.
Rubin GS, Turano KA. Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vision Res. 1994;34:1723–33.
Sumi I, Shirato S, Matsumoto S, Araie M. The relationship between visual disability and visual field in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:332–9.
Chan EW, Chiang PPC, Wong TY, Saw SM, Loon SC, Aung T, et al. Impact of glaucoma severity and laterality on vision-specific functioning: the Singapore Malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:1169–75.
Saunders LJ, Russell RA, Crabb DP. Practical landmarks for visual field disability in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1185–9.
Glen FC, Crabb DP, Smith ND, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF. Do patients with glaucoma have difficulty recognising faces? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:3629–37.
Esterman B. Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:1226–34.
Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Miller R. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1059–67.
Owen VMF, Crabb DP, White ET, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Glaucoma and fitness to drive: using binocular visual fields to predict a milestone to blindness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2449–55.
Kotecha A, O’Leary N, Melmoth D, Grant S, Crabb DP. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:203–13.
Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosaumy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1236–41.
Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:343–53.
Artes PH, O’Leary N, Hutchison DM, Heckler L, Sharpe GP, Nicolela MT, et al. Properties of the statpac visual field index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4030–8.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Fiona Glen for data collection, Ryo Asaoka for help with patient recruitment and Nicholas Smith for extensive technical help with the experiment. This study was conducted as part of a programme of work funded by an unrestricted grant from the Merck Investigator-Initiated Studies Programme.
Conflicts of interest
R. Burton, None; L. J. Saunders, None; D. P. Crabb, None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, R., Saunders, L.J. & Crabb, D.P. Areas of the visual field important during reading in patients with glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 59, 94–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0359-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0359-8