Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychological Altruism Vs. Biological Altruism: Narrowing The Gap With The Baldwin Effect

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper defends the position that the supposed gap between biological altruism and psychological altruism is not nearly as wide as some scholars (e.g., Elliott Sober) insist. Crucial to this defense is the use of James Mark Baldwin's concepts of “organic selection”and “social heredity” to assist in revealing that the gap between biological and psychological altruism is more of a small lacuna. Specifically, this paper argues that ontogenetic behavioral adjustments, which are crucial to individual survival and reproduction, are also crucial to species survival. In particular, it is argued that human psychological altruism is produced and maintained by various sorts of mimicry and self-reflection in the aid of both individual and species survival. The upshot of this analysis is that it is possible to offer an account of psychological altruism that is closelytethered to biological altruism without reducing entirely the former to thelatter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ananth, M. (2001). Critical review of Dan Sperber's explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31: 563–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ananthakrishnan, P.V. (1970). Consumer aspects of the ecosystems. In: K. C. Misra et al., Ecology (Study of Ecosystem), 241-88. A. H. Wheeler & Co., Allahabad.

  • Aunger, R. (2000). Darwinizing Culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J.M. (1894). Imitation: a chapter in the natural history of consciousness. Mind 3: 26–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J.M. (1896). A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist 30: 441–451, 536–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J.M. (1980). Darwin and the Humanities. AMS Press, New York. (Originally published: 1909. Baltimore, Review)

  • Barkow, J.H. (1989). Darwin, Sex, and Status. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belew, R.K. and M. Mitchell (1996). Adaptive Individuals in Evolving Populations: Models and Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1982). A fresh outlook on cultural selection. American Anthropologist 84: 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1996). Emergency decisions, cultural selection mechanics, and group selection. Current Anthropology 37: 763–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (2004). Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology 13: 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., and Richerson, P. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 3531–3535.

  • Bradie, M. (1994). The Secret Chain. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Mendozzi, P., and Piazza, A. (1994). The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Colosimo, P.F. et al. (2004). The genetic architecture of parallel armor plate reduction in threespine sticklebacks. PLoS Biology 2: 0635–0641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotions in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1882). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (2nd. ed., rev. and augm.). John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C (1996). 1842 sketch and 1844 essay. In: T. F. Glick and D. Kohn (eds), On Evolution. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

  • Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. (rev. ed.) Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T., et al. (1994). Ecology and genetics of phenotypic plasticity: A comparison of two sticklebacks. Evolution 48: 1723–1734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (1997). The Symbolic Species. W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (2003). The Baldwin effect: A crane, not a skyhook. In: D. J. Depew and B. H. Weber (eds), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered, 69-79. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D.J. (2003). Baldwin and his many effects. In: D. J. Depew and B. H. Weber (eds), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered, 4–31. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D.J. and Weber, B.H. (1995). Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D.J. (2003). Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S.M. (2003). Baldwin effects and the expansion of the explanatory repertoire in evolutionary biology. In: D. J. Depew and B. H. Weber (eds), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered, 33–351. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, K.L. (2004). Development and the Baldwin effect. Artificial Life 10: 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. and Parsons, P.A. (1976). The Genetics of Behavior. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and Gaechter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415: 137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.W. and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. (1989). On the theory of evolution under genetic and cultural transmission with application to lactose absorption problem. In: M. W. Feldman (ed.), Mathematical Evolutionary Theory, 145–173. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.W., et al. (1996). Individual versus social learning: Evolutionary analysis in a fluctuating environment. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 96–05–031.

  • Galef, B.G. (1987). Evolution and learning before Thorndike: A forgotten epoch in the history of behavioral research. In: R. C. Bolles and M. D. Beecher (eds): Evolution and Learning, 39–58. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

  • Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology 206: 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H., Smith, E.A., and Bowles, S. (2001). Costly signaling and cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 213: 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Between Baldwin skepticism and Baldwin boosterism. In: D. J. Depew and B. H. Weber (eds), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered, 53–67. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. (1997). What Emotions Really Are. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. and Gray, R.D. (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. and Sterelny, K. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetic evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1975). Innate social aptitudes of man: An approach from evolutionary genetics. In: R. Rox, ed. Biosocial Anthropology, pp. 133–155. Malaby Pess, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P. (2003) Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G.A., Tanner, J.M., Pilbeam, D.R., and Baker, P.T. (1988). Human Biology: An Introduction to Human Evolution, Variation, Growth, and Adaptability. (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. and Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors—weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology 208: 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1985). Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimar, O. and Hammerstein, P. (2001). Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 268: 2495–2501.

  • Lumsden, C.J. and Wilson, E.O. (1981). Genes, Mind and Culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C.J. and Wilson, E.O. (1985). The relation between biological and cultural evolution. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 8: 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1964). Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201: 1145–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C.L. (1896). Habit and Instinct. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1978). Ethics as an autonomous theoretical subject. In: G. S. Stent (ed.), Morality as a Biological Phenomenon, 198–205. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R.M. (2001). Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, M.A. and Sigmund, K. (1998). The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 194: 561–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, J.F., Laland, K.N., and Feldman, N.W. (2003). Niche Construction : The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. (2001). Why won't the group selection controversy go away? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E.J., Walker, J., and Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86: 404–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. (1985). The Ontogeny of Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M and Mace, R. (2004). The cultural wealth of nations. Nature 428: 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panchanathan, K. and Boyd, R. (2003). A tale of two defectors: The importance of standing for the evolution of reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 224: 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (2004). Social learning and the Baldwin effect. Paper read at Innateness and the Structure of the Mind, July 2003, Sheffield; available at: www.kcl.ac.uk/ip/davidpapineau/ Staff/Papineau/OnlinePapers/SocLearnBald.htm

  • Queller, D.C. (1992). Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. American Naturalist 139: 540–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. (2003). The Emerging Mind. Profile Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relethford, J.H. (1997). Fundamentals of Biological Anthropology (2nd ed.). Mayfield Publishing Company, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.J. (1987). Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1996). Evolution (2nd ed.). Blackwell Science, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1998). Introduction to part VII. In: D. L. Hull and M. Ruse (eds), The Philosophy of Biology, 445–447. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. and Wilson, E.O. (1986). Moral philosophy as applied science. Philosophy 61: 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, C.D. and Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth, S.J. (1998). Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G. (1953). The Baldwin effect. Evolution 7: 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (1996). Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.A. and Biege-Bird, R.L. (2000). Turtle hunting and tombstone opening: Public generosity as costly signaling. Evolution and Human Behavior 21: 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1988). What is evolutionary altruism? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14: 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1993a). Evolutionary altruism, psychological egoism, and morality: disentangling the phenotypes. In: M.N. Nitecki and D.V. Nitecki (eds), Evolutionary Ethics, 199–216. SUNY Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1993b). Philosophy of Biology. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1994). From a Biological Point of View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S. (1994). Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17: 585–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1986). The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. (1942). Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Nature 150: 563–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. (1952). Selection of the genetic basis for an acquired character. Nature 169: 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. (1953a). Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7: 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. (1953b). The Baldwin effect, genetic assimilation, and homeostasis. Evolution 7: 386–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H. (1961) Genetic assimilation. Advanced Genetics 10: 257–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M.J. (1980). Kin selection: Its components. Science 210: 665–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M.J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. and Dugatkin, L. (1992). Altruism: contemporary debates. In E. F. Keller and E. A. Lloyd (eds), Key Words in Evolutionary Biology, 29–33. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V.C. (1962). Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History, Philosophy and Political Science, Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Mahesh Ananth

  2. 9501 S. King Drive, Chicago, Illinois, 60628

    Mahesh Ananth

Authors
  1. Mahesh Ananth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahesh Ananth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ananth, M. Psychological Altruism Vs. Biological Altruism: Narrowing The Gap With The Baldwin Effect. Acta Biotheor 53, 217–239 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-2530-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-2530-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation