Skip to main content
Log in

The Concept of Animal Welfare at the Interface between Producers and Scientists: The Example of Organic Pig Farming

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In organic farming animal welfare is one important aspect included in the internationally agreed organic principles of health, ecology, fairness and care (IFOAM 2006), reflecting expectation of consumers and farmers. The definition of organic animal welfare includes—besides traditional terms of animal welfare—‘regeneration’ and ‘naturalness’. Organic animal welfare assessment needs to reflect this and use complex parameters, include natural behaviour and a systemic view. Furthermore, various parties with seemingly conflicting interests are involved, causing ethical dilemmas, such as the use of nose rings for outdoor sows (impaired animal welfare vs. destruction of humus). Solutions can only be found when foundational concepts are translated and applied to practical situations. On-farm animal welfare assessment and implementation of improvement strategies are increasingly relevant scientific areas. They combine on-farm welfare assessment, identification of key problem areas and connected risk factors. Constant communication between all parties is crucial for success. Animal health and welfare planning is one application of this approach, which was carried out on Austrian organic pig farms as well as organic dairy farms in seven European countries. The projects included welfare assessment, feedback and benchmarking as a tool for communication between farmers, advisors and scientists. Finally goals were set by the farmer and improvement strategies applicable to organic farming were implemented. This included prevention of disease by management strategies instead of routine treatment with pharmaceutical products. It appeared that next to problem structuring, multidisciplinary problem solving demands good communications skills to relate animal welfare science to value reflections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alrøe HF, Schmid O, Padel S (2005) Ethical principles and the revision of organic rules. The Org Stand 51:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • American Humane Association (2009) American Humane® Certified Documents. http://documents.americanhumanecertified.net/ahdocs-pa.aspx. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • Atkinson C, Neale M (2007) Animal health planning and animal health plans—concepts, principles and practicalities. In: Proceedings of the 1st CORE organic ANIPLAN workshop, Hellevad/Denmark, 9–12 October 2007: 19–25. http://aniplan.coreportal.org/gfx/Aniplan_samlet_low.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • Baars T (1999) Review of animal health and welfare. In: Isart J, Llerena JJ (eds) Organic farming research in the EU, towards 21st century. ENOF White Book, Barcelona, pp 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth K, Brinkmann J (2009) Interdisziplinär betrachtet: Gesundheit- und Leistungsfähigkeit von Milchkühen im Ökologischen Landbau. In: Werte–Wege–Wirkungen: Biolandbau im Spannungsfeld zwischen Ernährungssicherung, Markt und Klimawandel, Proceedings of the 10. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau, ETH Zürich, 11–13 February 2009. http://orgprints.org/view/projects/int_conf_2009_wita.html. Accessed 4 Apr 2011

  • Bennedsgaard TW, Klaas IC, Vaarst M (2010) Reducing use of antimicrobials–Experiences from an intervention study in organic dairy herds in Denmark. Livest Sci 131:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann J, March S (2011) Tiergesundheit in der ökologischen Milchviehhaltung—Status quo sowie (Weiter-) Entwicklung, Anwendung und Beurteilung eines präventiven Konzeptes zur Herdengesundheitsplanung. Dissertation, Georg-August-University Göttingen

  • Broom DM (1991) Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci 69:4167–4175

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2007) Council Regulation on Organic Livestock Production, 834/2007. Committee of the European Communities, Brussels/Belgium. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:189:0001:0023:EN:PDF. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • CEC (2008) COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 889/2008 Committee of the European Communities, Brussels/Belgium. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:250:0001:0084:EN:PDF. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • Dippel S, Dolezal M, Brenninkmeyer C, Brinkmann J, March S, Knierim U, Winckler C (2009) Risk factors for lameness in freestall-housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems, and countries. J Dairy Sci 92:5476–5486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH (1993) Welfare is to do with what animals feel. J Agric Environ Ethics 6(Suppl 2):8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratzer E (2011) Animal health and welfare planning in Austrian organic dairy farming. Dissertation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria

  • Gray D, Hovi M (2001) Animal health plans for organic farms: the UK experience. In: Proceedings of the 5th NAHWOA workshop, Roedding/Denmark, 11–13 November 2001. http://www.veeru.rdg.ac.uk/organic/proc/FinalProceedingsDenmark.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • Halberg N, Hermansen JE, Kristensen IS, Eriksen J, Tvedegaard N, Petersen BM (2010) Impact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollution. Agron Sustain Dev 30:721–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM (2006) The IFOAM norms for organic production and processing, Version 2005. Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Germany. http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/standards/norms/norm_documents_library/Norms_EN G_V4_20090113.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2010

  • Ivemeyer S, Walkenhorst M, Heil F, Notz C, Maeschli A, Butler G, Klocke P (2009) Management factors affecting udder health and effects of a one year extension program in organic dairy herds. Animal 3:1596–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach KA, Whay HR, Maggs CM, Barker ZE, Barker ZE, Paul ES, Bell AK, Main DCJ (2010) Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Res Vet Sci 89:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeb C, Whay HR, Hovi M, Main DCJ (2004) Incorporation of existing animal welfare assessment techniques into organic certification and farming. Final Report of DEFRA Project OF 0314, DEFRA, UK. http://orgprints.org/6613/1/OF0314_2128_FRP.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • Leeb C, Bernardi F, Winckler C (2010) Einführung und Monitoring von ‘BetriebsEntwicklungsPlänen (BEP) Tiergesundheit und Wohlbefinden’ in österreichischen Bioschweinebetrieben. Final Report Project 100188. https://www.dafne.at/prod/dafne_plus_common/attachment_download/27d23397751605c2f6507e4bef5f327a/Endbericht_BEP_final.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • Lund V (1996) Etik och ekonomi i ekologisk djurhållning. [Ethics and economy in organic farming.] Ekologiskt lantbruk 20, Swedish University of Agriculture, 102–107

  • Lund V (2002) Ethics and animal welfare in organic animal husbandry—an interdisciplinary approach. Dissertation. University of Uppsala

  • Lund V, Algers B (2003) Research on animal health and welfare in organic farming—a literature review. Livest Prod Sci 80:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund V, Röcklingsberg H (2001) Outlining a conception of animal welfare for organic farming systems. J Agric Environ Ethics 14:391–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main DCJ, Whay HR, Green LE, Webster AJF (2003) Effect of the RSPCA Freedom Food scheme on the welfare of dairy cattle. Vet Rec 153:227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main DCJ, Whay HR, Leeb C, Webster AJF (2007) Formal animal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes. Anim Welfare 16:233–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale M (2008) BWAP–On farm auditing course for animal welfare approved program and whole foods, North Carolina, USA pers. comm

  • Röcklinsberg H, Lund V (2000) Is well-being all that matters in animal ethics? Some comments on welfare and dignity in relation to animal ethics within organic farming. In: Robinson P (ed) EurSafe 2000, Preprints Copenhagen, 24–26 August. Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 227–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin BE (1993) Animal welfare, science and value. J Agric Environ Ethics 6(Suppl 2):44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield PL (1992) The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 35(11):1343–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RSPCA (2008) Welfare standards for pigs. RSPCA, Horsham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley R (2000) Planning health care on dairy farms. In Pract 22:405–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future; transmitted to the general assembly as an annex to document A/42/427–Development and international co-operation: environment; our common future, chapter 2: towards sustainable development; paragraph 1’’. United Nations General Assembly. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm. Accessed 5 Apr 2011

  • Vaarst M, Nissen TB, Østergaard S, Klaas IC, Bennedsgaard TW, Christensen J (2007) Danish stable schools for experiential common learning in groups of organic dairy farmers. J Dairy Sci 90:2543–2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaarst M, Gratzer E, Walkenhorst M, Ivemeyer S, Brinkmann J, March S, Whistance LK, Smolders G, Stöger E, Huber J, Leeb C, Roderick S, Winckler C, Henriksen BIF, Nicholas P, Hansen B, Mejdell CM (2010) Farmer groups for animal health and welfare planning in European organic dairy herds. In: Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium. Vienna, Austria, July 4–7, pp 683–691

  • Welfare Quality® (2009) Welfare quality assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare quality consortium, Lelystad/Netherlands; ISBN/EAN 978-90-78240-04-4

  • Wemelsfelder F, Hunter TEA, Mendl MT, Lawrence AB (2001) Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach. Anim Behav 62(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whay HR (2007) The journey to animal welfare improvement. Anim Welfare 16:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Whay HR, Main DCJ (2010) Improving animal welfare: practical approaches for achieving change. In: Improving animal welfare: a practical approach. CAB International, Wallingford/United Kingdom, 227–251

  • Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF (2002) Farmer perception of lameness prevalence. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on lameness in ruminants. Orlando, USA, January 9–13, pp 355–358

  • Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF (2003) Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigations of farm records. Vet Rec 153:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Leeb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leeb, C. The Concept of Animal Welfare at the Interface between Producers and Scientists: The Example of Organic Pig Farming. Acta Biotheor 59, 173–183 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9135-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9135-z

Keywords

Navigation