Abstract
Mechanisms underlying invasive species impacts remain incompletely understood. We tested the hypothesis that priority resource access by an invasive biocontrol weevil, Rhinocyllus conicus, intensifies and alters the outcome of competition with native floral herbivores over flower head resources of the non-target, native host plant Cirsium canescens, specifically with the predominant, synchronous tephritid fly Paracantha culta. Four main results emerged. First, we documented strong, asymmetric competition, with R. conicus out-competing P. culta. Second, weevil priority access to floral resources accelerated competitive suppression of P. culta. Evidence for competitive suppression with increased weevil priority included decreases in both the numbers and the total biomass of native flies, plus decreases in individual P. culta fly mass and, so, potential fitness. Third, we found evidence for three concurrent mechanisms underlying the competitive suppression of P. culta by R. conicus. Prior use of a flower head by R. conicus interfered with P. culta pre-oviposition behavior. Once oviposition occurred, the weevil also reduced fly post-oviposition performance. Preemptive resource exploitation occurred, shown by the significant effect of flower head size on the total number of insects developing and in the magnitude of R. conicus effects on P. culta. Interference also occurred, shown by a spatial shift of surviving P. culta individuals away from the preferred receptacle resources as R. conicus priority increased. Finally, fourth, using an individual-based model (IBM), we found that the competitive interactions documented have the potential for imposing demographic consequences, causing a reduction in P. culta population sizes. Thus, priority resource access by an invasive insect increased competitive impact on the predominant native insect in the invaded floral guild. This study also provides the first experimental evidence for non-target effects of a weed biological control agent on an associated native insect herbivore.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal AA, Ackerly DD, Adler F, Arnold AE, Caceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson PJ, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz J, Strauss S, Turner MG, Werner E (2007) Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:145–152
Berube DE (1980) Interspecific competition between Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae) for ovipositional sites on diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa: Compositae). J Appl Entomol 90:299–306
Crowe M, Bouchier R (2006) Interspecific interactions between the gall-fly Urophora affinis Frfld. (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the weevil Larinus minutus Gyll. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), two biological control agents released against spotted knapweed, Centaurea stobe L. ssp. micranthos. Biocontrol Sci Tech 16:417–430
Denno RF, McClure MS, Ott JR (1995) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reexamined and resurrected. Ann Rev Entomol 40:297–331
Gandhi KJK, Herms DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasions 12:389–405
Gassmann A, Louda SM (2001) Rhinocyllus conicus: initial evaluation and subsequent ecological impacts in North America. In: Wajnberg E, Scott JK, Quimby PC (eds) Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI International, Wallingford, pp 147–183
Goeden RD, Andres LA, Freeman TE, Harris P, Pienkowski RL, Walker CR (1974) Present status of projects on the biological control of weeds with insects and plant pathogens in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci 22:490–495
Headrick D, Goeden RD (1990) Life history of Paracantha gentilis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:776–785
Howarth FG (1990) Hawaiian terrestrial arthropods: an overview. Bishop Mus Occas Pap 30:4–26
Hunt-Joshi T, Blossey B (2005) Interactions of root and leaf herbivores on purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Oecologia 142:554–563
Kaplan I, Denno R (2007) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory. Ecol Lett 10:977–994
Kaul RB (1989) Plants. In: Bleed A, Flowerday C (eds) An atlas of the Sand Hills. University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, pp 127–142
Kaul RB, Sutherland D, Rolfsmeier S (2007) The flora of Nebraska. Conservation and Survey Division, School of Natural Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Keeler KH, Harrison AT, Vescio L (1980) The flora and Sand Hills prairie communities of Arapaho Prairie, Arthur County, Nebraska. Prairie Nat 12:65–78
Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg M-A, Roques A, Timms L, Pere C, Cock JW, Settele J, Augustin S, Lopez-Vaamonde C (2009) Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 11:21–45
Lalonde RB, Roitberg BD (1992) Host selection behavior of a thistle-feeding fly: choices and consequences. Oecologia 90:534–539
Lamp WO, McCarty MK (1981) Biology and ecology of Platte thistle (Cirsium canescens). Weed Sci 29:686–692
Lamp WO, McCarty MK (1982a) Biology of predispersal seed predators of the Platte thistle Cirsium canescens. J Kans Entomol Soc 55:305–316
Lamp WO, McCarty MK (1982b) Predispersal seed predation of a native thistle, Cirsium canescens. Environ Entomol 11:847–851
Levine JM, Vila M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impact of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:775–781
Louda SM (1998a) Population growth of Rhinocyllus conicus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on two species of native thistles in prairie. Environ Entomol 27:834–841
Louda SM (1998b) Ecology of interactions in biological control practice and policy. Bull Br Ecol Soc 294:8–11
Louda SM (2000) Negative ecological effects of the musk thistle biocontrol agent, Rhinocyllus conicus Fröl. In: Follet PA, Duan JJ (eds) Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer, Boston, pp 215–243
Louda SM, Arnett AE (2000) Predicting non-target ecological effects of biological control agents: evidence from Rhinocyllus conicus. In: Spencer NR (ed) Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on the biological control of weeds. Montana State University, Bozeman, pp 551–567
Louda SM, Potvin MA (1995) Effect of inflorescence-feeding insects in the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. Ecology 76:229–245
Louda SM, Kendall D, Connor J, Simberloff D (1997) Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277:1088–1090
Louda SM, Arnett AE, Rand TA, Russell FL (2003a) Invasiveness of some biological control insects and adequacy of their ecological risk assessment and regulation. Conserv Biol 17:73–82
Louda SM, Pemberton RW, Johnson MT, Follett PA (2003b) Nontarget effects—the Achilles’ Heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Ann Rev Entomol 48:365–396
Louda SM, Rand TA, Arnett AE, McClay AS, Shea K, McEachern AK (2005a) Evaluation of ecological risk to populations of a threatened plant from an invasive biocontrol insect. Ecol Appl 15:234–249
Louda SM, Rand TA, Russell FL, Arnett AE (2005b) Assessment of ecological risks in biocontrol: input from retrospective ecological analyses. Biol Control 35:253–264
Maron JL, Vila M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373
Nufio CR, Papaj DR (2001) Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 99:273–293
Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson H, Holle BV, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19
Pearson DE, Callaway RM (2003) Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends Ecol Evol 18:456–461
Rand TA, Louda SM (2006) Invasive insect abundance varies across the biogeographic distribution of a native host plant. Ecol Appl 16:877–890
Rees NE (1982) Collecting, handling and releasing Rhinocyllus conicus, a biological control agent of musk thistle. Agric Res Serv USDA 579:1–7
Rose KA, Louda SM, Rees M (2005) Demographic and evolutionary impacts of native and invasive insect herbivores: a case study with Platte thistle, Cirsium canescens. Ecology 86:453–465
Russell FL, Louda SM (2004) Phenological synchrony affects interaction strength of an exotic weevil with Platte thistle, a native host plant. Oecologia 139:525–534
Russell FL, Louda SM (2005) Indirect effects mediate floral herbivory on a native thistle by an invasive exotic insect. Oecologia 146:373–384
Simberloff D, Stiling P (1996) How risky is biological control? Ecology 77:1965–1974
Smith L, Mayer M (2005) Field cage assessment of interference among insects attacking seed heads of spotted and diffuse knapweed. Biocont Sci Technol 15:427–442
White E, Wilson J, Clarke AR (2006) Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Divers Distrib 12:443–455
Wolfe LM (2002) Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. Am Nat 160:705–711
Zwölfer H, Harris P (1984) Biology and host specificity of Rhinocyllus conicus (Froel.) (Col., Curculionidae), a successful agent for biocontrol of the thistle, Carduus nutans L. Zeit Ang Entomol 97:36–62
Acknowledgments
We thank Kayla Christensen for energetic help in the field, Chad Andersen and Nate Brandt for conscientious help in the lab, and Steve Archer for discussions on data handling and analyses of the initial experiment. We appreciate the logistical support provided by UNL Cedar Point Biological Station staff and the financial support provided by NSF grant DEB 96-15299 to S. M. L., a D. H. Smith Conservation Research Fellowship to T. A. R., and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Scholarship for the Summer Independent Research Experience to A. A. R. K. We appreciate the stimulus for improvement provided by the comments of an anonymous reviewer, and the insightful suggestions of the Editor-in-Chief, Dan Simberloff. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Louda, S.M., Rand, T.A., Kula, A.A.R. et al. Priority resource access mediates competitive intensity between an invasive weevil and native floral herbivores. Biol Invasions 13, 2233–2248 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0036-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0036-5