Abstract
This paper explores the impact of outcome-based funding on service delivery within employment services for people with serious mental illness. It draws on a case study of a policy change in the provincial disability support program in Ontario, Canada where funding for employment programs and services was changed from a fee-for-service to an outcome-based model. The findings highlight that the financial imperative for programs to meet employment targets in order to secure their funding has shifted the focus away from the provision of pre-employment supports to job development and job placements. However, there remains little attention to job matching and career development, and there is concern about access to services among those with complex barriers to employment. There is a need to reconcile tensions between the goals of outcome-based funding and on-the-ground service delivery to promote ongoing innovation in employment services for people with serious mental illness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett, S. M. (2004). Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public Administration, 82, 249–262. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00393.x.
Bond, G., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. R. (2008). An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 280–290. doi:10.2975/31.4.2008.280.290.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2003). Street-level research: Policy at the front lines. In M. C. Lennon & T. Corbett (Eds.), Policy into action: Implementation research and welfare reform (pp. 145–163). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Brooke, V., Green, H., O’Brien, D., White, B., & Amerstrong, A. (2000). Supported employment: It’s working in Alabama. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 163–171.
Cathexis Consulting Inc. (2012). Evaluation of the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) Employment Supports Program: Final report. Toronto, ON.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Christianson, J. B. (2007). Evaluating pay-for-performance in Medicaid through real-world observation. Health Affairs, 26, w528–w531. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.w528.
Coburn, D. (2000). Income inequalities, social cohesion and the health status of populations: The role of neo-liberalism. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 135–146. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00445-1.
Corden, A., & Thornton, P. (2003). Results-based funded supported employment: Avoiding disincentives to serving people with greatest need. Heslington, York: University of York. Retrieved January 15, 2014 from http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/pubs/pdf/rrep160.pdf.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Damberg, C. L., Raube, K., Teleki, S. S., & dela Cruz, E. (2009). Taking stock of pay-for-performance: A candid assessment from the front lines. Health Affairs, 28, 517–525. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.517.
Dias, J. J., & Moynard-Moody, S. (2007). For-profit welfare: Contracts, conflicts, and the performance paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 189–211. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul002.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Building theories from case study research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative research’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Felt-Lisk, S., Gimm, G., & Peterson, S. (2007). Making pay-for-performance work in Medicaid. Health Affairs, 26, w516–w527. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.w516.
Gates, L. B., Klein, S. W., Akabas, S. H., Myers, R., Schawager, M., & Kaelin-Kee, J. (2004). Performance-based contracting: Turning vocational policy into jobs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 31, 219–240. doi:10.1023/B:APIH.0000018831.52382.22.
Gates, L. B., Klein, S. W., Akabas, S. H., Myers, R., Schawager, M., & Kaelin-Kee, J. (2005). Outcomes-based funding for vocational services and employment of people with mental health conditions. Psychiatric Services, 56(11), 1429–1435. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.11.1429.
Latimer, E. (2005). Community-based care for people with severe mental illness in Canada. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 561–573. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.08.001.
Marshall, T., Goldberg, R. W., Braude, L., Dougherty, R. H., Daniels, A. S., Ghose, S. S., et al. (2014). Supported employment: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65, 16–23. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201300262.
Martin, L. L. (2004). Performance-based contracting for human services: Does it work? Administration in Social Work, 29(1), 63–77. doi:10.1300/J147v29n01_05.
McGrew, J., Johannesen, J., Griss, M., Born, D., & Katuin, C. (2005). Performance-based funding of supported employment: A multi-site controlled trial. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 23, 81–99.
McGrew, J., Johannesen, J., Griss, M., Born, D., & Katuin, C. (2007). Performance-based funding of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness: Vocational rehabilitation and employment staff perspectives. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 34, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11414-006-9045-z.
McLellan, A. T., Kemp, J., Brooks, A., & Carise, D. (2008). Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: The Delaware experiment. Health Policy, 87(3), 296–308. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.010.
Mechanic, D., Bilder, S., & McAlpine, D. D. (2002). Employing persons with serious mental illness. Health Affairs, 21, 242–253.
O’Brien, D., & Revell, G. (2005). The milestone payment system: results based funding in vocational rehabilitation—2005. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 23, 101–114.
National Alliance on Mental Illness. (n.d.). What is mental illness: Mental illness facts. Retrieved January 15, 2014 from http://www.nami.org/template.cfm?section=about_mental_illness.
ODSP Employment Supports. (2006) Directive 4.1Job Placement. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Community and Social Services.
Pedlar, A., & Hutchinson, P. (2000). Restructuring human services in Canada: Commodification of disability. Disability and Society, 15, 637–651. doi:10.1080/09687590050058224.
Piggott, L., & Grover, C. (2009). Retrenching Incapacity Benefit: Employment support allowance and paid work. Social Policy and Society, 8, 159–170. doi:10.1017/S1474746408004697.
Rapp, C. A. (2002). Incentive structures within mental health financing strategies: Toward an incentive based model. The Social Policy Journal, 1, 37–54. doi:10.1300/J185v01n02_04.
Schouwstra, M., & Ellman, M. (2006). A new explanatory model for policy analysis and evaluation. Rotterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, and Tinbergen Institute. Retrieved January 15, 2014 from http://papers.tinbergen.nl/06063.pdf.
Shankar, J., & Collyer, F. (2004). Welfare reform and its impact on the employment prospects of individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 3(4), 19–44. doi:10.1300/J198v03n04_03.
Shen, Y. (2003). Selection incentives in a performance-based contracting system. Health Services Research, 38(2), 535–552. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.00132.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stuart, H. (2006). Mental illness and employment discrimination. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 19, 522–526.
Thornicroft, G., Rose, D., Huxley, P., Dale, G., & Wykes, T. (2002). What are the research priorities of mental health services users? Journal of Mental Health, 11, 1–3. doi:10.1080/096382301200041416.
Waghorn, G., Chant, D., & Whiteford, H. (2002). Clinical and non-clinical predictors of vocational recovery for Australians with psychotic disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation, 68(4), 40–51.
Wilton, R. (2004a). More responsibility, less control: Psychiatric survivors and welfare state restructuring. Disability and Society, 19, 371–385. doi:10.1080/09687590410001689476.
Wilton, R. (2004b). Putting policy into practice: Poverty and people with serious mental illness. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 25–39. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00148-5.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted as part of the requirements for a PhD in Rehabilitation Science at the University of Toronto. Funding was received from a Canadian Graduate Scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Council (SSHRC) of Canada and the Canadian Occupational Therapy Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gewurtz, R.E., Cott, C., Rush, B. et al. How Does Outcome-Based Funding Affect Service Delivery? An Analysis of Consequences Within Employment Services for People Living With Serious Mental Illness. Adm Policy Ment Health 42, 19–28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0534-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0534-8