Abstract
An undersupply of generalists doctors in rural communities globally led to widening participation (WP) initiatives to increase the proportion of rural origin medical students. In 2002 the Australian Government mandated that 25% of commencing Australian medical students be of rural origin. Meeting this target has largely been achieved through reduced standards of entry for rural relative to urban applicants. This initiative is based on the assumption that rural origin students will succeed during training, and return to practice in rural locations. One aim of this study was to determine the relationships between student geographical origin (rural or urban), selection scores, and future practice intentions of medical students at course entry and course exit. Two multicentre databases containing selection and future practice preferences (location and specialisation) were combined (5862), representing 54% of undergraduate medical students commencing from 2006 to 2013 across nine Australian medical schools. A second aim was to determine course performance of rural origin students selected on lower scores than their urban peers. Selection and course performance data for rural (461) and urban (1431) origin students commencing 2006–2014 from one medical school was used. For Aim 1, a third (33.7%) of rural origin students indicated a preference for future rural practice at course exit, and even fewer (6.7%) urban origin students made this preference. Results from logistic regression analyses showed significant independent predictors were rural origin (OR 4.0), lower Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank (ATAR) (OR 2.1), or lower Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admissions Test Section 3 (non-verbal reasoning) (OR 1.3). Less than a fifth (17.6%) of rural origin students indicated a preference for future generalist practice at course exit. Significant predictors were female gender (OR 1.7) or lower ATAR (OR 1.2), but not rural origin. Fewer (10.5%) urban origin students indicated a preference for generalist practice at course exit. For Aim 2, results of Mann–Whitney U tests confirmed that slightly reducing selection scores does not result in increased failure, or meaningfully impaired performance during training relative to urban origin students. Our multicentre analysis supports success of the rural origin WP pathway to increase rural student participation in medical training. However, our findings confirm that current selection initiatives are insufficient to address the continuing problem of doctor maldistribution in Australia. We argue for further reform to current medical student selection, which remains largely determined by academic meritocracy. Our findings have relevance to the selection of students into health professions globally.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The research on which the following section of the report is based used data provided by the Medical Schools Outcomes Database and Longitudinal Tracking (MSOD) Project, Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand Inc. We are grateful to the medical schools, medical students, graduates and doctors who participated. The MSOD project was possible due to funding made available by Health Workforce Australia (2011 onwards) and The Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing (2004–2011).
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Australian social trends, 2008. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia. Retrieved April 26, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Chapter3002008.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Australian social trends, 2013: Doctors and nurses. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia. Retrieved April 26, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features20April+2013#p2.
Boelen, C. (1999). Adapting health care institutions and medical schools to societies’ needs. Academic Medicine, 74, S11–S20.
Chan, Z. C. Y. (2015). Policy matters: medical education for whom? Are locally or globally trained doctors best? Medical Education, 49, 7–9. doi:10.1111/medu.12614.
Christensen, C. M., Grossman, J. H., & Hwang, J. (2009). The innovator’s prescription: A disruptive solution for health care. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clark, T. R., Freedman, S. B., Croft, A. J., Dalton, H. E., Luscombe, G. M., Brown, A. M., et al. (2013). Medical graduates becoming rural doctors: Rural background versus extended rural placement. Medical Journal of Australia, 199, 779–782.
Cleland, J. A., Nicholson, S., Kelly, N., & Moffat, M. (2015). Taking context seriously: Explaining widening access policy enactments in UK Medical Schools. Medical Education, 49, 25–35.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2012). The factors affecting the supply of health services and medical professionals in rural areas. Retrieved June 22, 2015, from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/2010-13/rurhlth/report/index.
de Visser, M., Fluit, C., Fransen, J., Latijnhouwers, M., Cohen-Schotanus, J., & Laan, R. (2016). The effect of curriculum sample selection for medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9681-x.
De Vries, E., & Reid, S. (2003). Do South African medical students of rural origin return to rural practice? South African Medical Journal, 93, 789–793.
Dowell, J., Norbury, M., Steven, K., & Guthrie, B. (2015). Widening access to medicine may improve general practitioner recruitment in deprived and rural communities: Survey of GP origins and current place of work Career choice, professional education and development. BMC Medical Education,. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0445-8.
Easterbrook, M., Godwin, M., Wilson, R., Hodgetts, G., Brown, G., Pong, R., et al. (2011). Rural background and clinical rural rotations during medical training: Effect on practice location. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 160, 1159–1163.
Eley, D., & Young, L. (2009). Exploring the temperament and character traits of rural and urban doctors. The Journal of Rural Health, 31, e79–e84. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00197.x.
Eva, K. W. (2015). Moving beyond childish notions of fair and equitable. Medical Education, 49(1), 1–3. doi:10.1111/medu.12640.
Gerber, J. P., & Landau, L. I. (2010). Driving change in rural workforce planning: The Medical School Outcome Database. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 16, 36–39.
Gorman, D. (2015). Developing health care workforces for uncertain futures. Academic Medicine, 90, 400–403.
Gorman, D. F., Scott, P. J., & Poole, P. (2007). On the maldistribution of the medical workforce. Internal Medicine Journal, 37, 669–671.
Greer, T., Kost, A., Evans, D. V., Norris, T., Erickson, J., McCarthy, J., et al. (2016). The WWAMI Targeted Rural Underserved Track (TRUST) program: An innovative response to rural physician workforce shortages. Academic Medicine, 91(1), 65–69. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000807.
Hay, M., Warnecke, E., Hu, W., Griffin, B., Lay, D., Lichtwark, I., Tran, S., & Mercer, A. (2015, April). The predictive validity of the UMAT: A multi-institutional study. Paper presented at the Australasian student selection for the health professions conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Hayes, R. B., Lockhart, K. R., Teo, E., Smith, J., & Waynforth, D. (2015). Full medical program fees and medical career intention. Medical Journal of Australia, 202, 46–50.
Jones, M. P., Bushnell, J. A., & Humphreys, J. S. (2014). Are rural placements positively associated with rural intentions in medical graduates? Medical Education, 48, 405–416.
Jones, M. P., Humphreys, J. S., & Prideaux, D. (2009). Predicting medial students’ intentions to take up rural practice after graduation. Medical Education, 43, 1001–1009.
Larkins, S., Michielsen, K., Iputo, J., Elsanousi, S., Mammen, M., Graves, L., et al. (2015). Impact of selection strategies on representation of underserved populations and intention to practice: International findings. Medical Education, 49, 60–72.
Laven, G., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Rural doctors and rural backgrounds: How strong is the evidence? A systematic literature review. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 11, 277–284.
Lievens, F. (2015). Diversity in medical school admission: Insights from personnel recruitment and selection. Medical Education, 49, 11–14.
McGrail, M. R., Humphreys, J. S., & Joyce, C. M. (2011). Nature of association between rural background and practice location: A comparison of general practitioners and specialists. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 1–8. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-63.
Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand. (2015). MSOD and data linkage. Retrieved from May 4, 2015, from http://www.medicaldeans.org.au/projects-activities/msodproject/.
Medical Training Review Panel (MTRP) 18th Report. (2015). Australian Government Department of Health. Commonwealth of Australia. ISBN (print): 978-1-76007-162-2. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/work-pubs-mtrp-18.
Mercer, A., Hay, M., Simpson, K., Canny, B., Hodgson, W., & Puddey, I. (2015, April). Are selection scores and course outcomes related for undergraduate medical students? Paper presented at the Australasian student selection for the health professions conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Mercer, A., & Puddey, I. B. (2011). Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: A prospective study. Medical Teacher, 33, 997–1004.
Moineau, G. (2015). On social accountability: When will we walk the talk? Medical Education, 49, 9–11.
Owen, J. A., Conaway, M. R., Bailey, B. A., & Hayden, G. F. (2007). Predicting rural practice using different definitions to classify medical school applicants as having a rural upbringing. Journal of Rural Health, 23, 133–140.
Patterson, F., Prescott-Clements, L., Zibarras, L., Edwards, H., Kerrin, M., & Cousans, F. (2015). Recruiting for values in healthcare: A preliminary review of the evidence. Advances in Health Science Education,. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9579-4.
Playford, D. E., Evans, S. F., Atkinson, D. N., Auret, K. A., & Riley, G. J. (2014). Impact of the Rural Clinical School of Western Australia on work location of medical graduates. Medical Journal of Australia, 200, 104–107.
Poole, P., & Shulruf, B. (2013). Shaping the future medical workforce: Take care with selection tools. Journal of Primary Health Care, 5, 269–275.
Poole, P., Shulruf, B., Rudland, J., & Wilkinson, T. (2012). Comparison of UMAT scores and GPA in prediction of performance in medical school: A national study. Medical Education, 46, 163–171.
Powis, D. (2014). Selecting medical students: An unresolved challenge. Medical Teacher, 37, 252–260.
Puddey, I. B., Mercer, A., Playford, D. E., Pougnault, S., & Riley, G. J. (2014). Medical student selection criteria as predictors of intended rural practice following graduation. BMC Medical Education, 14, 1–12. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-218.
Puddey, I. B., Mercer, A., Playford, D. E., & Riley, G. J. (2015). Medical student selection criteria and socio-demographic factors as predictors of ultimately working rurally after graduation. BMC Medical Education, 15, 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0359-5.
Rabinowitz, H. K., Diamond, J. J., Markham, F. W., & Santana, A. J. (2012). The relationship between entering medical students’ backgrounds and career plans and their rural practice outcomes three decades later. Academic Medicine, 87(4), 493–497. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182488c06.
Razack, S., Hodges, B., Steinert, Y., & Maguire, M. (2015). Seeking inclusion in an exclusive process: Discourse of medical schools student selection. Medical Education, 49, 36–47.
Roseamelia, C., Greenwald, J. L., Bush, T., Pratte, M., Wilcox, J., & Morley, C. P. (2014). A qualitative study of medical students in a rural track: Views on eventual rural practice. Family Medicine, 46(4), 259–266. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84898890472&partnerID=40&md5=95436d3c8ad5b921658560e7d2b2eb5b.
Sandhu, G. (2015). When I say… social accountability in medical education. Medical Education, 49(1), 23–24.
Shulruf, B., Poole, P., Wang, G., Rudland, J., & Wilkinson, T. (2012). How well do selection tools predict performance later in a medical programme? Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 17, 615–626.
Simpson, P. L., Scicluna, H. A., Jones, P. D., Cole, A. M., O’Sullivan, A. J., Harris, P. G., et al. (2014). Predictive validity of a new integrated selection process for medical school admission. BMC Medical Education, 14, 1–10.
Skochelak, S. E., & Stack, S. J. (2016). Creating the medical schools of the future. Academic Medicine,. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001160.
Southgate, E., Kelly, B. J., & Symonds, I. M. (2015). Disadvantage and the ‘capacity to aspire’ to medical school. Medical Education, 49, 73–83.
Wade, M. E., Brokaw, J. J., Zollinger, T. W., Wilson, J. S., Springer, J. R., Deal, W. W., et al. (2007). Influence of hometown on family physicians’ choice to practice in rural settings. Family Medicine, 39, 248–254.
Wendling, A. L., Phillips, J., Short, W., Fahey, C., Mavis, B. (2016). Thirty years training rural physicians: outcomes from the michigan state university college of human medicine rural physician program. Academic Medicine, 91(1), 113–119. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000885.
Wilkinson, D., Zhang, J., & Parker, M. (2011). Predictive validity of the Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admissions Test for medical students’ academic performance. Medical Journal of Australia, 194, 341–344.
Wilson, I. G., Roberts, C., Flynn, E. M., & Griffin, B. (2012). Only the best: Medical student selection in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 196, 377–388.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the UMAT Consortium for funding the UMAT Multicentre Predictive Validity Study.
Author’s contributions
MH and AM are chief investigators of the UMAT Multicentre Predictive Validity Study. MH wrote the first draft of the paper, and all listed authors contributed to subsequent drafts. ST and IL manage the UMAT study database and conducted the statistical analysis. WH, HTA, EA, and DG made significant contributions to the broader policy issues addressed in the discussion, and which motivated and framed this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hay, M., Mercer, A.M., Lichtwark, I. et al. Selecting for a sustainable workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of rural communities in Australia. Adv in Health Sci Educ 22, 533–551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9727-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9727-0