Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of Global Physical and Emotional SUDS

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the wide-spread use of Subjective Units of Discomfort Scales, or SUDS, to measure anxiety to specific stimuli, little information has been published on the validity of such scales and even less on their use as global measures of emotional and physical discomfort. Data was examined for 182 consecutive admissions to a psychology clinic to determine the relationship of self-rating of emotional and physical discomfort to one another and of the emotional self-rating to the clinician rating of general functioning (GAF). As expected, patients’ ratings of their emotional discomfort were significantly higher than ratings of their physical discomfort (t = 9.077, p < .001). Emotional SUDS were significantly and negatively related to clinicians’ GAF ratings (r = − 0.439, p < .001), indicating that the two ratings measured related global constructs. Data for the 53 patients who also completed the MMPI-2 was drawn from the larger sample to determine the nature of the relationship between SUDS and two measures of general emotional distress, with patients’ SUDS significantly related to both the A scale (r = 0.351, p < .05) and the neurotic index (r = 0.366, p < .01). Finally, there was a significant decrease in the emotional SUDS (t = 4.686, p < .001) but not the physical SUDS (t = 0.788, p = .434) after 3 months of psychotherapy. The data supports SUDS as global measures of both physical and emotional discomfort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1972). An MMPI handbook. Vol. 1. Clinical interpretation (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, B. N., & Freeman, A. M. (1998). Pain management psychotherapy: A practical guide. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The global assessment scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freidenberg, B. M., Blanchard, E. B., Wulfert, E., & Malta, L. S. (2002). Changes in physiological arousal to gambling cues among participants in motivationally enhanced cognitive-behavior therapy for pathological gambling: A preliminary study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 27, 251–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R. (1993). MMPI-2. Assessing personality and psychopathology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. L. (2000). The MMPI-2. An interpretive manual (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. G., Resick, P. A., & Mechanic, M. B. (1997). Objective assessment of peritraumatic dissociation: Psychophysiological indicators. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1081–1088.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. R., Kemmerling, R. L., & North, M. M. (2002). Brief virtual reality therapy for public speaking anxiety. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 543–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaycox, L. H., Foa, E. B., & Morral, A. R. (1998). Influence of emotional engagement and habituation on exposure therapy for PTSD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 185–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. F., & Holden, M. S. (1995). Mental health treatment and medical utilization: First pilot study in the military. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2, 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. M., Smith, T., & Coons, J. (1995). A validity study of the subjective unit of discomfort (SUD) score. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 27, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Bac, H., & Park, Y. C. (2008). Validity of the subjective units of disturbance scale in EMDR. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2, 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, J. M., Kleinknecht, R. A., Conley, A. T., Dalcerro, S., Schmidt, J., & Sonntag, M. E. (1992). A methodological critique of the current status of eye movement desensitization (EMD). Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, L. (2002). Exploring change mechanisms in EMDR applied to “small-t trauma” in short-term dynamic psychotherapy: research questions and speculations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1531–1544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, H. L., Ray, D. W., Kirby, B., Mason, D., Plant, D., Main, C. J., et al. (2005). Response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to psychological stress in patients with psoriasis. British Journal of Dermatology, 153, 1114–1120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch, J., & Bowman, K. M. (1945). Prolonged post-traumatic syndromes following head injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 102, 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, R. (1995). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Basic principles, protocols, and procedures. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B. A., Papsdorf, J. D., Davis, R., & Vallecorsa, S. (1984). Autonomic correlates of the subjective anxiety scale. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 15, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. L., Silver, S. M., Covi, W. G., & Foster, S. (1996). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Effectiveness and autonomic correlates. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27, 219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J., & Lazarus, A. A. (1966). Behavior therapy techniques: A guide to the treatment of neuroses. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry A. Tanner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanner, B.A. Validity of Global Physical and Emotional SUDS. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 37, 31–34 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-011-9174-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-011-9174-x

Keywords

Navigation