Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating the dispersal routes used by an invasive amphibian, Lithobates catesbeianus, in human-dominated landscapes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clarifying how species move across and utilize human-modified landscapes is key to the conservation of declining populations, as well as to the management and control of invasive species. The North American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) is a globally distributed invasive amphibian that has been implicated in the decline of native amphibians across its invasive range and may also act as a transport vector for a number of deadly amphibian pathogens. Identifying the landscape-level features that facilitate or hinder this species as it moves across an ever-changing landscape is necessary to inform control efforts and limit this species’ impact on already declining amphibian populations. We conducted surveys of 243 wetlands across the Colorado Front Range and used an information-theoretic approach to evaluate the contribution of wetland-specific characteristics and landscape-level factors in determining the detection of bullfrog populations and breeding bullfrog populations. Specifically, our goal was to determine whether features related to overland dispersal or to the connectivity of wetlands were better predictors of bullfrog occurrence. Our results indicated that landscape-level factors that may either hinder or facilitate overland movement, such as topographic complexity and the density of wetlands, were the best predictors of bullfrog occurrence at the scale of our analysis, rather than characteristics relating to the connectivity of wetlands to lotic waterway systems. We suggest that when considering the control or eradication of this species, efforts should be directed at reducing hydroperiod of wetlands and should target regions with a high density of wetlands and/or low topographic relief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams MJ (2000) Pond permanence and the effects of exotic vertebrates on anurans. Eco Apps 10:559–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams MJ, Pearl CA, Bruce Bury R (2003) Indirect facilitation of an anuran invasion by non-native fishes. Ecol Lett 6:343–351. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00435.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birx-Raybuck DA, Price SJ, Dorcas ME (2009) Pond age and riparian zone proximity influence anuran occupancy of urban retention ponds. Urban Ecosystems 13:181–190. doi:10.1007/s11252-009-0116-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone MD, Semlitsch RD, Mosby C (2008) Suitability of golf course ponds for amphibian metamorphosis when bullfrogs are removed. Conserv Biol 22:172–179. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00817.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper GS, Hendricks R (2000) Rana catesbeiana. In: Lannoo MJ (ed) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO et al (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 81:163–182. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Pedlar JH, Pope SE et al (1995) Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biol Conserv 73:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola FG, De Bernardi F (2004) Amphibians in a human-dominated landscape: the community structure is related to habitat features and isolation. Biol Conserv 119:219–230. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49. doi:10.1017/S0376892997000088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman NS, Roberts SB (2001) Energy resources and changing land use, Front Range of Colorado. USGS Open-file report 01-172

  • Fuller TE, Pope KL, Ashton DT, Welsh HH (2011) Linking the distribution of an invasive amphibian (Rana catesbeiana) to habitat conditions in a managed river system in northern California. Restor Ecol 19:204–213. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00708.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerson GA (1999) Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado, 2nd edn. University Press of Colorado and Colorado Division of Wildlife, Niwot

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel JE, Lee CE, Zanden MJV (2005) Do reservoirs facilitate invasions into landscapes? BioScience 55:518–525

  • Hohausova E, Lavoy RJ, Allen MS (2010) Fish dispersal in a seasonal wetland: influence of anthropogenic structures. Mar Freshw Res 61:682–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram WM, Raney EC (1943) Additional studies on the movement of tagged bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. Am Midl Nat 29:239–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PTJ, Olden JD, Vander Zanden MJ (2008) Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Front Ecol Environ 6:357–363. doi:10.1890/070156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PTJ, McKenzie VJ, Peterson AC et al (2011) Regional decline of an iconic amphibian associated with elevation, land-use change, and invasive species. Conserv Biol 25:556–566. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01645.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson MG, Sauer JR, Olsen DA et al (1999) Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Cons Bio 13:1437–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maret TJ, Snyder JD, Collins JP (2006) Altered drying regime controls distribution of endangered salamanders and introduced predators. Biol Conserv 127:129–138. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney M, Lockwood J (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB (1973) Effects of introduced bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana, on the native frogs of the San Juoaquin Valley, California. Copeia 1973:18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MA, Evans JS, Storfer A (2010) Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 91:252–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308:405–408. doi:10.1126/science.1107887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ (2002) Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:291–315. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ (2007) Biogeographic barriers, connectivity and homogenization of freshwater faunas: it’s a small world after all. Freshw Biol 52:696–710. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01708.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray N, Lehmann A, Joly P (2002) Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability. Biodivers Conserv 11:2143–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter KO, Azous AL (2001) Amphibian distribution, abundance, and habitat use. In: Azous AL, Horner R (eds) Wetlands and urbanization: implications for the future. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 143–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ et al (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloegel LM, Picco AM, Kilpatrick AM et al (2009) Magnitude of the US trade in amphibians and presence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and ranavirus infection in imported North American bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). Biol Conserv 142:1420–1426. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schloegel LM, Ferreira CM, James TY et al (2010) The North American bullfrog as a reservoir for the spread of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Brazil. Anim Conserv 13:53–61. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00307.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2008) Differentiating Migration and Dispersal Processes for Pond-Breeding Amphibians. J Wildl Manage 72:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK, Yurewicz KL, Werner EE, Relyea RA (2003) Estimating decline and distributional change in amphibians. Conserv Biol 17:744–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation : are all amphibian populations metapopulations ? Ecography 28:110–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SV, Renwick WH, Bartley JD, Buddemeier RW (2002) Distribution and significance of small, artificial water bodies across the United States landscape. Sci Total Environ 299:21–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA et al (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science (New York, NY) 306:1783–1786. doi:10.1126/science.1103538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2000) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org. Accessed 1 Jan 2012

  • Wiener JD, Dwire KA, Skagen SK et al (2008) Riparian ecosystem consequences of water redistribution along the Colorado Front Range. Water Resources IMPACT 10:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis YL, Moyle DL, Baskett TS (1956) Emergence, breeding, hibernation, movements and transformation of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana, in Missouri. Copeia 1956:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA (2002) The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv Biol 16:1192–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright AH (1914) North American Anura: Life histories of the anura of Ithaca. Carnegie institution of Washington, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For assistance with field surveys, we thank R. Adams, A. Jensen, M. Evans, A. Massaro, A. Brown, R. Parkhill, R. Jadin, K. Dorsa and L. Arellano. For assistance with property access and logistical support we would like to acknowledge Boulder County Parks and Open Space, City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks, Jefferson County Open Space, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, White River National Forest, Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests, Colorado State Parks, U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, and the cities of Fort Collins, Arvada, Northglenn, Thornton, and Westminster. Field research was conducted over numerous years, and as such we would like to gratefully acknowledge funding from a number of sources, including the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Boulder County Parks and Open Space Small Grants Program, the Society of Wetland Scientists, the Morris Animal Foundation and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Finally, we would like to thank our anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna C. Peterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, A.C., Richgels, K.L.D., Johnson, P.T.J. et al. Investigating the dispersal routes used by an invasive amphibian, Lithobates catesbeianus, in human-dominated landscapes. Biol Invasions 15, 2179–2191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0442-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0442-y

Keywords

Navigation