Abstract
This essay studies an argumentative practice in eighteenth-century France by exploring the persuasiveness of some petitions to obtain printer licences. Those who wanted to enter the printing business in eighteenth-century France had to obtain licences from the King to do so. The French government had established limits to the number of printers it would permit to operate in the realm; hence, there was competition for any vacancy that became open. Thus, the context is that of trained printers in provincial towns, most of them with their own printing equipment, applying to the government in Paris for the highly valued licences to run printing businesses. We examine a small number of the original petitions and give an account of their persuasive capacity by (a) noticing the narrative character of the letters and (b) distinguishing between propositional and affective attitudes. Our view is that a reconstruction of the petitions as reasonable persuasive discourse is possible when it is noticed how the two kinds of attitudes can be combined to promote the same end.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A more extensive project is envisioned in which we pursue the relationship between 25 surviving applicant letters and the several hundred decrees summarizing the contents of applicant letters.
References
Primary Sources
Behourt, Elizabeth Le Notre. 1761. A Monseigneur de Malesherbes, premier président de la cour des aides, et chef de la librairie. Rouen: Archives départementales de la Seine Maritime, J 217.
Bruyset, Jean-Marie. 1788. Applicant letter. Paris: Archives Nationales V1 549 (25 August).
De Fay, Antoine. 1707. Mémoire pour Antoine de Fay, ancien compagnon imprimeur, poursuivant sa réception à la quatrième place d’imprimeur-libraire, vacant à Dijon …. Paris: Bibliothèque nationale, FF 22065 #71.
Mossy, Jean. 1789. Mémoire addressé à Monseigneur le Garde des Sceaux. Paris: Archives nationales, V1552.
Phillippot, Nicolas. 1746–1747. Three petitions. Bordeaux: Archives départementales de la Gironde, C 3309.
Racle, Michel. 1766. Mémoire à Monseigneur de Maupeou, chancelier et garde des sceaux. Bordeaux: Archives départementales de la Gironde, C 3309.
Vatar, Julien-Charles. 1754–1755?. Petition. Rennes: Archives departementales d’Ille-et-Vilaine. C 1462.
Secondary Sources and Theoretical Literature
Jasinski, James. 2001. Narrative. Sourcebook on rhetoric. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
McLeod, Jane A. 2011. Licensing loyalty: Printers, patrons and the state in early modern France. University Park: Penn State Press.
McLeod, Jane A., and Hans V. Hansen. 2005. Argument density and argument diversity in the license applications of French provincial printers, 1669–1781. In Argumemtation in practice, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and P. Houtlosser. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Mellot, Jean-Dominique. 1997. Entre “Librairie française” et marché du livre au XVIIIe siècle: repères pour un paysage éditorial. In Le Livre et l’historien, Études offertes à Henri-Jean Martin, ed. Frédéric Barbier, et al. Geneva: Droz.
Pinto, Robert C. 2001. Generalizing the notion of argument, in Argument, inference and dialectic, 10–20. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rigogne, Thierry. 2007. Between state and market: Printing and bookselling in eighteenth-century France. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, H.V., McLeod, J. Petitioning the King: The Case of Provincial Printers in Eighteenth-Century France. Argumentation 26, 161–170 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9233-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9233-8