Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency-centered, innovation-enabling business models of high tech SMEs: Evidence from Hong Kong

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-technology small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are compelled to innovate to differentiate themselves from their competitors but at the same time be efficient, as they do not have economies of scale enjoyed by larger organizations. This qualitative study explores this paradoxical challenge faced by Hong Kong SMEs in designing their business model to strike such a balance. In doing so, it investigates the competencies of these firms in technology management and their innovation practices. It is found that third-party technologies that subscribe to international standards play a prominent role in the SME’s technology repertoire, as they are keen to leverage upon the effects of network externalities and other positive spillover effects. Although the firms’ business models enable product innovation, they also need to take efficiency into account to ensure that marketing and customer-intelligence are swiftly incorporated into their technology management and product development processes resulting in cyclic, incremental innovations. Our findings of efficiency-centered, innovation-enabling business models provide a more nuanced view of business model design in that efficiency and innovation need not be mutually exclusive. Four modalities of such business models are also identified: Focused, complementary, integrated innovation, and e-commerce-supported. These designs play an important role in enhancing product quality and performance, reducing time to market, developing new markets, and improving customer relationship and satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelkafi, N., Makhotin, S., & Posselt, T. 2013. Business model innovations for electric mobility: What can be learned from existing business model patterns?. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1): 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E., & Eisenman, M. 2001. Why management scholars must intervene strategically in the management knowledge market. Human Relations, 54(1): 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2001. Managed in Hong Kong: Adaptive systems entrepreneurship and human resources. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(1): 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2015. Innovation and growth in emerging economies. In Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development (Ed.). Designing the future: Economic, societal, and political dimensions of innovation: 353–387. Vienna: Echomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2002. An institutional perspective on the role culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(4): 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2009. International management: Strategy and culture in the emerging world. Mason: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Levitas, E., Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., & Zhu, H. 2014. The three faces of China: Strategic alliance partner selection in three ethnic Chinese economies. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 572–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Nair, A., & Law, P. 2003. Managing the institutional environment: Challenges for foreign firms in post WTO China. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68(2): 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Debei, M., & Avison, D. 2010. Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19: 359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 493–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2012. Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3): 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andries, P., Debackere, K., & van Looy, B. 2013. Simultaneous experimentation as a learning strategy: Business model development under uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(4): 288–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. 2009. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. 1996. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review, 74(4): 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baark, E., & So, A. Y. 2006. The political economy of Hong Kong’s quest for high technology innovation. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36(1): 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. 2013. Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Planning, 46(6): 419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). 2012. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. 2014. Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 43(2): 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. 2009. How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69–76.

  • Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. 2002. Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5): 735–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brem, A., & Tidd, J. (Eds.). 2012. Perspectives on supplier innovation: Theories, concepts and empirical insights on open innovation and the integration of suppliers: vol. 18. London: Imperial College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettel, M., Strese, S., & Flatten, T. C. 2012. Improving the performance of business models with relationship marketing efforts: An entrepreneurial perspective. European Management Journal, 30: 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, T. R., & Sanders, N. R. 2012. Can innovation be lean?. California Management Review, 54(4): 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. 2011. Business research methods: 3rd ed. Italy: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. 2010. From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2): 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Chang, A. Y., & Bruton, G. D. 2017. Microfinance: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future?. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(7): 793–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3): 529–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., & Roth, E. A. 2004. Seeing what’s next: Using theories of innovation to predict industry change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Bartman, T., & van Bever, D. 2016. The hard truth about business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1): 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. 2000. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2): 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. 2013. The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. 2005. Theory of technology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauss, T. 2016. Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3): 385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2011. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 36(1): 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortimiglia, M. N., Ghezzi, A., & Frank, A. G. 2015. Business model innovation and strategy making nexus: Evidence from a cross-industry mixed-methods study. R&D Management, 46(3): 414–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucculelli, M., & Bettinelli, C. 2015. Business models, intangibles and firm performance: Evidence on corporate entrepreneurship from Italian manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45(2): 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. 1993. Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, J. P. J., & Freel, M. 2010. Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. Research Policy, 39(1): 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. 2010. Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. 2014. Creating and capturing value from external knowledge: The moderating role of knowledge intensity. R&D Management, 44(3): 248–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desyllas, P., & Sako, M. 2013. Profiting from business model innovation: Evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto insurance. Research Policy, 42(1): 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. L. M., & Ahlstrom, D. 1995. Seeking the institutional balance of power: Avoiding the power of a balanced view. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. 2007. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eng, T. Y., & Spickett-Jones, J. 2009. An investigation of marketing capabilities and upgrading performance of manufacturers in mainland China and Hong Kong. Journal of World Business, 44(4): 463–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkel, E., & Gassmann, O. 2010. Creative imitation: Exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Management, 40(3): 256–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernkvist, M. 2015. The double knot of technology and business-model innovation in the era of ferment of digital exchanges: The case of OM, a pioneer in electronic options exchanges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99: 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., & Saren, M. 2001. Managing and marketing technology. London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19: 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E., Lorenzoni, G., & Ferriani, S. 2008. Speciation through entrepreneurial spin-off: The Acorn-ARM story. Research Policy, 37(2): 210–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Ahlstrom, D. 1997. Researchers’ roles in negotiating the institutional fabric of technologies. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4): 523–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboy, G. J. 2004. The myth behind China’s miracle. Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20040701faessay83405-p-40/george-j-gilby/the-myth-behind-china-s-miracle.html

  • Gomory, R. E. 1989. Product development: From “ladder science” to the product development cycle. Harvard Business Review, 89(6): 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresov, C., & Drazin, R. 1997. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review, 22(2): 403–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., Su, Z., & Ahlstrom, D. 2016. Business model innovation: The effects of exploratory orientation, opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial bricolage in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2): 533–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • HKSAR. 2014. Proposal to establish the innovation and technology bureau. http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr13-14/english/panels/ci/papers/ci0415cb1-1236-7-e.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct. 2017.

  • HKTDC. 2006. Development and contribution of Hong Kong’s manufacturing and trading sector. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Trade & Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, M., Clauss, T., & Schulz, E. 2015. The impact of organizational culture on a firm’s capability to innovate the business model. R&D Management, 46(3): 433–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. M., Crane, P. A., Nightingale, P., & Baden-Fuller, C. 2013. Buying big into biotech: Scale, financing, and the industrial dynamics of UK biotech, 1980–2009. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4): 903–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huygens, M., Baden-Fuller, C., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2001. Co-evolution of firm capabilities and industry competition: Investigating the music industry, 1877–1997. Organization Studies, 22(6): 971–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12): 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., & Oshri, I. 2014. Business model renewal and ambidexterity: Structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a cloud business model. R&D Management, 44(3): 322–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klang, D., Wallnöfer, M., & Hacklin, F. 2014. The business model paradox: A systematic review and exploration of antecedents. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4): 454–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, R. A. W., & Biemans, W. G. 2009. Creating a market-oriented product innovation process: A contingency approach. Technovation, 29: 517–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. S. 1998. The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. A. 2011. Complexity and innovation dynamics. In C. Antonelli (Ed.). Handbook on the economic complexity of technological change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudien, S. M., & Daxböck, B. 2016. Business model innovation processes of average market players: A qualitative-empirical analysis. R&D Management, 47(3): 420–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, D., & Slocum, J. W. 1991. Global strategic alliances: Payoffs and pitfalls. Organizational Dynamics, 19: 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. 2014. Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2): 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Serger, S. S., Tagscherer, U., & Chang, A. Y. 2017. Beyond catch-up—Can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?. Science and Public Policy, 44(5): 656–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Chen, Y. J., & Wang, L. C. 2017. Family business, innovation and organizational slack in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1): 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, L. C., Zhao, L., & Ahlstrom, D. 2013. Board turnover in Taiwan’s public firms: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 1059–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta, J. 2002. Why business models matter?. Harvard Business Review, 80(5): 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C. 2010. What to do against disruptive business models (when and how to play two games at once). MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(4), 25–32.

  • Markides, C. C. 2013. Business model innovation: What can the ambidexteritry literature teach us?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C., & Oyon, D. 2011. What to do against disruptive business models (when and how to play two games at once). MIT Sloan Management Review, Sloan Selection Collection Winter: 42–49.

  • Martins, L. L., Rindova, V. P., & Greenbaum, B. E. 2015. Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1): 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massa, L., & Tucci, C. L. 2014. Business model innovation. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of innovation management: 420–441. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. 2006. The bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. 2010. Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can't explain the modern world. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. 2013. Tunzelmann, Schumpeter, and the hockey stick. Research Policy, 42(10): 1706–1715.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. 2010. Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3): 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezger, F. 2014. Toward a capability-based conceptualization of business model innovation: Insights from an explorative study. R&D Management, 44(5): 429–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. 2013. Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook: 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. 2014. The changing university business model: A stakeholder perspective. R&D Management, 44(3): 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. 2016. A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. 2005. The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6): 726–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. 2000. Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1): 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagji, B., & Tuff, G. 2012. Managing your innovation portfolio. Harvard Business Review, May.

  • Nair, A., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. Delayed creative destruction and the coexistence of technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(4): 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, A., Ahlstrom, D., & Filer, L. 2007. Localized advantage in a global economy: The case of Bangalore. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(5): 591–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A., Schwarz, S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2017. Microfinance and entrepreneurship: An introduction. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(7): 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2001. Productivity manual: A guide to the measurement of industry-level and aggregate productivity growth. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. 2016. Lead and disrupt: How to solve the innovator’s dilemma. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osiyevskyy, O., & Dewald, J. 2015. Inducements, impediments, and immediacy: Exploring the cognitive drivers of small business managers’ intentions to adopt business model change. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4): 1011–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. 2010. Business model generation. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. 2005. Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. R. G., Gwozdz, W., & Hvass, K. K. 2016. Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organizational values within the fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–18.

  • Porter, M. E. 1996. What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review, 74, 61–78.

  • Prabhu, J., & Jain, S. 2015. Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: Understanding jugaad. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4): 843–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. 1986. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6): 485–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J., Donaldson, L., & Luo, B. N. 2012. The benefits of persisting with paradigms in organizational research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1): 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, F., Zardini, A., & Rossignoli, C. 2016. Organizational dynamism and adaptive business model innovation: The triple paradox configuration. Journal of Business Research, 69: 5487–5493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2003. In search of prosperity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. 1992. Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3): 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. 2001. Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. 2011. Good strategy, bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. New York: CrownBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, V., Craig-Kennard, A., & Mangematin, V. 2012. When technological discontinuities and disruptive business models challenge dominant industry logics: Insights from the drugs industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5): 949–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, V., Mangematin, V., & Rousselle, T. 2010. From recipe to dinner: Business model portfolios in the European biopharmaceutical industry. Long Range Planning, 43: 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. 2013. Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1): 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, P. 2011. Little bets: How breakthrough ideas emerge from small discoveries. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu, W. S. 2005. An institutional analysis of marketing practices of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17(1): 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. 2010. Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43(2): 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souto, J. E. 2015. Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation. Tourism Management, 51: 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Z., Ahlstrom, D., Li, J., & Cheng, D. 2013. Knowledge creation capability, absorptive capacity, and product innovativeness. R&D Management, 43(5): 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongur, S., & Engwall, M. 2014. The business model dilemma of technology shifts. Technovation, 34(9): 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trott, P. 2011. Innovation management and new product development. Philadelphia: Trans-Atlantic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velu, C. 2015. Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms. Technovation, 35: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, J. P. 2005. Developing strategic self-descriptions of SMEs. Technovation, 25(9): 989–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., & Hang, R. Z. 2008. Creating globally competitive and innovative products: China’s next Olympic challenge. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3): 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1981. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87: 548–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. 2015. The global competitiveness report 2015–16. In K. Schwab (Ed.). http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/. Accessed 5 Sep. 2017.

  • Wu, J., Guo, B., & Shi, Y. 2013. Customer knowledge management and IT-enabled business model innovation: A conceptual framework and a case study from China. European Management Journal, 31(4): 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam, R. C. M., Lo, W., Tang, E. P. Y., & Lau, A. K. W. 2011. Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 40: 391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. 2017. Case study research and applications: Design and methods: 6th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., Hao, S., Ahlstrom, D., Si, S., & Liang, D. 2014. Entrepreneurial firms’ network competence, technological capability, and new product development performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3): 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T. F. 2000. Hong Kong’s entrepreneurship: Behaviours and determinants. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(3): 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. 2007. Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2): 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. 2008. The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. 2010. Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2): 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. 2011. The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4): 1019–1042.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bath Business School and College of Liberal Arts, Bath Spa University, Newton St. Loe, Bath, BA2 9BN, UK

    Mark Loon

  2. CAS Logistics Limited, Hong Kong Science & Technology Park, Shatin, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    Roy Chik

Authors
  1. Mark Loon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy Chik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Loon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loon, M., Chik, R. Efficiency-centered, innovation-enabling business models of high tech SMEs: Evidence from Hong Kong. Asia Pac J Manag 36, 87–111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9558-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9558-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation