Abstract
Hijab and other Islamic veiling clothing are important social and political symbols for Muslim women’s identity. Although recently there has been a large body of literature on the social and political aspects of hijab in Western countries, there has been no investigation of the origin and function of veiling itself. This article hypothesized that religious veiling, which eliminates the estrogen-induced body curves of reproductive age women, decreases men’s perceptions of women’s physical attractiveness, thereby serving mate guarding functions against rival men. To test this hypothesis. Measures of the motivational appeal and self-reported perceived attractiveness of women exhibiting different degrees of veiling were obtained from 80 Muslim male participants. The results showed that men were more motivated to view women exhibiting the less veiling and rated them more attractive than those women whose bodily curves were less apparent. These results support veiling serving a mate guarding function and reinforcing the marital bond.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afshar, H. (2008). Can I see your hair? Choice, agency and attitudes: The dilemma of faith and feminism for Muslim women who cover. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 411–427.
Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O’Connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32, 537–551.
Allen, C., & Nielsen, J. S. (2002). Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU15 after 11 September 2001. Vienna: European Monitoring Centre for Racism and Xenophobia.
Bayram, S. (2009). Reporting Hijab in Turkey: Shifts in the pro- and anti-ban discourses. Turkish Studies, 10, 511–538.
Brown, K. (2006). Realising Muslim women’s rights: The role of Islamic identity among British Muslim women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 417–430.
Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., Sherkat, D. E., & Gore, K. A. (2007). Are there religious variations in marital infidelity? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1553–1581.
Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.
Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23, 23–29.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.
Coene, G., & Longman, C. (2008). Gendering the diversification of diversity. Ethnicities, 8, 302–321.
Doyle, J. F., & Pazhoohi, F. (2012). Natural and augmented breasts: Is what is not natural most attractive? Human Ethology Bulletin, 27(4), 4–14.
Droogsma, R. A. (2007). Redefining Hijab: American Muslim women’s standpoints on veiling. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 294–319.
El Guindi, F. (2003). Veil: Modesty, privacy and resistance Oxford: Berg.
Frederick, D. A., Peplau, A., & Lever, J. (2008). The Barbie mystique: Satisfaction with breast size and shape across the lifespan. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 200–211.
Furnham, A., Lavancy, M., & McClelland, A. (2001). Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: A pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 491–502.
Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 539–549.
Gheibi, M. (2005). An 8000-year history of Persian costume. “Hasht Hezar Sal Tarikhe Poushake Aghvame Irani”. Tehran: Hirmand.
Ghumman, S., & Jackson, L. (2009). The downside of religious attire: The Muslim headscarf and expectations of obtaining employment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 4–23.
Henss, R. (1995). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 479–488.
Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.
Hussain, N. A. (2010). Religion and modernity: Gender and identity politics in Bangladesh. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33, 325–333.
Jasieńska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 1213–1217.
Keddie, N. (1991). Introduction: Deciphering middle eastern women’s history. In N. Keddie & B. Baron (Eds.), Women in middle eastern history: Shifting boundaries in sex and gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mahmud, Y., & Swami, V. (2009). The influence of the hijab (Islamic head-cover) on perceptions of women’s attractiveness and intelligence. Body Image, 7, 90–93.
Platek, S. M., & Singh, D. (2010). Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. PLoS ONE, 5, e9042.
Ruby, T. F. (2006). Listening to the voices of hijab. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 54–66.
Schiller, M. (1995). The obligation of married women to cover their hair. Journal of Halacha and Contemporary Society, 30, 81–108.
Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 415–425.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.
Strassmann, B. I., Kurapati, N. T., Hug, B. F., Burke, E. E., Gillespie, B. W., Karafet, T. M., et al. (2012). Religion as a means to assure paternity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 9781–9785.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tovee, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). The mystery of female beauty. Nature, 399, 215–216.
Unkelbach, C., Forgas, J. P., & Denson, T. F. (2008). The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1409–1413.
Weeden, J., Cohen, A. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2008). Religious attendance as reproductive support. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 327–334.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Jay R. Feierman for thoughtful comments and edit; James R. Liddle for comments and the language edit; Siamak Movahedi at the University of Massachusetts Boston for providing papers on the history of religious veiling; James F. Doyle and Dimitris Xygalatas for their insights and thoughtful comments; the Editor and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the earlier draft of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pazhoohi, F., Hosseinchari, M. Effects of Religious Veiling on Muslim Men’s Attractiveness Ratings of Muslim Women. Arch Sex Behav 43, 1083–1086 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0259-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0259-5