Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Limits to local spatial spread in a highly invasive annual grass (Microstegium vimineum)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential roles of seed and microsite limitation in local spatial spread of the invasive grass Microstegium vimineum were experimentally investigated in a woodland and open lawn in central New Jersey, USA. Plots (30 × 30 cm) in three sites previously unoccupied by M. vimineum for at least 8 years (woodland interior, woodland edge, and open lawn) were sown with ~262 M. vimineum seeds in early spring 2008. Seedling emergence, density, summer growth and autumn reproduction were compared to plots in a nearby control population where natural recruitment occurred. Seedling emergence was greatest in the open lawn (54% of seeds sown) where plants showed the greatest growth and reproduction due to high light availability. Seedling emergence was lowest in the woodland interior (24%) and edge sites (9%), and growth and reproduction were greatly reduced there (relative to the control). Plots in the open lawn supported a consistently high density of M. vimineum (>1,000 plants per m2) through the growing period (April to October). The number of seeds in both cleistogamous and chasmogamous spikelets was correlated with shoot dry mass and thus, total seed production was greatest in the sunny open lawn where plants were largest, despite high density there. Across all sites, plants in plots at the highest densities produced the most seeds. Total seed production correlated with levels of light, but not soil moisture. Both seed availability and microsite limitation may reduce the probability of establishment of new M. vimineum populations into previously unoccupied sites. Intraspecific density does not negatively affect survival or reproduction. Light and soil moisture can be limiting abiotic factors in some areas, but poor, natural seed dispersal limits the distribution of this invasive species on a local scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baiser B, Lockwood JL, La Puma D, Aronson MFJ (2008) A perfect storm: two ecosystem engineers interact to degrade deciduous forests of New Jersey. Biol Invasions 10:785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barden LS (1987) Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant, C4 grass, into a North Carolina floodplain. Am Midl Nat 118:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckage B, Clark JS (2003) Seedling survival and growth of three forest tree species: the role of spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 84:1849–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP (2005) Biomass partitioning and reproductive allocation in the invasive, cleistogamous grass Microstegium vimineum: influence of the light environment. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:214–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP (2006) A modular approach to biomass allocation in an invasive annual (Microstegium vimineum; Poaceae). Am J Bot 93:539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP (2007) Plasticity of chasmogamous and cleistogamous reproductive allocation in grasses. In: Columbus JT, Friar EA, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG (eds) Monocots: comparative biology and evolution–Poales. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, pp 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick GP (2008) Growth trajectories and size-dependent reproduction in the highly invasive grass Microstegium vimineum. Biol Invasions 10:761–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claridge K, Franklin SB (2002) Compensation and plasticity in an invasive plant species. Biol Invasions 4:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CJ, Poulsen JR, Levey DJ, Osenberg CW (2007) Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am Nat 170:128–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole PG, Weltzin JF (2004) Environmental correlates of the distribution and abundance of Microstegium vimineum, in east Tennessee. Southeast Nat 3:545–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole PG, Weltzin JF (2005) Light limitation creates patchy distribution of an invasive grass in eastern deciduous forests. Biol Invasions 7:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG, Kourtev P, Huang W (2001) Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecol Appl 11:1287–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81:1667–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (1992) Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Ehrlén J (2008) Seedling recruitment and population ecology. In: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL (eds) Seedling ecology and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 239–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrothers DE, Gray JR (1972) Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Gramineae) in the United States. Bull Torrey Bot Club 99:97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner M, Thompson K (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flory SL, Rudgers JA, Clay K (2007) Experimental light treatments affect invasion success and the impact of Microstegium vimineum on the resident community. Nat Areas J 27:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DJ, Spyreas G, Benedict J (2002) Life history of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an invasive grass in southern Illinois. J Torrey Bot Soc 129:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Honu YAK, Gibson DJ (2006) Microhabitat factors and the distribution of exotic species across forest edges in temperate deciduous forest of southern Illinois, USA. J Torrey Bot Soc 133:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton JL, Neufeld HS (1998) Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C4 grass, to variable light environments. Oecologia 114:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt DM, Zaremba RE (1992) The northeastern spread of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae) into New York and adjacent states. Rhodora 94:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Kohli RK, Singh HP, Batish DR, Pieterson EC (2009) Invasive plants: a threat to the integrity and sustainability of forest ecosystems. In: Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP, Batish DR (eds) Invasive plants and forest ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge CA, Neal JC, Shear TH (2008) Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) management for restoration of native plant communities. Inv Plant Sci Manage 1:111–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg CH, Bridgham SD (2004) Disturbance, herbivory, and propagule dispersal control dominance of an invasive grass. Biol Invasions 6:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtev PS, Huang WZ, Ehrenfeld JG (1999) Differences in earthworm densities and nitrogen dynamics in soils under exotic and native plant species. Biol Invasions 1:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Haggblom M (2002) Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology 83:3152–3166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrinos JG (2006) Spatially variable propagule pressure and herbivory influence invasion of chaparral shrubland by an exotic grass. Oecologia 147:327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Henry PR, Ammerman CB (1998) Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci 76:1216–1231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luken JO (2003) Invasions of forests in the eastern United States. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (eds) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 283–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JM, Buckley DS (2008) Influence of litter removal and mineral soil disturbance on the spread of an invasive grass in a Central Hardwood forest. Biol Invasions 10:531–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL (2009) Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front Ecol Environ 7:142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore KA, Elmendorf SC (2006) Propagule vs. niche limitation: untangling the mechanisms behind plant species’ distributions. Ecol Lett 9:797–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JA, Lubchansky HA, Mauck KE, McCartney K-M, Dunn B (2007) Ecological comparison of two co-invasive species in eastern deciduous forests: Alliaria petiolata and Microstegium vimineum. J Torrey Bot Soc 134:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2005) Seed, dispersal, microsite, habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitations. Oecologia 145:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH, Bazely DR (2003) Ecology and control of introduced plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt CM, Oswalt SN (2007) Winter litter disturbance facilitates the spread of the nonnative invasive grass Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus. For Ecol Manage 249:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt CM, Oswalt SN, Clatterbuck WK (2007) Effects of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus on native woody species density and diversity in a productive mixed-hardwood forest in Tennessee. For Ecol Manage 242:727–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Miao SL (1992) Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Conserv Biol 6:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauschert ESJ, Mortensen DA, Bjornstad ON, Nord AN, Peskin N (2009) Slow spread of the aggressive invader, Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stiltgrass). Biol Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9463-y

  • Redman DE (1995) Distribution and habitat types for Nepal Microstegium [Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) Camus] in Maryland and the District of Columbia. Castanea 60:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MR, Gilliam FS (2003) Response of the herbaceous layer to disturbance in eastern forest. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (eds) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 302–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Robichaud B, Buell MF (1983) Vegetation of New Jersey. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlova L, Verlinden M, Gloser J, Milbau A, Nijs I (2009) Which plant traits promote growth in the low-light regimes of vegetation gaps? Plant Ecol 200:303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen MA, D’Antonio CM, Suttle KB, Sousa WP (2006) Ecological resistance, seed density and their interactions determine patterns of invasion in a California coastal grassland. Ecol Lett 9:160–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Touchette BW, Romanello GA (2009) Growth and water relations in a central North Carolina population of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus. Biological Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9510-8

  • Tu M (2000) Element Stewardship Abstract for Microstegium vimineum. The Nature Conservancy’s Wildland Invasive Species Program, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull LA, Crawley MJ, Rees M (2000) Are plant populations seed limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (1989) Soil survey of Monmouth County, New Jersey. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, p 170

    Google Scholar 

  • von Ende CN (2001) Repeated-measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measures. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 134–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster CR, Rock JH, Froese RE, Jenkins MA (2008) Drought-herbivory interaction disrupts competitive displacement of native plants by Microstegium vimineum, 10-year results. Oecologia 157:497–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter K, Schmitt MR, Edwards GE (1982) Microstegium vimineum, a shade adapted C4 grass. Plant Sci Lett 24:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The manuscript was greatly improved by detailed comments and suggestions provided by two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, College of Staten Island, City University of New York, Staten Island, NY, 10314, USA

    Gregory P. Cheplick

Authors
  1. Gregory P. Cheplick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory P. Cheplick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheplick, G.P. Limits to local spatial spread in a highly invasive annual grass (Microstegium vimineum). Biol Invasions 12, 1759–1771 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9587-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9587-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation