References
Barth E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue : A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter, Berlin
Eemeren F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris Publications, Dordrecht
Eemeren F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
van Eemeren F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2002, Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse: A Delicate Balance’, in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 131–159
Hamblin C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London
Krabbe, E. C. W.: 1996, Wat is eigenlijk een drogreden? [What Exactly is a Fallacy?] (inaugural address, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)
Krabbe E. C. W.: 2003, Metadialogues, in F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 83–90
Lorenzen P. and K. Lorenz: 1978, Dialogische Logik, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
Mackenzie J.: 1990, Four Dialogue Systems, Studia Logica 49, 567–583
Walton D. N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa
Walton D. N.: 1998, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument, University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Walton D. N. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houtlosser, P., van Laar, J.A. Metadialogues: Krabbe’s Immanent Dialectic. Argumentation 21, 205–208 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9053-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9053-z