Abstract
The Caliphate of the Islamic State developed a complex system of online argumentation that mediated and spanned the whole spectrum of jihadist literacy, from glossy magazines to short messages on social networks, from combattant letters to multimedia postings, and from chants to battle-field harangues and sermons. The overall effect was “terrifying” in the etymological sense of the word as arguments served to establish a unique intellectual “territory” that redoubled the physical one. It was molded by a sustained rhetoric that incorporated traditional juristic or theological modes of reasoning, and verbal/visual artefacts. It created an argued literacy meant to endure after the loss of territory. This essay details the various argumentative components of this literacy while questioning the knowledge “we” have of it.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer. Sovereign power and bare life (trans: Heller-Roazen, D.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Barth, B. 2017. Report: Pentagon removed online ISIS propaganda in secret Operation Glowing Symphony. SC Magazine. https://www.scmagazine.com/report-pentagon-removed-online-isis-propaganda-in-secret-operation-glowing-symphony/article/656063/.
Baudrillard, J. 1995. Simulacra and simulation (trans: Glaser, S.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Benveniste, E. 1973. Indo-European-language and society (trans: Palmer, E.). Coral Gables, FL: University of Florida Press.
Bunker, Robert J., and P. Bunker Ligouri. 2018. Radical Islamist English-language online magazines: Research guide, strategic insights, and policy pesponse. US Army War College. Retrieved from https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=1381.
CTC Sentinel. 2017. 10/7. Retrieved from https://ctc.usma.edu/august-2017/.
Debray, R. 2000. Transmitting culture (trans: Rauth, E.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Europol. 2018. Islamic State propaganda machine hit by law enforcement in coordinated takedown action. Retrieved from https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/islamic-state-propaganda-machine-hit-law-enforcement-in-coordinated-takedown-action.
Foucault, M. 1971. The discourse on language. In The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language, ed. M. Foucault, 215–213 (trans: Sheridan, A. M.). New York: Pantheon.
Gartenstein-Ross, D., N. Barr, and B. Bridget Moreng. 2016. The Islamic State’s global propaganda strategy. The Hague: The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. Retrieved from https://www.icct.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ICCT-Gartenstein-Ross-IS-Global-Propaganda-Strategy-March2016.pdf.
Johnson, T. (ed.). 2012. Franciscans and preaching. Every miracle from the beginning of the world came about through words. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Klein, A., and A. Waked. 2017. Islamic State supporters vow to conquer Rome following Manchester massacre. Breitbart Jerusalem. Retrieved from http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/05/25/exclusive-islamic-state-supporters-vow-conquer-rome-following-manchester-massacre/.
Laclau, E. 2007. On populist reason. New York: Verso.
Parret, H. 1992. De Baumgarten à Kant: sur la beauté. Revue philosophique de Louvain 87: 317–343.
Salazar, Ph.-J. 2017. Words are weapons: Inside ISIS’s rhetoric of terror. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sartre, J.-P. 1976. Critique of dialectical reason (trans: Sheridan-Smith, A.). London: New Left Books.
Zelin, A.Y. 2015. Picture or it didn’t happen: A snapshot of the Islamic State’s official media output perspectives on terrorism, 9/4. Retrieved from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/445/html.
Funding
This work was supported by University of Cape Town (Grant No. 2018 URC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.