Abstract
Gender mainstreaming has been prioritised within the national agricultural policies of many countries, including Nepal. Yet gender mainstreaming at the national policy level does not always work to effect change when policies are implemented at the local scale. In less-developed nations such as Nepal, it is rare to find a critical analysis of the mainstreaming process and its successes or failures. This paper employs a critical gender analysis approach to examine the gender mainstreaming efforts in Nepal as they move from agricultural policies to practices. The research involved a structured review of 10 key national agricultural policy documents, 14 key informant interviews, and two focus group discussions with female and male smallholder farmers. Results suggest that gender mainstreaming in national agricultural policy and practice has largely failed. The creation of the Gender Equity and Social Inclusion (GESI) section within the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development is paradoxical to gender-responsive agricultural innovation because it has received limited human and financial resources with an expectation for women to manage this policy development in informal and largely unrecognized ways. At the regional and local levels, implementation of fundamental gender equity and social inclusion procedures—such as gender-responsive planning and budgeting—has become staff responsibility without requisite formal training, gender sensitization, and follow-up. In Nepal, women as smallholder farmers or agricultural labourers are recognized as a vulnerable group in need of social protection, but the welfare approach to gender mainstreaming has achieved little in terms of gender equity, social inclusion, and agricultural sustainability. This paper concludes that what is generally missing is a systemic transformation of gender roles and relations in agriculture, with policies that would support rural women's empowerment through the provision of economic and political rights and entitlement to productive resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- EDI:
-
Equity, diversity and inclusion
- FPE:
-
Feminist political ecology
- GESI:
-
Gender equity and social inclusion
- GAD:
-
Gender and development
- GTA:
-
Gender transformative approach
- MoALD:
-
Ministry of agriculture and livestock development
- NARC:
-
National agriculture research council
- WID:
-
Women in development
- WAD:
-
Women and development
References
Acosta, M., Ampaire, E., Kigonya, R., Kyomugisha, S., & Jassogne, L. 2016. Towards gender responsive policy formulation and budgeting in the agricultural sector: Opportunities and challenges in Uganda. CCAFS Info Note. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/77770. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
Acosta, M., S. van Bommel, M. van Wessel, E.L. Ampaire, L. Jassogne, and P.H. Feindt. 2019. Discursive translations of gender mainstreaming norms: The case of agricultural and climate change policies in Uganda. Women’s Studies International Forum 74: 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.02.010.
ADB. 2010. Overview of gender equality and social inclusion in Nepal. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/32237/cga-nep-2010.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
Agarwal, B. 2001. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 29 (12): 1623–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3.
Ampaire, E.L., M. Acosta, S. Huyer, R. Kigonya, P. Muchunguzi, R. Muna, and L. Jassogne. 2020. Gender in climate change, agriculture, and natural resource policies: Insights from East Africa. Climatic Change 158 (1): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02447-0.
Arora-Jonsson, S., and B.B. Sijapati. 2018. Disciplining gender in environmental organizations: The texts and practices of gender mainstreaming. Gender, Work and Organization 25 (3): 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12195.
Badstue, L., Kantor, P., Prain, G., Ashby, J., & Petesch, P. 2014. Innovation and development through transformation of gender norms in agriculture and natural resource management—a global comparative research initiative: Concept note. Retrieved from https://gender.cgiar.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/CN-Global-Study-GenderNormsAgency_modified-Jan-2015.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2019.
Beijing Platform for Action. 1995. Beijing declaration and platform for action. Fourth world conference on Women. Beijing, China, 4–15 September 1995. Retrieved on 13 Aug 2019. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/document/1995-beijing-platform-of-action/.
Bhattarai, K. D. 2019. The woeful presence of Nepali women in politics and government. The Annapurna P Retrieved from The Annapurna Post: https://theannapurnaexpress.com/news/the-woeful-presence-of-nepali-women-in-politics-and-government-1265. Accessed 7 Jan 2020.
Bhattarai, K., and L. Pant. 2013. Patriarchal bargains in protected spaces : A new strategy for agricultural and rural development innovation in the western hills of Nepal. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 34 (4): 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2013.830967.
Boserup, E. 1970. Women’s role in economic development, 283. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Braidotti, R., E. Charkiewicz, S. Hausler, and S. Wieringa. 1994. Women, the environment and sustainable development: Towards a theoretical synthesis. London: Zed Books.
Buchan, R., D.S. Cloutier, and A. Friedman. 2018. Transformative incrementalism: Planning for transformative change in local food systems. Progress in Planning 134 (Nov): 100424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.07.002.
Caglar, G. 2013. Gender Mainstreaming. Politics & Gender 9 (3): 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000214.
Cerise, S., & Francavilla, F. 2012. Tackling the root causes of gender inequalities in the post-2015 development agenda. Global Thematic Consultation on Addressing Inequalities. The Heart of the Post-2015 Development Agenda and the Future we want for All. (Vol. Paris). Paris. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271826265_Tackling_the_root_causes_of_gender_inequality. Accessed 15 June 2019.
Choudhury, A., Kantor, P., & Morgan, M. 2014. Gender transformative approaches in nutrition and aquatic agricultural interventions. In: Workshop on “Inspiring Change: Institutionalizing Gender in Nutrition and Agriculture Interventions” 9 March 2014. World Fish. https://www.worldfishcenter.org/content/gender-transformative-approaches-nutrition-and-aquatic-agricultural-interventions-afrina. Accessed 15 June 2019.
Cornwall, A., E. Harrison, and A. Whitehead. 2007. Gender myths and feminist fables: The struggle for interpretive power in gender and development. Development and Change 38 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00400.x.
Cornwall, A., and A.-M. Rivas. 2015. From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly 36 (2): 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1013341.
Devkota, R., Khadka, K., Gartaula, H., Shrestha, A., & Karki, S. 2016. Gender and labour efficiency in finger millet production in Nepal. In: A. Njuki, Jemimah; Parkins, John R., Kaler (Ed.) Transforming Gender and Food Security in the Global South, 1st edn, Vol. 2, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp. 76–95
Devkota, R., L.P. Pant, H.N. Gartaula, K. Patel, D. Gauchan, H. Hambly-Odame, B. Thapa, and M.N. Raizada. 2020. Responsible agricultural mechanization innovation for the sustainable development of Nepal’s hillside farming system. Sustainability 12 (1): 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010374.
Elmhirst, R. 2015. Feminist political ecology. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383117-16.
Elson, D., & Pearson, R. 1984. The subordination of women and the internationalization of factory production. Retrieved on 15 Aug 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Subordination-Of-Women-And-The-Of-Factory-Elson-Pearson/b8f62a50883b12064263a5fa6157bcf9d3485dff.
FAO. 2009. Bridging the gap: FAO’s programme for gender equality in agriculture and rural development. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i1243e.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2019.
FAO. 2019. Country gender assessment of agriculture and the rural sector in Nepal. Kathmandu: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/CA3128EN/ca3128en.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2020.
Fredman, S., J. Kuosmanen, and M. Campbell. 2016. Transformative equality: Making the sustainable development goals work for women. Ethics & International Affairs 30 (02): 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941600006X.
Ghale, Y. 2008. Nepal scoping study on women’s leadership in the agriculture sector in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal. http://asia.procasur.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/4.-IFAD-Pilot-Programme-Nepal-scoping-study-09-081.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2018.
Ghale, Y., Pyakuryal, K. N., Devkota, D., Pant, K. P., & Timsina, N. P. 2018. Gender dimensions of food security, the right to food and food sovereignty in Nepal. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 19(4), 15–31. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol19/iss4/3/. Accessed 7 Jan 2020.
Gonda, N. 2019. Re-politicizing the gender and climate change debate: The potential of feminist political ecology to engage with power in action in adaptation policies and projects in Nicaragua. Geoforum 106: 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.07.020.
Gumucio, T., and M. Tafur Rueda. 2015. Influencing gender-inclusive climate change policies in Latin America. Journal of Gender Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender) 1 (2): 42–61. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.246049.
Hambly Odame, H. 2002. Men in women’s groups: A gender and agency analysis in local institutions. In Masculinities matter!: Men, gender and development—google books, ed. F. Cleaver, 138–163. London: Zed Books.
Harcourt, W. 2017. Gender and sustainable livelihoods: Linking gendered experiences of environment, community and self. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (4): 1007–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9757-5.
Hillenbrand, E., Karim, N., Mohanraj, P., & Wu, D. 2015. Measuring gender-transformative change: A review of literature and promising practices (Working Papers No. 40647). http://pubs.iclarm.net/resource_centre/AAS-Working-Paper-Measuring-Gender-Transformative-Change.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2018.
Howland, F., Le Coq, J.-F., & Acosta, M. 2019. Gender integration in agriculture, food Security and climate change policy: A framework proposal. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/99828. Accessed 7 Jan 2020.
Huyer, S. 2016. Closing the gender gap in agriculture. Gender, Technology and Development 20 (2): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852416643872.
Kabeer, N., & Natali, L. 2013. Gender equality and economic growth: Is there a win-win? (IDS Working Paper No. 417). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. http://www.unwomen.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Paid-work-women’s. Accessed 5 June 2018.
Kansanga, M.M., R. Antabe, Y. Sano, S. Mason-Renton, and I. Luginaah. 2019. A feminist political ecology of agricultural mechanization and evolving gendered on-farm labor dynamics in northern Ghana. Gender, Technology and Development 23: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1687799.
Kantor, P., M. Morgan, and A. Choudhury. 2015. Amplifying outcomes by addressing inequality: The role of gender-transformative approaches in agricultural research for development. Gender, Technology and Development 19 (3): 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852415596863.
Kerr, R.B. 2014. Lost and found crops: Agrobiodiversity, indigenous knowledge, and a feminist political ecology of sorghum and finger millet in Northern Malawi. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (3): 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.892346.
Kingiri, A.N. 2013. A review of innovation systems framework as a tool for gendering agricultural innovations: Exploring gender learning and system empowerment. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 19 (5): 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2013.817346.
Krizsan, A., and E. Lombardo. 2013. The quality of gender equality policies: A discursive approach. European Journal of Womens Studies 20 (1): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812456462.
Lamprell, G., D. Greenfield, and J. Braithwaite. 2015. The paradoxes of gender mainstreaming in developing countries: The case of health care in Papua New Guinea. Global Public Health 10 (1): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.95954.1.
Lee, H., & Pollitzer, E. 2016. The role of gender-based innovations for the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Toward 2030: Better science and technology for all (1st ed.). Korea Center for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology (WISET). http://gender-summit.com/images/GS6Docs/SDG_Report_FINAL.Jan13.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2018.
Lombardo, E., P. Meier, and M. Verloo. 2017. Policymaking from a gender+ equality perspective. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 38 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198206.
MoALD. 2014. Agriculture Development Strategy (ADS), 2014. Singhdurbar, Kathmandu, Nepal. http://www.nnfsp.gov.np/PortalContent.aspx?Doctype=Resources&ID=61. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
MoALD. 2017a. Annual progress report on gender equity and social inclusion (in Nepali). Singh Durbar, Kathmandu. http://www.doanepal.gov.np/downloadsdetail/3/2018/44178961/. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
MoALD. 2017b. Selected indicators of gender and social inclusion in agriculture sector and related agricultural programs. Singha Darbar, Kathmandu. https://nepalindata.com/media/resources/bulkuploaded/Gender_and_social_inclusion_in_agriculture_sector_related_agricultural_programs_eng_may_17.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
MoF. 2018. Economic survey 2018/19. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Finance Growth of Export and Import. https://www.mof.gov.np/uploads/document/file/compiled%20economic%20Survey%20english%207-25_20191111101758.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
Moser, C., and A. Moser. 2005. Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: A review of success and limitations in international institutions. Gender and Development 13 (2): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332283.
Nightingale, A.J. 2011. Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42 (2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004.
NPC. 2015. Post disaster needs assessment: Vol. B: Sector reports, Nepal earthquake 2015. Kathmandu. www.npc.gov.np. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. 2019. Combining feminist political ecology and participatory diagramming to study climate information service delivery and knowledge flows among smallholder farmers in northern Ghana. Applied Geography 112: 102079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102079.
Okali, C. 2012. Gender Analysis: Engaging with Rural Development and Agricultural Policy Processes (Future Agriculture No. 026). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08a7fe5274a31e000062a/FAC_Working_Paper_026.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2019.
Pariyar, B., J.C. Lovett, and C. Snell. 2017. Inequality of access in irrigation systems of the mid-hills of Nepal. Area Development and Policy 3 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2017.1353886.
Rai-Paudyal, B., N. Chanana, A. Khatri-Chhetri, L. Sherpa, I. Kadariya, and P. Aggarwal. 2019. Gender integration in climate change and agricultural policies: The case of Nepal. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3: 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00066.
Rocheleau, D.E. 2010. Feminist political ecology. In Encyclopedia of geography, ed. B. Warf, 1101–1102. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412939591.n424.
Rocheleau, D., and P. Nirmal. 2015. Feminist political ecologies: Grounded, networked and rooted on earth. In The Oxford handbook of transnational feminist movements, ed. W. Baksh and R. Harcourt, 1–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943494.013.032.
Rocheleau, D.E., B.P. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari. 1996. Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local Experiences. New York: Routledge.
Schiebinger, L. 2014. Gendered innovations: Harnessing the creative power of sex and gender analysis to discover new ideas and develop new technologies. Triple Helix 1 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0009-7.
Shortall, S. 2014. Gender mainstreaming and the common agricultural policy. Gender, Place & Culture, A Journal of Feminist Geography 22 (5): 717–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.939147.
Spangler, K., and M.E. Christie. 2020. Renegotiating gender roles and cultivation practices in the Nepali mid-hills: Unpacking the feminization of agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 37: 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09997-0.
Subedi, A., and C. Garforth. 1996. Gender, information and communication networks: Implications for extension. European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 3 (2): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892249685300201.
Sundberg, J. 2014. Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies 21 (1): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013486067.
Tiessen, R. 2004. Re-inventing the gendered organization: Staff attitudes towards women and gender mainstreaming in NGOs in Malawi. Gender, Work and Organization 11 (6): 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00255.x.
Tsige, M., G. Synnevåg, and J.B. Aune. 2019. Is gender mainstreaming viable? Empirical analysis of the practicality of policies for agriculture-based gendered development in Ethiopia. Gender Issues. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-019-09238-y.
UNIVCAN. 2019. Equity, diversity and inclusion at Canadian Universities: Report on the 2019 national survey. https://www.univcan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Equity-diversity-and-inclusion-at-Canadian-universities-report-on-the-2019-national-survey-Nov-2019-1.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2020.
Uprety, B. R., Sharma, S. R., & Paudel, S. B. 2014. Food security in post conflict Nepal: Challenges and opportunities. Kathmandu: Nepal Centre for Contemporary Research (NCCR) and Department of Development Studies, School of Arts, Kathmandu University.
Verma, R. 2014. Business as un usual: The potential for gender transformative Change in development and mountain contexts. Mountain Research and Development 34 (3): 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd-journal-d-14-00072.1.
Whitehead, A. 2006. Some preliminary notes on the subordination of women’. IDS Bulletin 37 (4): 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1979.mp10003003.x.
World Bank. 2012. World development report 2012 : Gender equality and development. World Development Report 2012. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8810-5
Ylipaa, J., S. Gabrielsson, and A. Jerneck. 2019. Climate change adaptation and gender inequality: Insights from rural Vietnam. Sustainability 11 (10): 2805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102805.
Young, K. 1993. Planning development with women : Making a world of difference. London: Macmillan.
Acknowledgements
Sincere thanks to Prof. Manish Raizada, Prof. John FitzSimons, and Prof. Silvia Sarapura from the University of Guelph, Canada and Prof. Bipasha Baruah from the Western University, Canada for their valuable inputs and editing. We thank the female and male farmers, governmental officials, and local officers of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development of Nepal for providing the data for this research. We are grateful to IDRC, CIFSRF, GAC, in particular Dr. Kevin Tiessen and Dr. Marco Rondon, and to David and Ruth Hopper and Ramesh and Pilar Bhatia for funding to conduct this research. Thanks to the SAK Nepal Team including LI-BIRD for providing necessary logistical support for the study preparation and data collection.
Funding
RD was awarded the David and Ruth Hopper and Ramesh and Pilar Bhatia Canada Research Fellowship for PhD studies from IDRC (Ottawa). Additional financial support was from a grant to Prof. Manish Raizada, University of Guelph, Canada from the Canadian International Food Security Research Fund (CIFSRF), jointly funded by the International Research Centre (IDRC, Ottawa) and Global Affairs Canada (GAC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, RD and LPP; methodology: RD, LPP and HHO; validation: HHO, KB, and BRP; formal analysis: RD; investigation: RD; data curation: RD; writing-original draft preparation, RD; writing-review: LPP, HHO, KB, and BRP; writing review and editing: HHO, KB, and LPP; Supervision: HHO; Project administration: RD; funding acquisition, RD. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Guelph. The University of Guelph Research Ethics Board approved this research as a part of “Innovations for Terrace Farmers in Nepal and Testing of Private Sector Scaling Up Using Sustainable Agriculture Kits (SAKs) and Stall-Based Franchises” project. The Research Ethics Boards (REB) approval number was 16-12-566. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Devkota, R., Pant, L.P., Hambly Odame, H. et al. Rethinking gender mainstreaming in agricultural innovation policy in Nepal: a critical gender analysis. Agric Hum Values 39, 1373–1390 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10326-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10326-1